Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:09:10.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cleaning symbiosis among British fish with special reference to Crenilabrus melops (Labridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. W. Potts
G. W. Potts
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three new examples of cleaning symbiosis are recorded among the British labridae, Crenilabrus melops, Ctenolabrus rupestris and Centrolabrus exoletus. The first two have only been seen in aquaria although parasites in the stomach of C. melops caught offshore suggests cleaning activity occurs in their natural environment. C. melops has been observed in the public aquarium taking parasites from the bodies of a number of host fish most commonly the pink bream (Pagellus centrodontus). Most cleaning activity occurs after the lights are first turned on when the hosts remain stationary to be cleaned. At this time the incidence of parasites on their bodies is most obvious. Certain areas of the body are cleaned in preference to others. Details are given of cleaning symbiosis by the pipe fish Enterlurus aequoreus, Syngnathus typhle and S. acus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , February 1973 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Casimir, M. J., 1969. Zum Verhalten des Putzerfisches Symphodus melanocercus (Risso). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, Berlin, 26, 225–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I., 1955 Über Symbiosen, Parasitismus und andere besondere zwischenartlicke Besiehungen tropischer Meeresfiscke. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, Berlin, 12, 203–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, H. M., 1966. Cleaning symbiosis in the marine environment. In: Symbiosis, Ed. S., Mark Henry, 1, Chapter 7, pp. 327–80. New York: Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
Fiedler, K., 1964. Verhaltensstudien an Lippfischen der Gattung Crenilabrus (Labridae, Perciformes). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, Berlin, 21, 521–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herald, E. S., 1965. Cleaner fish for a cleaner aquarium. Pacific Discovery, 27, 28–9.Google Scholar
Hobson, E. S., 1969. Comments on certain recent generalizations regarding cleaning symbiosis in fishes. Pacific Science, 23 (1), 35–9.Google Scholar
Hobson, E. S., 1971. Cleaning symbiosis among California inshore fishes. Bulletin of the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration of the United States, 69, 491–523.Google Scholar
Limbaugh, C., 1961. Cleaning symbiosis. Scientific American, 206, 42–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Losey, G. S., 1971. Communication between fishes in cleaning symbiosis. In: Aspects of the Biology of Symbiosis, Ed. Cheng, T. C. (Proceedings of a Symposium held in Boston, Massachusetts, 28–29, December, 1969), pp. 45–79. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Marine Biological Association, 1957. Plymouth Marine Fauna, 3rd ed., p. 457.Google Scholar
Morris, D., 1958. The reproductive behaviour of the ten-spined stickleback Pygosteus pungitius, L.). Behaviour (Supplement, 6), pp. 1–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okuno, R., 1969 a. Cleaning behaviours of the rainbow wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus I. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 19 (5), 184–91.Google Scholar
Okuno, R., 1969 b. Cleaning behaviours of the rainbow wrasse, Labroides dimidiatus II. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 19 (6), 217–22.Google Scholar
Potts, G. W., 1968. The ethology of Crenilabrus melanocercus, with notes on cleaning symbiosis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 279–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, J. E., 1958. A review of the labrid fish genus Labroides, with descriptions of two new species and notes on ecology. Pacific Science, 12 (4), 327–47.Google Scholar
Randall, J. E., 1962. Fish service stations. Sea Frontiers, 8, 40–7.Google Scholar
Wahlert, G. von & Wahlert, H. von, 1961. Le compartement de nettoyage de Crenilabrus melanocercus (Labridae) en Mediterranée. Vie et Milieu, 12, 1–10.Google Scholar
Wahlert, G. von & Wahlert, H. von, 1962. Beobachtungen und Bemerkungen zum Putzverhalten von Mittelmeerfischen. Veröffentichungen des Instituts für Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven, 8, 71–7.Google Scholar
Wickler, W., 1956. Eine Putzsymbiose zwischen Corydoras und Trichogaster. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, Berlin, 13, 46–9.Google Scholar
Wickler, W., 1963. Zum Problem der Signalbildung, am Beispiel der Verhaltens Mimikry zwischen Aspidontus und Labroides (Pisces, Acanthopterygii). Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, Berlin, 20, 657–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wickler, W., 1971. Das Putzergewerbe. Aquar. Magazine, 5 (2), 48–51.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1960. The new aquarium and new sea-water circulation systems at the Plymouth Laboratory. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 39, 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1962. Zeus faber and Cepola rubescens in captivity. Bulletin de I’lnstitut Oceanographique de Monaco, No. spécial 1A, 35–40.Google Scholar
Youngbluth, M. J., 1968. Aspects of the ecology and ethology of the cleaning fish, Labroides phthirophagus Randall. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, Berlin, 25 (8), 915–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar