Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T19:35:26.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A check-list of the extant Haptophyta of the world

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. W. Jordan  and
J. C. Green
R. W. Jordan
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Deacon Laboratory, Brook Road, Wormley, Surrey, GU8 5UB
J. C. Green
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Members of the Haptophyta from British waters have been listed in a number of check-lists between 1953 and 1976 (Parke, 1953; Parke & Dixon, 1964, 1968, 1976), but there has been no attempt to draw the records together on a world-wide basis. However, a recent review of the classification system of the coccolithophorids included a check-list of all species thought to be extant from marine, coastal and freshwater habitats (Jordan & Kleijne, 1994). At the same time, two ambitious projects, the Encyclopaedia of Algal Genera (ed. B.C. Parker, in preparation) and the preparation of a CD-ROM retrieval system for information on algal and protist groups by the Expert-Centre for Taxonomic Identification (ETI), have required further collation of the available records (see Note 1), and, as a result, we have now extended the scheme of Jordan & Kleijne (1994) to include a global list of all extant haptophytes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , February 1994 , pp. 149 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anand, P.L., 1937. A taxonomic study of the algae of the British chalk-cliffs. Journal of Botany, 75, supplement 2, 1–51.Google Scholar
Bernard, F., 1939. Coccolithophorides nouveaux ou peu connus observés à Monaco en 1938. Archives de Zoologia Expérimentale et Générate, Notes et Revue, 81, 33–44.Google Scholar
Biekart, J.W., 1989. The distribution of calcareous nannoplankton in late Quaternary sediments collected by the Snellius II Expedition in some southeast Indonesian basins. Proceedings Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, series B, 92, 77–141.Google Scholar
Billard, C., 1976. Sur une nouvelle espèce de Pavlova, P. virescens nov. sp. (Haptophycées). Bulletin de la Société Phycologique de France, 21, 18–27.Google Scholar
Billard, C., 1983. Prymnesium zebrinum sp. nov. et P. annuliferum sp. nov., deux nouvelles espèces apparentées à P. parvum Carter (Prymnesiophyceae). Phycologia, 22, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billard, C. & Gayral, P., 1972. Two new species of Isochrysis with remarks on the genus Ruttnera. British Phycological Journal, 7, 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borsetti, A.M. & Cati, F., 1976. II nannoplankton calcareo vivente nel Tirreno centromeridionale, parte II. Giornale di Geologia, series 2a, 40, 209–240.Google Scholar
Borsetti, A.M. & Cati, F., 1979. II nannoplankton calcareo vivente nel Tirreno centromeridionale, parte III. Giornale di Geologia, series 2a, 43, 157–164.Google Scholar
Boudreaux, J.E. & Hay, W.W., 1969. Calcareous nannoplankton and biostratigraphy of the late Pliocene-Pleistocene-Recent sediments in the submarex cores. Revista Española de Micropaleontologia, 1, 249–292.Google Scholar
Bourrelly, P., 1953. Flagellés incolores rares ou nouveaux. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 100, 533–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourrelly, P., 1957. Recherches sur les Chrysophycées. Morphologie, phylogénie, systématique. Revue Algologique. Mémoire Hors-Série, 1, 1–412.Google Scholar
Bourrelly, P. 1981. Les algues d'eau douce. II. Les algues jaunes et brunes. Paris: Éditions Boubée. [Revised edition.]Google Scholar
Braarud, T., 1954. Coccolith morphology and taxonomic position of Hxjmenomonas roseola Stein and Syracosphaera carterae Braarud & Fagerland. Nytt Magasin for Botanikk, 3, 1–4.Google Scholar
Braarud, T., 1960. On the coccolithophorid genus Cricosphaera n. gen. Nytt Magasin for Botanikk, 8, 211–212.Google Scholar
Braarud, T., Bramlette, M.N., Deflandre, G., Kamptner, E., Loeblich, A.R., Martini, E. & Tappan, H., 1964. Rhabdosphaera Haeckel, 1894 (Coccolithophorida): proposed validation under the plenary powers and designation of a lectotype for Coccolithus oceanicus Schwarz, 1894. Z.N.(S.) 1658. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 21, 397–400.Google Scholar
Bréhéret, J., 1978. Formes nouvelles quaternaires et actuelles de la famille des Gephyrocapsaceae (Coccolithophorides). Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire des Séances de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, 287 (Série D), 447–449.Google Scholar
Bukry, D., 1973. Phytoplankton stratigraphy, Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 20, western Pacific Ocean. In Initial reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 20 (ed. B.C., Heezenet al.), pp. 307–317. Washington: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Butcher, R.W., 1952. Contributions to our knowledge of the smaller marine algae. journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 31, 175–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büttner, J., 1910. Die farbigen Flagellaten des Kieler Hafens. Dissertation presented to the Philosophical Faculty of the Christian-Albrechts-University, Kiel, 16 pp. [Subsequently published in identical format with double pagination, see Büttner, 1911.]Google Scholar
Büttner, J., 1911. Die farbigen Flagellaten des Kieler Hafens. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, Abteilung Kiel., 12, 119–133.Google Scholar
Carter, N., 1937. New or interesting algae from brackish waters. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 90, 1–68.Google Scholar
Cavalier-Smith, T., 1986. The kingdom Chromista: origin and systematics. Progress in Phycological Research, 4, 309–347.Google Scholar
Cavalier-Smith, T., 1989. The kingdom Chromista. In The chromophyte algae: problems and perspectives, (ed. J.C., Greenet al.), pp. 381–407. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Systematics Association Special Volume no. 38; actual year of publication, 1990.]Google Scholar
Cavalier-Smith, T., 1993. Kingdom Protozoa and its 18 phyla. Microbiological Reviews, 57, 953–994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, F.H. & Ryan, K.G., 1985. Prymnesium calathiferum sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae), a new species isolated from Northland, New Zealand. Phycologia, 24, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chodat, R. & Rosillo, A.R., 1925. Sur une Coccolithophoridée d'eau douce. Comptes Rendu des Séances de la Société de Physique et d'Histoire Naturelle de Génève, 42, 51–53.Google Scholar
Chrétiennot-Dinet, M.-J., 1990. Atlas du Phytoplancton Marin. Vol. III. Chlorarachniophycées, Chlorophycées, Chrysophycées, Cryptophycées, Euglénophycées, Eustigmatophycées, Prasinophycées Prymnésiophycées, Rhodophycées et Tribophycées. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Chrétiennot-Dinet, M.-J., Sournia, A., Ricard, M. & Billard, C., 1993. A classification of the marine phytoplankton of the world from class to genus. Phycologia, 32, 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, T., 1978. Annotations to a textbook of phycology. Botanisk Tidsskrift, 73, 65–70.Google Scholar
Christensen, T., 1980. Algae. AiO Tryk as, Odense.Google Scholar
Cienkowsky, L., 1881. Bericht über die im Jahre 1880 an das Weisse Meer unternommene Excursion. Arbeiten St. Petersburg Naturf. Gesellschaft, 12, 130–171. [An account of the White Sea Excursion for 1880 (in Russian). Trudy Imperatorskago S. Peterburgskago Obshchestva Estestvoispytatelei, 12, 130–171.]Google Scholar
Cohen, C.L.D. & Reinhardt, P., 1968. Coccolithophorids from the Pleistocene Caribbean deep-sea core CP–28. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Palàontologie. Abhandlungen, 131, 289–304.Google Scholar
Conrad, W., 1926. Recherches sur les flagellates de nos eaux saumātres. 2° partie: Chrysomonadines. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 56, 167–231.Google Scholar
Conrad, W. 1928. Sur les Coccolithophoracées d'eau douce. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 63, 58–66.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1947. Braarudosphaera nov. gen. type d'une famille nouvelle de Coccolithophorides actuels à éléments composites. Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 225, 439–441.Google Scholar
Deflandre, G., 1952. Classe des Coccolithophoridés (Coccolithophoridae Lohmann, 1902). In Traité de zoologie vol. 1 (ed. P.-P., Grassé), pp. 439–470. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Droop, M.R., 1953. On the ecology of flagellates from some brackish and fresh-water pools of Finland. Acta Botanica Fennica, 51, 3–52.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F., 1841. Histoire naturelle des zoophytes infusoires comprenant la physiologie et la classification de ces animaux et la manière de les étudier à l'aide du microscope. Paris.Google Scholar
Estep, K.W., Davis, P.G., Hargraves, P.E. & Sieburth, J.McN., 1984. Chloroplast containing microflagellates in natural populations of North Atlantic nanoplankton, their identification and distribution, including a description of five new species of Chrysochromulina (Prymnesiophyceae). Protistologica, 20, 613–634.Google Scholar
Estep, K.W.et al., 1992. Deus creavit, Linnaeus disposuit: an international effort to create a catalogue and expert system for the identification of protistan species. Sarsia, 77, 275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G.O. & China, W.E., 1967. Opinion 805. Rhabdosphaera Haeckel, 1894 (Coccolithophorida): validated under the plenary powers. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 24, 20–21.Google Scholar
Fournier, R.O., 1971. Chrysocampanula spinifera gen. et sp. nov., a new marine haptophyte from the Bay of Chaleurs, Quebec. Phycologia, 10, 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fresnel, J. & Billard, C., 1991. Pleurochrysis placolithoides sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae), a new marine coccolithophorid with remarks on the status of cricolith-bearing species. British Phycological Journal, 26, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fütterer, D., 1976. Kalkige Dinoflagellaten (‘Calciodinelloideae’) und die systematische Stellung der Thoracosphaeroideae. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. Abhandlungen, 151, 119–141.Google Scholar
Fütterer, D., 1977. Distribution of calcareous dinoflagellates in Cenozoic sediments of Site 366. Eastern North Atlantic. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project (ed. Y., Lancelotet al.), 41, 709–737.Google Scholar
Gaarder, K.R., 1962. Electron microscope studies on holococcolithophorids. Nytt Magasin for Botanikk, 10, 35–51.Google Scholar
Gaarder, K.R., 1967. Observations on the genus Ophiaster Gran (Coccolithineae). Sarsia, 29, 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaarder, K.R., 1970. Three new taxa of Coccolithineae. Nytt Magasin for Botanikk, 17, 113–126.Google Scholar
Gaarder, K.R. & Hasle, G.R., 1971. Coccolithophorids of the Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science, 21, 519–544.Google Scholar
Gaarder, K.R. & Heimdal, B.R., 1973. Light and scanning electron microscope observations on Rhabdothorax regale (Gaarder) Gaarder nov. comb. Norwegian Journal of Botany, 20, 89–97.Google Scholar
Gaarder, K.R. & Heimdal, B.R., 1977. A revision of the genus Syracosphaera Lohmann (Coccolithineae). ‘Meteor’ Forschungs-Ergebnisse, serie D, 24, 54–71.Google Scholar
Gaarder, K.R. & Markali, J., 1956. On the coccolithophorid Crystallolithus hyalinus n. gen., n. sp. Nytt Magasin for Botanikk, 5, 1–5.Google Scholar
Gaarder, K.R. & Ramsfjell, E., 1954. A new coccolithophorid from northern waters, Calciopappus caudatus n. gen., n. sp. Nytt Magasin for Botanikk, 2, 155–156.Google Scholar
Gallagher, L., 1989. Reticulofenestra: a critical review of taxonomy, structure and evolution. In Nannofossils and their applications (ed. Crux, J. A. and Heck, S.E. Van), pp. 41–75. Chichester: Ellis Horwood Ltd. [British Micropalaeontological Society Series.]Google Scholar
Gartner, S. & Bukry, D., 1969. Tertiary holococcoliths. Journal of Paleontology, 43, 1213–1221.Google Scholar
Gayral, P. & Fresnel, J., 1976. Nouvelles observations sur deux Coccolithophoracées marines: Cricosphaera roscoffensis (P. Dangeard) comb. nov. et Hymenomonas globosa (F. Magne) comb. nov. Phycologia, 15, 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayral, P. & Fresnel, J., 1979. Révision du genre Hymenomonas Stein. A propos de l'étude comparative de deux Coccolithacées: Hymenomonas globosa (Magne) Gayral et Fresnel et Hymenomonas lacuna Pienaar. Revue Algologique, N.S., XIV, 2, 117–125.Google Scholar
Gayral, P. & Fresnel, J., 1983a. Platychrysis pienaarii sp. nov. et P. simplex sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae): description et infrastructure. Phycologia, 22, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayral, P. & Fresnel, J., 1983b. Description, sexualité et cycle de développement d'une nouvelle Coccolithophoracée (Prymnesiophyceae): Pleurochrysis psendoroscoffensis sp. nov. Protistologica, 19, 245–261.Google Scholar
Geitler, L., 1930. Ein grunes Filarplasmodium und andere neue Protisten. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 69, 615–636.Google Scholar
Gran, H.H., 1912. Pelagic plant life. In The depths of the Ocean (ed. Murray, J. and Hjort, J.), pp. 307–386. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Green, J.C., 1973. Studies in the fine structure and taxonomy of flagellates in the genus Pavlova. II. A freshwater representative, Pavlova granifera (Mack) comb. nov. British Phycological Journal, 8, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J.C., 1975. The fine-structure and taxonomy of the haptophycean flagellate Pavlova lutheri (Droop) comb. nov. (= Monochrysis lutheri Droop). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 785–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J.C., 1976a. Corymbellus aureus gen. et sp. nov., a new colonial member of the Haptophyceae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J.C., 1976b. Notes on the flagellar apparatus and taxonomy of Pavlova mesolychnon van der Veer, and on the status of Pavlova Butcher and related genera within the Haptophyceae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 595–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J.C., 1980. The fine structure of Pavlova pinguis Green and a preliminary survey of the order Pavlovales (Prymnesiophyceae). British Phycological Journal, 15, 151–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J.C. & Hibberd, D.J., 1977. The ultrastructure and taxonomy of Diacronema vlkianum (Prymnesiophyceae) with special reference to the haptonema and flagellar apparatus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 57, 1125–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J.C., Hibberd, D.J. & Pienaar, R.N., 1982. The taxonomy of Prymnesium (Prymnesiophyceae) including a description of a new cosmopolitan species, P. patellifera sp. nov., and further observations on P. parvum N. Carter. British Phycological Journal, 17, 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J.C. & Leadbeater, B.S.C., 1972. Chrysochromulina parkeae sp. nov. [Haptophyceae] a new species recorded from S.W. England and Norway. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J.C. & Leadbeater, B.S.C., ed., 1994. The prymnesiophyte algae. Oxford: Oxford University Press. In press.Google Scholar
Green, J.C. & Manton, I., 1970. Studies in the fine structure and taxonomy of flagellates in the genus Pavlova. I. A revision of Pavlova gyrans, the type species. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 1113–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J.C. & Parke, M., 1975. New observations upon members of the genus Chrysotila Anand, with remarks upon their relationships within the Haptophyceae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J.C. & Pienaar, R.N., 1977. The taxonomy of the order Isochrysidales (Prymnesiophyceae) with special reference to the genera Isochrysis Parke, Dicrateria Parke and Imantonia Reynolds. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 57, 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeckel, E., 1894. Systematische Phylogenie der Protisten und Pflanzen. Berlin: Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halldal, P. & Markali, J., 1954. Observations on coccoliths of Syracosphaera mediterranea Lohm., S. pulchra Lohm., and S. molischi Schill. in the electron microscope. Journal du Conseil Permanent pour l'Exploration de la Mer, 19, 329–336.Google Scholar
Halldal, P. & Markali, J., 1955. Electron microscope studies on coccolithophorids from the Norwegian Sea, the Gulf Stream and the Mediterranean. Avhandlinger ugitt av det Norske Videnskaps Akademie i Oslo, Matematisk Naturvidenskapelig Klasse, 1955 (1), 1–30.Google Scholar
Hällfors, G. & Niemi, A., 1974. A Chrysochromulina (Haptophyceae) bloom under the ice in the Tvärminne archipelago, southern coast of Finland. Memoranda Societas Fauna et Flora Fennica, 50, 89–104.Google Scholar
Hällfors, S. & Thomsen, H.A., 1985. Chrysochromulina brachycylindra sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) from Finnish coastal waters. Nordic Journal of Botany, 5, 499–504. [Published January 22nd, 1986.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, W.W., Mohler, H.P., Roth, P.H., Schmidt, R.R. & Boudreaux, J.E., 1967. Calcareous nannoplankton zonation of the Cenozoic of the Gulf Coast and Caribbean-Antillean area, and transoceanic correlation. Transactions of the Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, 17, 428–480.Google Scholar
Hay, W.W. & Towe, K.M., 1962. Electron microscopic examination of some coccoliths from Donzacq (France). Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 55, 497–517.Google Scholar
Heimdal, B.R., 1973. Two new taxa of Recent coccolithophorids. ‘Meteor’ Forschungs-Ergebnisse, serie D, 13, 70–75.Google Scholar
Heimdal, B.R., 1982. Validation of the names of some species of Zygosphaera Kamptner. International Nannoplankton Association Newsletter, 4, 52–56.Google Scholar
Heimdal, B.R. & Gaarder, K.R., 1980. Coccolithophorids from the northern part of the eastern central Atlantic. I. Holococcolithophorids. ‘Meteor’ Forschungs-Ergebnisse, serie D, 32, 1–14.Google Scholar
Heimdal, B.R. & Gaarder, K.R., 1981. Coccolithophorids from the northern part of the eastern central Atlantic. II. Heterococcolithophorids. ‘Meteor’ Forschungs-Ergebnisse, serie D, 33, 37–69.Google Scholar
Hibberd, D.J., 1976a. The ultrastructure and taxonomy of the Chrysophyceae and Prymnesiophyceae (Haptophyceae): a survey with some new observations on the ultrastructure of the Chrysophyceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 72, 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibberd, D.J., 1976b. The fine structure of the colonial colorless flagellates Rhipidodendron splendidum Stein and Spongomonas uvella Stein with special reference to the flagellar apparatus. Journal of Protozoology, 23, 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibberd, D.J., 1976c. Observations on the ultrastructure of three new species of Cyathobodo Petersen et Hansen (C. salpinx, C. intricatus and C. simplex) and on the external morphology of Pseudodendromonas vlkii Bourrelly. Protistologica, 12, 249–261.Google Scholar
Hibberd, D.J., 1983. Ultrastructure of the colonial colourless zooflagellates Phalansterium digitatum Stein (Phalansteriida ord. nov.) and Spongomonas uvella Stein (Spongomonadida ord. nov.). Protistologica, 19, 523–535.Google Scholar
Inouye, I. & Chihara, M., 1983. Ultrastructure and taxonomy of Jomonlithus littoralis gen. et sp. nov. (Class Prymnesiophyceae), a coccolithophorid from the northwest Pacific. Botanical Magazine (Tokyo), 96, 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inouye, I. & Pienaar, R.N., 1983. Observations on the life cycle and microanatomy of Thoracosphaera heimii (Dinophyceae) with special reference to its systematic position. South African Journal of Botany, 2, 63–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jafar, S.A. & Martini, E., 1975. On the validity of the calcareous nannoplankton genus Helicosphaera. Senckenbergiana Lethaea, 56, 381–397.Google Scholar
Janin, M.-C., 1987. Micropaléontologie de concrétions polymétalliques du Pacifique central: zone Clarion-Clipperton, Chaîne Centre-Pacifique, lies de la Ligne et Archipel des Touamotou (Eocène-Actuel). Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, 152, 1–317.Google Scholar
Jerkovic, L., 1970. Noëlaerhabdus nov. gen. type d'un nouvelle famille de Coccolithophoridés fossiles: Noëlaerhabdaceae du Miocène supérieur de Yougoslavie. Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, série D, 270, 468–470.Google Scholar
Johansen, J.R., Doucette, G.J., Barclay, W.R. & Bull, J.D., 1988. The morphology and ecology of Pleurochrysis carterae var. dentata var. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae), a new coccolithophorid from an inland saline pond in New Mexico, USA. Phycologia, 27, 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, R.W. & Chamberlain, A.H.L., 1992. Vexillarius cancellifer gen. et sp. nov., and its possible affinities with other living coccolithophorids. In Nannoplankton research vol. 2 Tertiary biostratigraphy and paleoecology; Quaternary coccoliths (ed. Hamrsmid, B. and Young, J.R.), pp. 305–325. [Knihovnicka zemniho plynu a nafty, 14b.] [Actual year of publication 1993.]Google Scholar
Jordan, R.W. & Chamberlain, A.H.L., 1993. Canistrolithus valliformis gen. et sp. nov. (Syracosphaeraceae, Prymnesiophyta), a comparison with the genus Alisphaera. Phycologia, 32, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, R.W. & Kleijne, A., 1994. A classification system for living coccolithophores. In Coccolithophores (ed. Winter, A. and Siesser, W.G.), pp. 83–105. Cambridge: University Press. In press.Google Scholar
Jordan, R.W., Kleijne, A. & Heimdal, B.R., 1993. Proposed changes to the classification system of living coccolithophorids. III. International Nannoplankton Association Newsletter, 15, 18–22.Google Scholar
Jordan, R.W., Knappertsbusch, M., Simpson, W.R. & Chamberlain, A.H.L., 1991. Turrilithus latericioides gen. et sp. nov. a new coccolithophorid from the deep photic zone. British Phycological Journal, 26, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, R.W. & Young, J.R., 1990. Proposed changes to the classification system of living coccolithophorids. International Nannoplankton Association Newsletter, 12, 15–18.Google Scholar
Kalina, T., 1970. Corcontochrysis noctivaga gen. et sp. nov. (Chrysophyceae). Preslia, 42, 297–302.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1927. Beitrag zur Kenntnis adriatischer Coccolithophoriden. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 58, 173–184.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1928a. Über eine Coccolithophoride aus der ‘Alten Donau’ bei Wien. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 61, 38–44.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1928b. Über das system und die Phylogenie der Kalkflagellaten. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 64, 19–43.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1937. Neue und bemerkenswerte Coccolithineen aus dem Mittelmeer. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 89, 279–316.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1941. Die Coccolithineen der Südwestküste von Istrien. Anzeiger des Naturhistorische Museum Wien, Annalen, 51, 54–149.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1943. Zur Revision der Coccolithineen-Spezies Pontosphaera huxleyi Lohm. Anzeiger der Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wien, 80, 43–49.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1948. Coccolithen aus dem Torton des Inneralpinen Wiener Beckens. Sitzungsberichte der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Part 1, 157, 1–16.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1950. Über den submikroskopischen Aufbau der Coccolithen. Anzeiger der Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Matematische-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 87, 152–158.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1954. Untersuchungen über den Feinbau der Coccolithen. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 100, 1–90.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1956. Morphologische Betrachtungen über Skelettelemente der Coccolithineen. Österreichische Botanische Zeitschrift, 103, 142–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1958. Betrachtungen zur Systematik der Kalkflagellaten, nebst Versuch einer neuen Gruppierung der Chrysomonadales. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 103, 54–116.Google Scholar
Kamptner, E., 1963. Coccolithineen-Skelettreste aus Tiefseeablagerungen des Pazifischen Ozeans. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien, 66, 139–204.Google Scholar
Karsten, G., 1905. Das Phytoplankton des Antarktischen Meeres nach dem Material der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition 1898–1899. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer ‘Valdivia’ 1898–1899, II, 2, 1–136.Google Scholar
Klaveness, D., 1972. Coccolithus huxleyi (Lohm.) Kamptn. II. The flagellate cell, aberrant cell types, vegetative propagation and life cycles. British Phycological Journal, 7, 309–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleijne, A., 1991. Holococcolithophorids from the Indian Ocean, Red Sea, Mediterranean Sea and North Atlantic Ocean. Marine Micropaleontology, 17, 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleijne, A., 1992. Extant Rhabdosphaeraceae (coccolithophorids, class Prymnesiophyceae) from the Indian Ocean, Red Sea, Mediterranean Sea and North Atlantic Ocean. Scripta Geologica, 100, 1–63.Google Scholar
Kleijne, A., 1993. Morphology, taxonomy and distribution of extant coccolithophorids (calcareous nannoplankton). Enschede: FEBO. [Thesis submitted to the Free University of Amsterdam.]Google Scholar
Kleijne, A. & Jordan, R.W., 1990. Proposed changes to the classification system of living coccolithophorids. II. International Nannoplankton Association Newsletter, 12, 13.Google Scholar
Kleijne, A., Jordan, R.W. & Chamberlain, A.H.L., 1991. Flosculosphaera calceolariopsis gen. et sp. nov., and F. sacculus sp. nov., new coccolithophorids (Prymnesiophyceae) from the N.E. Atlantic. British Phycological Journal, 26, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kling, H.J., 1981. Chrysochromulina laurentiana: an electron microscopic study of a new species of Prymnesiophyceae from Canadian Shield lakes. Nordic Journal of Botany, 1, 551–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knappertsbusch, M., 1993. Syracosphaera noroiticus n. sp. and S. marginaporata n. sp., two new living coccolithophorids of the genus Syracosphaera (Lohmann) Gaarder. Journal of Micropalaeontology, 12, 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J.B., 1939. Notes on plankton flagellates from the Scioto River. Lloydia, 2, 128–143.Google Scholar
Lagerheim, G., 1893. Phaeocystis nov. gen., grundadt på Tetraspora Poucheti Har. Botaniska Notiser, 1893, 32–33.Google Scholar
Lagerheim, G., 1896. Über Phaeocystis Poucheti (Har.) Lagerh.; eine Planktonflagellate. Öfversigt af Kongl. Vetenskapakademiens Förhandlingar, 53, 277–288.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, B.S.C., 1972. Fine structural observations on six new species of Chrysochromulina (Haptophyceae) from Norway with preliminary observations on scale production in C. microcylindra sp. nov. Sarsia, 49, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B.S.C., 1974. Ultrastructural observations on nanoplankton collected from the coast of Jugoslavia and the Bay of Algiers, journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B.S.C. & Manton, I., 1969. Chrysochromulina camella sp. nov. and C. cymbium sp. nov., two new relatives of C. strobilus Parke and Manton. Archiv für Mikrobiologie, 68, 116–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leadbeater, B.S.C. & Manton, I., 1971. Fine structure and light microscopy of a new species of Chrysochromulina (C. acantha). Archiv für Mikrobiologie, 78, 58–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lecal, J., 1965a. Navisolenia n. g. aprili n. sp., nouveau genre de calciosolenidés. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse, 100, 422–426.Google Scholar
Lecal, J., 1965b. A propos des modalités d'élaboration des formations épineuses des Coccolithophoridés. Protistologica, 1, 63–70. [Published January, 1966.]Google Scholar
Lecal, J., 1965c. Un nouvel Hymenomonas: H. prenanti n. sp. [Coccolithophoridés]. Annales de Limnologie, 1, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecal, J., 1967. Le nannoplankton des côtes d'Israël. Hydrobiologia, 29, 305–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecal, J. & Bernheim, A., 1960. Microstructure du squelette de quelques Coccolithophorides. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de l'Afriaue du Nord, 51, 273–297.Google Scholar
Lecal-Schlauder, J., 1950. Notes préliminaires sur les Coccolithophorides d'Afrique du Nord. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de l'Afrique du Nord, 40, 160–167.Google Scholar
Lecal-Schlauder, J., 1951. Recherches morphologiques et biologiques sur les Coccolithophorides nord-africains. Annales de l'lnstitut Océanographique de Monaco, serie 2, 26, 255–362.Google Scholar
Lefort, F., 1972. Quelques caractères morphologiques de deux espèces actuelles de Braarudosphaera (Chrysophycées, Coccolithophoracées). Botaniste, série 55, 81–93.Google Scholar
Lemmermann, E. 1903. Das Phytoplankton des Meeres. II. Beitrag. Abhandlungen herausgegeben vom Naturwissenschaftlichen Verein zu Bremen, 17, 341–418.Google Scholar
Lemmermann, E., 1908. Flagellatae, Chlorophyceae, Coccosphaerales und Silicoflagellatae. Nordisches Plankton, vol. 21 (ed. Brandt, K. and Apstein, C.), pp. 1–40. Kiel & Leipzig: Lipsius & Tischer.Google Scholar
Lepailleur, H., 1970. Sur un nouveau genre de Chrysophycées: Exanthemachrysis nov. gen. (E. gayralii nov. sp.). Compte Rendu Hebdomadaire des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris, 270, 928–931.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A.R. Jr & Tappan, H., 1963. Type fixation and validation of certain calcareous nannoplankton genera. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 76, 191–196.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A.R. Jr & Tappan, H., 1966. Annotated index and bibliography of the calcareous nannoplankton. Phycologia, 5, 81–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeblich, A.R. Jr & Tappan, H., 1968. Annotated index and bibliography of the calcareous nannoplankton. II. Journal of Paleontology, 42, 584–598.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A.R. Jr & Tappan, H., 1978. The coccolithophorid genus Calcidiscus Kamptner and its synonyms. journal of Palaeontology, 52, 1390–1392.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H., 1902. Die Coccolithophoridae, eine Monographic der Coccolithen bildenden Flagellaten, zugleich ein Betrag zur Kenntnis des Mittelmeerauftriebs. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 1, 89–165.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H., 1903. Neue Untersuchungen über den Reichthum des Meeres an Plankton und über die Brauchbarkeit der verschiedenen Fangmethoden. Zugleich auch ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Mittelmeerauftriebs. Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen Abteilung Kiel, N.S., 7, 1–87.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H., 1912. Untersuchungen über das Pflanzen- und Tierleben der Hochsee, zugleich ein Bericht über die biologischen Arbeiten auf der Fahrt der ‘Deutschland’ von Bremerhaven nach Buenos Aires in der Zeit vom 7 Mai bis 7 September 1911. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Meereskunde an dem Universität, Neue Folge., A. Geogr.-naturwiss., serie 1, 1–92.Google Scholar
Lohmann, H., 1913a. Beiträge zur Charakterisierung des Tier- und Pflanzenlebens in den von der ‘Deutschland’ während ihrer Fahrt nach Buenos Ayres durchfahrenen Gebieten des Atlantischen Ozeans. II. Teil. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie, 5, 343–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, H., 1913b. Über Coccolithophoriden. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft, 23, 143–164.Google Scholar
Mangin, L., 1922. Phytoplankton antarctique. Expédition antarctique de la ‘Scotia', 1902–1904. Mémoires de l' Académie des Sciences de Paris, série 2, 57, 1–134.Google Scholar
Manton, I., 1972. Preliminary observations on Chrysochromulina mactra sp. nov. British Phycological Journal, 7, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I., 1978a. Chrysochromulina hirta sp. nov., a widely distributed species with unusual spines. British Phycological Journal, 13, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I., 1978b. Chrysochromulina tenuispina sp. nov. from Arctic Canada. British Phycological Journal, 13, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I., 1982. Chrysochromulina latilepis sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae = Haptophyceae) from the Galapagos Islands with preliminary comparisons with relevant taxa from South Africa. Botanica Marina, 25, 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I., 1983. Nanoplankton from the Galapagos Islands: Chrysochromulina discophora sp. nov. (Haptophyceae = Prymnesiophyceae), another species with exceptionally large scales. Botanica Marina, 26, 15–22.Google Scholar
Manton, I., Bremer, G. & Oates, K., 1984. Nanoplankton from the Galapagos Islands: Michaelsarsia elegans Gran and Halopappus adriaticus Schiller (Coccolithophorids) with special reference to coccoliths and their unmineralised components. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B), 305, 183–199.Google Scholar
Manton, I. & Leadbeater, B.S.C., 1974. Fine-structural observations on six species of Chrysochromulina from wild Danish marine nanoplankton, including a description of C. campanulifera sp. nov. and a preliminary summary of the nanoplankton as a whole. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter, 20, 1–26.Google Scholar
Manton, I. & Oates, K., 1975. Fine structural observations on Papposphaera Tangen from the Southern Hemisphere and on Pappomonas gen. nov. from South Africa and Greenland. British Phycological Journal, 10, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Oates, K., 1980. Polycrater galapagensis gen. et sp. nov., a putative coccolithophorid from the Galapagos Islands with an unusual aragonite periplast. British Phycological Journal, 15, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Oates, K., 1983a. Nanoplankton from the Galapagos Islands: Chrysochromulina vexillifera sp. nov. (Haptophyceae = Prymnesiophyceae), a species with semivestigial body spines. Botanica Marina, 26, 517–525.Google Scholar
Manton, I. & Oates, K., 1983b. Nanoplankton from the Galapagos Islands: two genera of spectacular coccolithophorids (Ophiaster and Calciopappus ) with special emphasis on unmineralised periplast components. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B), 300, 435–462.Google Scholar
Manton, I., Oates, K. & Course, P.A., 1981. Cylinder-scales in marine flagellates from the genus Chrysochromulina (Haptophyceae = Prymnesiophyceae) with a description of C. pachycylindra sp. nov. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Parke, M., 1962. Preliminary Observations On Scales And Their Mode Of Origin In Chrysochromulina Polylepis Sp. Nov. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 42, 565–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I. & Sutherland, J., 1975. Further observations on the genus Pappomonas Manton et Oates with special reference to P. virgulosa sp. nov. from West Greenland. British Phycological Journal, 10, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I., Sutherland, J. & McCully, M., 1976a. Fine structural observations on coccolithophorids from South Alaska in the genera Papposphaera Tangen and Pappomonas Manton and Oates. British Phycological Journal, 11, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manton, I., Sutherland, J. & Oates, K., 1976b. Arctic coccolithophorids: two species of Turrisphaera gen. nov. from West Greenland, Alaska and the Northwest Passage. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 194, 179–194.Google Scholar
Manton, I., Sutherland, J. & Oates, K., 1977. Arctic coccolithophorids: Wigwamma arctica gen. et sp. nov. from Greenland and Arctic Canada, W. annulifera sp. nov. from South Africa and South Alaska and Calciarcus alaskensis gen. et sp. nov. from S. Alaska. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 197, 145–168.Google Scholar
Markali, J. & Paasche, E., 1955. On two species of Umbellosphaera, a new marine coccolithophorid genus. Nytt Magasin for Botanikk, 4, 95–100.Google Scholar
Marlowe, I.T., Green, J.C., Neal, A.C., Brassell, S.C., Eglinton, G. & Course, P.A., 1984. Long chain (n -C37-C39) alkenones in the Prymnesiophyceae. Distribution of alkenones and other lipids and their taxonomic significance. British Phycological Journal, 19, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, E. & Müller, C., 1972. Nannoplankton aus dem nördlichen Arabischen Meer. ‘Meteor’ Forschungs-Ergebnisse, serie C, 10, 63–74.Google Scholar
Massart, J., 1920. Recherches sur les organismes inférieur. VIII. Sur la motilité des flagellates. Bulletin de l'Academie Royale de Belgique, Classe des Sciences, série 5, 6, 116–41.Google Scholar
McIntyre, A. & Bé, A.W.H., 1967. Modern Coccolithophoridae of the Atlantic Ocean. I. Placoliths and cyrtoliths. Deep-Sea Research, 14, 561–597.Google Scholar
Meyer, R.L., 1986. A proposed phylogenetic sequence for the loricate rhizopodial Chrysophyceae. In Chrysophytes: aspects and problems (ed. Kristiansen, J. and Andersen, R.A.), pp. 75–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, J.T., 1975. Hymenomonas coronata sp. nov., a new coccolithophorid from the Texas coast. Journal of Phycology, 11, 149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moestrup, Ø., 1979. Identification by electron microscopy of marine nanoplankton from New Zealand, including the description of four new species. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 17, 61–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moestrup, Ø. & Thomsen, H.A., 1986. Ultrastructure and reconstruction of the flagellar apparatus in Chrysochromulina apheles sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae = Haptophyceae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 64, 593–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C., Blanc-Vernet, L., Chamley, H. & Froget, C., 1974. Les Coccolithophorides d'une carotte Méditerranéenne. Comparaison paléoclimatologique avec les Foraminifères, les Ptéropodes et les argiles. Tethys, 6, 805–828.Google Scholar
Murray, G. & Blackman, V.H., 1898. On the nature of the Coccospheres and Rhabdospheres. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (B), 190, 427–441.Google Scholar
Nicholls, K.H., 1978. Chrysochromulina breviturrita sp. nov., a new freshwater member of the Prymnesiophyceae. Journal of Phycology, 14, 499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishida, S., 1971. Nannofossils from Japan IV. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, 83, 143–161.Google Scholar
Norris, R.E., 1965. Living cells of Ceratolithus cristatus (Coccolithophorinae). Archiv für Protistenkunde, 108, 19–24.Google Scholar
Norris, R.E., 1967. Microalgae in enrichment cultures from Puerto Penasco, Sonora, Mexico. Bulletin of the South California Academy of Science, 66, 233–250.Google Scholar
Norris, R.E., 1983. The family position of Papposphaera Tangen and Pappomonas Manton et Oates (Prymnesiophyceae) with records from the Indian Ocean. Phycologia, 22, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R.E., 1984. Indian Ocean nanoplankton. I. Rhabdosphaeraceae (Prymnesiophyceae) with a review of extant taxa. Journal of Phycology, 20, 27–41.Google Scholar
Norris, R.E., 1985. Indian Ocean nannoplankton. II. Holococcolithophorids (Calyptrosphaeraceae, Prymnesiophyceae) with a review of extant genera. Journal of Phycology, 21, 619–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, H. & Honjo, S., 1973. The distribution of oceanic coccolithophorids in the Pacific. Deep-Sea Research, 20, 355–374.Google Scholar
Okada, H. & McIntyre, A., 1977. Modern coccolithophores of the Pacific and North Atlantic Oceans. Micropaleontology, 23, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, H. & McIntyre, A., 1980. Validation of Florisphaera profunda, var. elongata (2). International Nannoplankton Association Newsletter, 2, 81.Google Scholar
Ostenfeld, C.H., 1900. Über Coccosphaera. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 23,198–200.Google Scholar
Ostenfeld, C.H., 1910. Thorosphaera, eine neue Gattung der Coccolithophoriden. Bericht der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft, 28,397–400.Google Scholar
Papenfuss, G.F., 1955. Classification of the algae. In A century of progress in the natural sciences, 1853–1953, pp. 115–224. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Parke, M, 1949. Studies on marine flagellates. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 28,255–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., 1953. A preliminary check-list of British marine algae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 32,497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, P.S., 1964. A revised check-list of British marine algae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 44,499–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, P.S., 1968. Check-list of British marine algae - second revision. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 783–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, P.S., 1976. Check-list of British marine algae - third revision. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56,527–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Manton, I., 1962. Studies on marine flagellates. VI. Chrysochromulina pringsheimii sp. nov. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 42,391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., Manton, I. & Clarke, B., 1955. Studies on marine flagellates. II. Three new species of Chrysochromulina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 34,579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., Manton, I. & Clarke, B., 1956. Studies on marine flagellates. III. Three further species of Chrysochromulina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 35,387–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., Manton, I. & Clarke, B., 1958. Studies on marine flagellates. IV. Morphology and microanatomy of a new species of Chrysochromulina. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M., Manton, I. & Clarke, B., 1959. Studies on marine flagellates. V. Morphology and microanatomy of Chrysochromulina strobilus sp. nov. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 38,169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascher, A., 1925. Die braune Algenreihe der Chrysophyceen. Archiv fur Protistenkunde, 52, 489–564.Google Scholar
Pienaar, R.N., 1976. The microanatomy of Hymenomonas lacuna sp. nov. (Haptophyceae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56,1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pienaar, R.N. & Norris, R.E., 1979. The ultrastructure of the flagellate Chrysochromulina spinifera (Fournier) comb. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) with special reference to scale production. Phycologia, 18,99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Playfair, G.I., 1918. New and rare freshwater algae. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 43,497–543.Google Scholar
Poche, F., 1913. Das system der Protozoa. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 30,125–321.Google Scholar
Pringsheim, E.G., 1955. Kleine Mitteilungen Über Flagellaten und Algen. I. Algenartige Chrysophyceen in Reinkultur. Archiv für Mikrobiologie, 21,401–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, P., 1972. Coccolithen. Kalkiges Plankton seit Jahrmillionen. Die neue Brehm Bucheri, 453, 1–99.Google Scholar
Reynolds, N., 1974. Imantonia rotunda gen. et sp. nov., a new member of the Haptophyceae. British Phycological Journal, 9, 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, P.H., 1970. Oligocene calcareous nannoplankton biostratigraphy. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 63,799–881.Google Scholar
Roth, P.H., 1973. Calcareous nannofossils Leg 17, Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project (ed. Winterer, E.L.et al.), 17, 695–795.Google Scholar
Rouchijajnen, M.I., 1966. Duae species novae e Chrysophytis mobilibus Maris Nigra. Novitates Systematicae Plantarum Non Vascularium, 3,10–15.Google Scholar
Rouchijajnen, M.I., 1972. Flagellatae marium australium nova. Novitates Systematicae Plantarum Non Vascularium, 9,11–17.Google Scholar
Scherffel, A., 1899. Phaeocystis globosa n. sp. (Vorläufige Mittheilung). Berichte der Deutschen Botanische Gesellschaft, 17, 317–318.Google Scholar
Scherffel, A., 1927. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Chrysomonadineen. II. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 57, 331–361.Google Scholar
Schiller, J., 1913. Vorläufige Ergebnisse der Phytoplankton-Untersuchungen auf den Fahrten SMS ‘Najade’ in der Adria 1911/12. I. Die Coccolithophoriden. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, 122, 597–617.Google Scholar
Schiller, J., 1925. Die planktonischen Vegetationen des adriatischen Meeres. A. Die Coccolithophoriden-Vegetation in den Jahren 1911–14. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 51, 1–130.Google Scholar
Schiller, J., 1929. Neue Chryso- und Cryptomonaden aus Altwässern der Donau bei Wien. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 66, 436–458.Google Scholar
