Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T08:32:34.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative study of reproductive and nutritional periodicities in two populations of Asterias rubens (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) from the English Channel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. Nichols  and
M. F. Barker
D. Nichols
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, EX PS
M. F. Barker
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Exeter, Hatherly Laboratories, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, EX PS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Gonadial, pyloric caecal and somatic indices and oocyte size-frequencies are compared over a 3-year period for the starfish Asterias rubens from an intertidal nutritionally rich site and a subtidal impoverished site from the English Channel off south-west Britain. The intertidal population showed significantly higher values for all three indices over most of the study period compared with the subtidal population, and its spawning occurred later. The somatic index of the subtidal population showed a steeper rise than the intertidal population over that part of the cycle in which the gonads were undergoing enlargement, which gives further support to the suggestion that starfishes deprived of sufficient food may give priority to maintenance of the body-wall over enlargement of either the food-storage tissues of the pyloric caeca or the gonads.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , May 1984 , pp. 471 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barker, M. F. & Nichols, D., 1983. Reproduction, recruitment and juvenile ecology of the starfish Asterias rubens and Marthasterias glacialis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 745–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boolootian, R. A., 1966. Reproductive physiology. In Physiology of Echinodermata (Ed. Boolootian, R. A.), pp. 561–613. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Coe, W. R., 1912. Echinoderms of Connecticut. Bulletin. Connecticut State Geological and Natural History Survey, no. 19, 152 pp.Google Scholar
Cognetti, G. & Delavault, R., 1962. La sexualité des Astérides. Cahiers de biologie marine, 3, 157–182.Google Scholar
Costello, D. P., Davidson, M. E., Eggars, A., Fox, M. C. & Harley, C., 1957. Methods for Obtaining and Handling Marine Eggs and Embryos. 247 pp. Woods Hole, Mass.: Marine Biological Laboratory.Google Scholar
Crump, R. G., 1971. Annual reproductive cycles in three geographical separated populations of 1 Patiriella regularis (Verrill), a common New Zealand asteroid. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 7, 137–162.Google Scholar
Dare, P. J., 1982. Notes on the swarming behaviour and population density of Asterias rubens L. (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) feeding on the mussel, Mytilus edulis L. Journal du Conseil, 40, 112–118.Google Scholar
Farmanfarmaian, A., Giese, A. C., Boolootian, R. A. & Bennett, J., 1958. Annual reproductive cycles in four species of west coast starfishes. Journal of Experimental Biology, 138, 355–367.Google Scholar
Galtsoff, P. S. & Loosanoff, V. L., 1939. Natural history and method of controlling the starfish (Asterias forbesi, Desor). Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries, no. 31, 75–132.Google Scholar
Gemmill, J. F., 1914. The development and certain points in the adult structure of the starfish Asterias rubens. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (B), 205, 213–294.Google Scholar
Giese, A. C., 1966. On the biochemical constitution of some echinoderms. In Physiology of Echinodermata (Ed. Boolootian, R. A.), pp. 757–796. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Glese, A. C., 1969. General physiology of the echinoderm body wall, with special reference to asteroids and echinoids. Antarctic Journal of the United States, 4, 192–193.Google Scholar
Guillou, M., 1980. Données sur la croissance d'Asterias rubens en Bretagne Sud. In Echinoderms: Present and Past. Proceedings of the European Colloquium on Echinoderms, Brussels, 1979 (Ed. Jangoux, M.), pp. 179–185. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Harrold, C., & Pearse, J. S., 1980. Allocation of pyloric caecum reserves in fed and starved sea star, Pisaster giganteus (Stimpson): somatic maintenance comes before reproduction. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 48, 169–184.Google Scholar
Hatanaka, M. & Kosaka, M., 1958. Biological studies on the population of the starfish Asterias amurensis. Tohoku Journal of Agricultural Research, 9, 159–178.Google Scholar
Jangoux, M. & Impe, E. Van, 1977. The annual pyloric cycle of Asterias rubens L. (Echinodermata: Asteroidea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 30, 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jangoux, M. & Vloebergh, M., 1973. Contribution a l'étude du cycle annuel de reproduction d'une population d'Asterias rubens (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) du littoral Beige. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 6, 389–408.Google Scholar
Kowalski, R., 1955. Untersuchungen zur Biologie des Seesternes Asterias rubens L. in Brachwasser. Kieler Meeresforschungen, 11, 201–212.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. M., 1973. Level, content and calorific equivalents of the lipid, carbohydrate and protein in the body components of Luidia clathrata (Echinodermata: Asteroidea: Platyasterida) in Tampa Bay. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 11, 263–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauzey, K. P., 1966. Feeding behaviour and reproductive cycles in Pisaster ochraceus. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 131, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mileikovsky, S. A., 1968. Breeding of the starfish Asterias rubens L. in the White, Barents, Norwegian and other European seas. Okeanologiya, Moscow, 8, 693–704. [In Russian, with English summary.]Google Scholar
Nauen, C. E., 1978. The growth of the sea-star Asterias rubens and its role as a benthic predator in Kiel Bay. Kieler Meeresforschungen, sonderheft 4, 68–81.Google Scholar
Nichols, D. & Barker, M. F., 1984. Reproductive and nutritional periodicities in the starfish, Marthasterias glacialis, from Plymouth Sound. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 461–470.Google Scholar
Pearse, J. S., 1965. Reproductive periodicities in several contrasting populations of Odontaster validus Koehler, a common Antarctic asteroid. Antarctic Research Series, 5, 39–85.Google Scholar
Plas, A. J. Van Der & Oudejans, R. C. H. M., 1982. Changes in the activities of selected enzymes of intermediary metabolism in the pyloric caeca and ovaries of Asterias rubens during the annual reproductive cycle. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 71B, 379–386.Google Scholar
Smith, G. F. M., 1940. Factors limiting distribution and size in the starfish. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 5, 84–103.Google Scholar
Vevers, H. G., 1949. The biology of Asterias rubens L.: growth and reproduction. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 28, 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar