Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T00:34:35.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Interrelationships of Zooplankton and Phytoplankton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Richard Bainbridge
Richard Bainbridge
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy, University of Oxford, and Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An apparatus in which it is possible to observe the horizontal migrations of zooplankton in gradients of phytoplankton is described, and an account given of its use in experiments involving various organisms. A preliminary search for toxic organisms is also described.

The experiments comprise a demonstration of a migration by various animals into concentrations ofthe diatoms Skeletonema, Thalassiosira, Biddulphia, Nitzschia and various mixed cultures and the flagellates Chlamydomonas, Peridinium, Dicrateria, K, and Oxyrrhis. Cultures of Rhodomonas and Gymnodinium II are found to produce the opposite effect, and no reaction towards Lauderia, Coscinodiscus, Eucampia, Syracosphaera and Exuviaella could be shown. Results with bacteria cultures andvarious inorganic gradients are also discussed.

A second apparatus in which it is possible to observe the vertical migrations of zooplankton in the presence and absence of phytoplankton is also described, and an account given of experiments in it involving various organisms.

The experiments comprise a demonstration that greater numbers of animals swim up in the presence of mixed phytoplankton cultures, Coscinodiscus, Skeletonema, Ditylum, Chlamydomonas, Gymnodinium I and II and Oxyrrhis than in unenriched water. Flagellate One has no effect and Chlorella possibly depresses the number swimming up.

Under-water observations on the swimming movements of some of the animals used are described. The possible application of the observations towards resolving the problem of the inverse distribution of phytoplankton and zooplankton in the sea is discussed, and the hypothesis is proposed that this may be accounted for by a combination of migration and grazing. It is considered that plankton animals must migrate both horizontally and vertically into patches of phytoplankton and, when present in sufficient numbers, graze these down very quickly.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , October 1953 , pp. 385 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J. 1919. A contribution to the quantitative study of plankton. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 12, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, E. J. & Nelson, E. W. 1910. On the artificial culture of marine plankton organisms. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 8, pp. 421–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, W. E. 1921. Preliminary statistical studies of marine phyto-plankton of the San Diego region, California. Special Publ. Bernice P. Bishop Museum, No. 7, PP. 537–54.Google Scholar
Allen, W. E. 1928. Quantitative studies on inshore marine diatoms and dinoflagellates collected in southern California in 1924. Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanog., Vol. 1, No. 15, pp. 347–56.Google Scholar
Allen, W. E. 1938. Red water along the west coast of the United States in 1938. Science, Vol. 88, pp. 55–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alvik, G. 1934. Plankton-Algen norwegischer Austernpollen. I. Systematik und Vorkommen der Arten. Bergens Museums Arbok, Naturv. rekke, No. 6, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Bainbridge, R. 1949. Movement of zooplankton in diatom gradients. Nature, Vol. 163, pp. 910–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bainbridge, R. 1952. Underwater observations on the swimming of marine zooplankton. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 31, pp. 107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. & Marshall, S. M. 1951. On the variability of replicate plankton samples and some applications of ‘contagious’ series to the statistical distribution of catches over restricted periods. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 30, pp. 233–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigelow, H. B. 1924. Plankton of the offshore waters of the Gulf of Maine. Bull. Bureau Fisheries, Vol. 11, Pt. 11, 509 pp.Google Scholar
Brongersma-Sanders, M. 1948. The importance of upwelling water to vertebrate paleontology and oil geology. Kon. Ned. Ak. Wet., Verh. Afd. Nat. (Tweede Sectie), D1, 45, No. 4, pp. 1–112.Google Scholar
Cole, H. A. 1939. Further experiments in the breeding of oysters (Ostrea edulis) in tanks. Min. Agric. Fish., Fishery Invest., Ser. II, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
Cole, H. A. & Knight-Jones, E. W. 1949. Quantitative estimation of marine nannoplankton. Nature, Vol. 164, pp. 694–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. 1839. A naturalist's voyage. Journal of the researches into the natural history and geology of the countries visited during the voyage of H.M.S. ‘Beagle’ round the world. Under the command of Capt. Fitzroy, R.N., 551 pp. London, John Murray, 1889 (fourth edition).Google Scholar
Davis, C. C. 1948. Gymnodinium brevis sp.nov. A cause of discoloured water and animal mortality in the Gulf of Mexico. Bot. Gazette, Vol. 109, No. 3, pp. 358–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, R. H. 1939. The control of diatom populations by grazing. Journ. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 14, pp. 210–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, J. L. 1937. Feeding rate of Calanus finmarchicus in relation to environmental conditions. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. 72, pp. 233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaarder, K. R. 1938. Phytoplankton Studies from the Tromso District 1930–31. Tromso Museums Arshefter Naturh. avd Nr. 11, Vol. 55 (1932), No. 1, pp. 1–159.Google Scholar
Gaarder, T. & Spärck, R. 1932. Hydrographisch-biochemische Untersuchungen in norwegischen Austern-Pollen. Bergens Museums Arbok, 1932, Naturv. rekke, Nr. 1, pp. 1–144.Google Scholar
Gauld, D. T. 1951. The grazing rate of planktonic copepods. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 29, pp. 695–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gran, H. H. 1912. The plankton production of the north European waters in the spring of 1912. Bull. Planktonique, pp. 5–142.Google Scholar
Gunther, G.Williams, R. H.Davis, C. C. & Walton Smith, F. G. 1948. Catastrophic mass mortality of marine animals and coincident phytoplankton bloom on the west coast of Florida, November 1946 to August 1947. Ecol. Monographs, Vol. 18, pp. 309–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, R. 1924. Crustacea, Pt. IX. Decapod Larvae. British Antarctic (‘Terra Nova’) Exp. 1910. Natural History Rep. Zoology, Vol. 8, pp. 37–202.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. 1936. Observations on the uneven distribution of the oceanic plankton. Discovery Rep., Vol. 11, pp. 511–38.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. & Bainbridge, R. 1951. Vertical migration of plankton animals. Nature, Lond., Vol. 168, pp. 327–28. (Substance of a paper read at the British Association.)Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. & Gunther, E. R. 1935. The plankton of the South Georgia whaling grounds and adjacent waters, 1926–27. Discovery Rep., Vol. 11, pp. 1–456.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. & Paton, W. N. 1947. Experiments on the vertical migration of plankton animals. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 26, pp. 467–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, T. J. 1934. On the phytoplankton of the south-west Atlantic and the Bellingshausen Sea, 1929–31. Discovery Rep., Vol. 8, pp. 1–268.Google Scholar
Hart, T. J. 1942. Phytoplankton periodicity in Antarctic surface waters. Discovery Rep., Vol. 21, pp. 261–356.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. W. 1934. Annual variation of planktonic vegetation, 1933. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 19, pp. 775–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, H. W. 1937 Note on selective feeding by Calanus. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 22, pp. 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, H. W.Cooper, L. H. N.Lebour, M. V. & Russell, F. S. 1935. Plankton production and its control. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 20, pp. 407–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornell, J. 1908. The results of a fishery cruise along the Malabar coast and to the Laccadive islands in 1908. Madras Fishery Invest. Bull., No. 4, pp. 71–126.Google Scholar
Hornell, J. 1917. A new protozoan cause of widespread mortality among marine fishes. Madras Fishery Invest. Bull., No. 11, Rep. No. 2, pp. 53–66.Google Scholar
Johnstone, J. 1908. Conditions of Life in the Sea, 332 pp. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Langmuir, I. 1938. Surface motion of water induced by wind. Science, Vol. 87, pp. 119–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, C. E. 1936. On certain interrelations between phytoplankton and zoo-plankton under experimental conditions. Journ. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer., Vol. 11, pp. 343–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, C. E. 1940. Ecological investigations with the continuous plankton recorder: the phytoplankton in the southern North Sea, 1932–37. Hull Bull. Mar. Ecol., Vol. 1, pp. 73–170.Google Scholar
Lucas, C. E. 1947. The ecological effects of external metabolites. Biol. Rev., Vol. 22, pp. 270–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lucas, C. E. 1949 External metabolites and ecological adaptation. Symposia of the Soc. for Exp. Biol. No. III. Selective Toxicity and Antibiotics, pp. 336–56.Google Scholar
Lucas, C. E. & Macnae, W. 1941. Continuous plankton records. Phytoplankton in the North Sea, 1938–1939, Part I. Diatoms. Hull Bull. Mar. Ecol., Vol. 2, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
Macdonald, R. 1927. Food and habits of Meganyctiphanes norvegica. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 14, pp. 753–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mare, M. F. 1940. Plankton production off Plymouth and the mouth of the English Channel in 1939. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 24, pp. 461–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, S. M. 1947. An experiment in marine fish cultivation: III. The plankton of a fertilised loch. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinb., B, Vol. 43, Pt. I (No. 3), pp. 21–33.Google Scholar
Rae, K. M. & Fraser, J. H. 1941. The copepoda of the southern North Sea 1932–1937. Hull Bull. Mar. Ecol., Vol. 1, pp. 171–238.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S. 1927. The vertical distribution of marine macroplankton. V. The distribution of animals caught in the ring trawl in the daytime in the Plymouth area. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 14, pp. 557–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, R. E. 1930. The influence of Phaeocystis on the migrations of the herring. Min. Agric. Fish., Fishery Invest., Ser. II, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Savage, R. E. & Hardy, A. C. 1935. Phytoplankton and the herring. Part 1. 1921–1932. Min. Agric. Fish., Fishery Invest., Ser. II, Vol. 14, No. 2 (1934), pp. 1–73.Google Scholar
Savage, R. E. & Wimpenny, R. S. 1936. Phytoplankton and the herring. Part 2, 1933 and 1934. Min. Agric. Fish., Fishery Invest., Ser. II, Vol. 15, No. 1 (1936), pp. 1–88.Google Scholar
Scoresby, W. 1820. An Account of the Arctic Regions with a History and Description of the Northern Whale-fishery. 3 vols. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Steemann Nielsen, E. 1937. On the relation between the quantities of phytoplankton and zooplankton in the sea. Journ. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer., Vol. 12, pp. 147–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suffren, J. R. 1951. Discoloured water, East China Sea. The Marine Observer, Vol. 21, No. 153, p. 155.Google Scholar
Tattersall, W. M. & Tattersall, o. S. 1951. The British Mysidacea, 460 pp. London.Google Scholar
Wimpenny, R. S. 1936. The distribution, breeding and feeding of some important plankton organisms of the south-west North Sea in 1934, Part I. Min. Agric. Fish., Fishery Invest., Ser. II, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
Woodcock, A. H. 1944. A theory of surface water motion deduced from the wind-induced motion of the Physalia. Journ. Mar. Res., Vol. 5, pp. 196–205.Google Scholar