Schiller, J., 1930. Coccolithineae. In Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, vol. 10 (ed. Rabenhorst, L.), pp. 89–267. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Schlauder, J., 1945. Recherches sur les flagellés calcaires de la baie d'Alger. Diploma, Faculté de Sciences, Université d'Alger.Google Scholar
Schmidt, O.C. 1931. II. Algen 1925–27. Mit Nachträgen aus den Jahren 1914 bis 1924. Just's Botanische Jahresberichte, 55, 20–312.Google Scholar
Schussnig, B., 1930. Ochrosphaera neapolitana nov. gen., nov. spec., eine neue Chrysomonade mit Kalkhülle. Östereichische Botanische Zeitschrifte, 79, 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, E.H.L., 1894. Coccoliths. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 6, 14, 341–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senn, G., 1900. Flagellata. In Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 1 (ed. Engler, A. and Prantl, K.), pp. 93–192. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Silva, P.C., 1960. Remarks on algal nomenclature. III. Taxon, 9, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skuja, H., 1948. Taxonomie des Phytoplanktons einiger Seen in Uppland, Schweden. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses, 9, 1–399.Google Scholar
Skvortzov, , 1961. Harbin Chrysophyta, China Boreali-Orientalis. Bulletin of the Herbarium of NorthEastern Forestry Academy, no. 3, 70 pp.Google Scholar
Sournia, A., 1988. Phaeocystis (Prymnesiophyceae): how many species? Nova Hedwigia, 47, 211–217.Google Scholar
Starmach, K., 1968. Chrysophyta I. Chrysophyceae zlotowiciowce. In Flora Stodkowodna Polski, vol. 5 (ed. Starmach, K.). Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
Starmach, K., 1985. Chrysophyceae und Haptophyceae. In Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, vol. 1 (ed. Ettl, H.et al.). Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Stein, F.R. von, 1878. Der organismus der Infusionsthiere. III. Abteilung. Die Naturgeschichte der Flagellaten oder Geisselinfusorien. 1. Hälfte. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, J.C., 1991. Calcareous nannoplankton biocoenosis: sediment trap studies in the Equatorial Atlantic, Central Pacific, and Panama Basin. In Ocean biocoenosis series no. 1 (ed. Honjo, S.), pp. 1–85. Woods Hole: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.Google Scholar
Stokes, A.C., 1885. Notes on some apparently undescribed forms of freshwater infusoria, no. 2. American journal of Science, series 3, 29, 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, A.C., 1888. Notices of some new Infusoria Flagellata from American fresh waters. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, N.S., 8, 698–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tangen, K., 1972. Papposphaera lepida, gen. nov., n. sp., a new marine coccolithophorid from Norwegian coastal waters. Norwegian Journal of Botany, 19, 171–178.Google Scholar
Tangen, K., Brand, L.E., Blackwelder, P.L. & Guillard, R.R.L., 1982. Thoracosphaera heimii (Lohmann) Kamptner is a dinophyte: observations on its morphology and life cycle. Marine Micropaleontology, 7, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappan, H., 1980. The paleobiology of plant protists. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Theodoridis, S., 1984. Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy of the Miocene and revision of the helicoliths and discoasters. Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletin, 32, 1–271.Google Scholar
Thomsen, H.A., 1977. Chrysochromulina pyramidosa sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) from Danish coastal waters. Botaniska Notiser, 130, 147–153.Google Scholar
Thomsen, H.A., 1979. Chrysochromulina cyathophora (Prymnesiophyceae), a new species from Danish coastal waters. Botaniska Notiser, 132, 71–76.Google Scholar
Thomsen, H.A., 1980a. Wigwamma scenozonion sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) from West Greenland. British Phycological Journal, 15, 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, H.A., 1980b. Quaternariella obscura gen. et sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) from West Greenland. Phycologia, 19, 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, H.A., 1980c. Two species of Trigonaspis gen. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) from West Greenland. Phycologia, 19, 218–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, H.A., Buck, K.R., Coale, S.L., Garrison, D.L. & Gowing, M.M., 1988. Nanoplanktonic coccolithophorids (Prymnesiophyceae, Haptophyceae) from the Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Nordic Journal of Botany, 8, 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, H.A. & Oates, K., 1978. Balaniger balticus gen. et sp. nov. (Prymnesiophyceae) from Danish coastal waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 773–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, H.A., Østergaard, J.B. & Hansen, L.E., 1991. Heteromorphic life histories in arctic coccolithophorids (Prymnesiophyceae). Journal of Phycology, 27, 634–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veer, J. Van Der, 1972. Pavlova helicata (Haptophyceae), a new species from the Frisian island Schiermonnikoog, the Netherlands. Nova Hedwigia, 23, 131–159.Google Scholar
Veer, J. Van Der, 1976. Pavlova calceolata (Haptophyceae), a new species from the Tamar Estuary, Cornwall, England. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veer, J. Van Der & Leewis, R.J., 1977. Pavlova ennorea sp. nov., a haptophycean alga with a dominant palmelloid phase, from England. Ada Botanica Neerlandica, 26, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlk, W., 1942. Über eine neue farblose Monade Peltomonas volitans nov. gen. nov. sp. Archiv für Protistenkunde, 95, 76–80. [Relevant part of journal published June 1941.]Google Scholar
Voigt, , 1902. Neue Organismen aus Plöner Gewässern. Forschungberichte des biologische Station der Plön, 9, 33–46.Google Scholar
Wallich, G.C., 1877. Observations on the coccosphere. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 4, 19, 342–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcoxon, J.A., 1970. Cyclococcolithina Wilcoxon nom. nov. (nom. subst. pro Cyclococcolithus Kamptner, 1954). Tulane University, Tulane Studies in Geology and Paleontology, 8, 82–83.Google Scholar
Wujek, D.E. & Gardiner, W.E., 1985. Chrysophyceae (Mallomonadaceae) from Florida. II. New species of Paraphysomonas and the prymnesiophyte Chrysochromulina. Florida Scientist, 48, 59–63.Google Scholar