Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-8l2sj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:44:06.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal And Spatial Variation of Epilithic Micro Algal Distribution and Abundance and its Ingestion By Patella Vulgata on A Moderately Exposed Rocky Shore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. S. Hill  and
S. J. Hawkins
S. J. Hawkins
Affiliation:
Port Erin Marine Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Port Erin, Isle of Man
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Microbial films represent the site at which grazers exert their influence upon the recruitment of settling macroalgae and animals. The overall purpose of this study of seasonal and spatial variation in abundance and composition of epilithic microbial films was to relate such patterns to macrobenthic community dynamics within the Fucus-bar- nacle mosaic characteristic of moderately exposed rocky shores on the Isle of Man. Additionally selective grazing in Patella vulgata was examined by comparing dietary and epilithic microalgal assemblages and how this varied seasonally and spatially within the mosaic. Chlorophyll analysis was used as an index of microalgal standing crop while SEM allowed in situ estimation of microalgal abundance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , May 1991 , pp. 403 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aleem, A. A. 1950. Distribution and ecology of British marine littoral diatoms.Journal of Ecology, 38, 75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castenholz, R.W. 1963. An experimental study of the vertical distribution of littoral marine diatoms. Limnology and Oceanography, 8, 450–462.Google Scholar
Castenholz, R.W. 1967. Seasonal ecology of non-planktonic marine diatoms on the western coast of Norway.Sarsia, 29, 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creese, R.G. 1982. The distribution and abundance of the acmaeid limpet Patelloidea latistrigata and its interaction with barnacles.Oecologia, 52, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croudace, C.P. 1987. Temporal and Spatial Variation of Chlorophyll Biomass and Diatom Composition of the Microalgal Film at Battery Point, Portishead, UK and its Relevance in the Diet of Patella vulgata. MSc thesis, Bristol University.Google Scholar
Cubit, J.D. 1984. Herbivory and the seasonal abundance of algae on a high intertidal rocky shore. Ecology 65, 1904–1917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartnoll, R.G. & Hawkins, S.J. 1985. Patchiness and fluctuations on moderately exposed rocky shores. Ophelia 24, 53–63.Google Scholar
Hartnoll, R.G. & Wright, J.R 1977. Foraging movements and homing in the limpetPatella vulgata L. Animal Behaviour, 25, 806–810.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J 1981a. The influence ofPatella grazing on the fucoid-barnacle mosaic in moderately exposed rocky shores. Kieler Meeresforsch Sonderheim, 5, 537–543.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J. 1981b. The influence of season and barnacles on the algal colonisation ofPatella vulgata exclusion areas. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 1–15.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J. & Hartnoll, R.G. 1982. The influence of barnacle cover on the numbers, growth and behaviour of Patella vulgata on a vertical pier. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 62, 855–867.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J. & Hartnoll, R.G. 1983a. Grazing of intertidal algal by marine invertebrates. Oceanography and Marine Biology, an Annual Review, 21, 195–282.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J. & Hartnoll, R.G. 1983b. Changes in a rocky shore community: an evaluation of monitoring. Marine Environmental Research 9, 131–181.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J.Watson, D.C.Hill, A.S.Harding, S.P.Kyriakides, M.A.Hutchinson, S. & Norton, T.A. 1989. A comparison of feeding mechanisms in microphagous herbivorous intertidal prosobranchs in relation to resource partitioning. Journal ofMolluscan Studies. 55, 151–165.Google Scholar
Hill, A.S. 1990. The Grazing of Microbial Films on Moderately Exposed Shores on the Isle of Man. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Hill, A.S. & Hawkins, S.J. 1990. An investigation of methods for sampling microbial films on rocky shores. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 70, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hmso, 1986. The determination of chlorophylla in aquatic environments. In Methods for the examination of water and associated materials, vol. 4, section 2. HMSO.Google Scholar
Hruby, T.& Norton, T.A 1979. Algal colonisation in the Firth of Clyde.Journal of Ecology, 67, 65–77.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. & Russell-Hunter, W.D 1983. Bioenergetic and community changes in intertidal aufwuchs grazed by Littorina littorea. Ecology, 64, 761–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivlev, V.S. 1961.Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes. Newhaven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jernakoff, P. 1983. Factors affecting the recruitment of algae in a midshore region dominated by barnacles. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 67, 17–31Google Scholar
Jernakoff, P. 1985. An experimental evaluation of the influence of barnacles, crevices and seasonal patterns of grazing on algal diversity and cover in an intertidal barnacle zone. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 88, 287–302.Google Scholar
Kitting, C.L. 1980. Herbivore-plant interactions of individual limpets maintaining a mixed diet of intertidal marine algae. Ecological Monographs 50, 527–550.Google Scholar
Klump, D.W. & McKinnon, A.D. 1989. Temporal and spatial patterns in primary production of a coral reef epilithic algal community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 131, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, R. 1986. Supply-side ecology. Science, New York, 234, 25–27.Google Scholar
Little, C.Williams, G.A.Morritt, D.Perrins, J.M. & Stirling, P. 1988. Foraging behaviour of Patella vulgata L. in an Irish sea-lough.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 120, 1–21.Google Scholar
Little, C.Morritt, D.Paterson, D.M.Stirling, P. & Williams, G.A. 1990. Preliminary observations on factors affecting foraging activity in the limpet Patella vulgata. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 70, 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubchenco, J 1978. Plant species diversity in a marine intertidal community: importance of a herbivore food preference and competitive abilities.American Naturalist,112, 23–39.Google Scholar
Lubchenco, J. 1983. Littorina and fucus: effects of herbivores, substratum heterogeneity, and plant escapes during succession. Ecology, 64, 1116–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubchenco, J. & Cubit, J.D. 1980. Heteromorphic life histories of certain marine algae as adaptations to variations in herbivory. Ecology, 61, 676–687.Google Scholar
Lubchenco, J. & Gaines, S.D. 1981. A unified approach to marine plant-herbivore interaction. I. Populations and communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 12, 405–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubchenco, J. & Menge, B.A. 1978. Community development and persistence in a low rocky intertidal zone. Ecological Monographs, 48, 67–94.Google Scholar
Maclulich, J.H. 1986. Experimental evaluation of methods for sampling and assaying intertidal epilithic microalgae.Marine Ecology Progress Series, 34, 275–280.Google Scholar
Maclulich, J.H. 1987. Variations in the density and variety of intertidal epilithic microflora. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 40, 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclntire, Cd.& Moore, W.W 1977. Marine littoral diatoms: ecological considerations. In The Biology of Diatoms(ed. Werner, D.) pp. 333–371. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications. [Botanical Monographs, vol. 13.]Google Scholar
Mclntire, Cd. & Overton, W.S. 1971. Distributional patterns in assemblages of attached diatoms from Yaquina estuary, Oregon. Ecology, 52, 758–777.Google Scholar
Meddis, R. 1984. Statistics Using Ranks: A Unified Approach. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Medlin, L.K. 1981. Effects of grazers on epiphytic diatom communities. Proceedings of the 6th International Diatom Symposium, Budapest, 1980 (ed. Ross, R), pp319–412. Koenigstein: OttoKoeltz.Google Scholar
Menge, J.L. & Menge, B.A. 1974. Role of resource allocation, aggression and spatial heterogeneity in coexistence of two competing intertidal starfish. Ecological Monographs, 44, 189–209.Google Scholar
Nicotri, M.E 1977. Grazing effects of four marine intertidal herbivores on the microflora.Ecology 58, 1020–1032.Google Scholar
Norusis, M.J. 1985. Spss1. Advanced Statistics Guide. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Orton, J.H.Southward, A.J. & Dodd, J.M. 1956. Studies On The Breeding Biology Of Limpets. Ii The Breeding Of Patella Vulgata L. In Britain. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 35, 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E.C 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections, journal of Theoretical Biology, 13, 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaelli, D. 1985. Functional Feeding Groups Of Some Intertidal Molluscs Defined By Gut Contents Analysis. Journal of Molluscan Studies. 51, 233–239.Google Scholar
Riznyk, R.Z.Jeffrey, I.E. & Libby, R.C 1978. Production of epibenthic diatoms in a southern Californian impounded estuary. Journal of Phycology, 14, 273–279.Google Scholar
Roughgarden, J.Gaines, S.D. & Pacala, S.W. 1987. Supply side ecology: the role of physical transport processes. In Organisation of Communities: Past and Present (ed. Gee, J.H.R. and Giller, P.S.) pp. 491–518. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G.P 1988a. K-systems analysis for determining the factors influencing benthic microfloral productivity in a Louisiana estuary, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 43, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, G.P. 1988b. A comparison of benthic microfloral production on the West and Gulf coasts of the United States: an introduction to the dynamic K-systems model. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 43, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southward, A.J. 1953. The ecology of some rocky shores in the south of the Isle of Man.Proceedings and Transactions of the Liverpool Biological Society 59, 1–50.Google Scholar
Steneck, R.S. & Watling, L. 1982. Feeding capabilities and limitations of herbivorous molluscs: a functional group approach. Marine Biology, 68, 299–319.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. 1979. The ecology of intertidal gastropods. Advances in Marine Biology, 16, 111–210.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. 1981. Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology. Oceanography and Marine Biology, an Annual Review, 19, 513–605.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. 1984. The vertical distribution and seasonal abundance of intertidal microalgae on a rocky shore in New South Wales. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 78, 199–220.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J.Denley, E. J. & Moran, M. J 1983. Experimental analyses of the structure and dynamics of mid-shore rocky intertidal communities in New South Wales. Oecologia, 56, 202–219.Google Scholar
Underwood, A. J. & Fairweather, P.G 1989. Supply-side ecology and benthic marine assemblages. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 16–19.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. & Jernakoff, P. 1981. Effects of interactions between algae and grazing gastropods in the structure of a low-shore intertidal algal community. Oecologia, 48, 221–233.Google Scholar
Van Den Hoek, C. 1958. The algal micro vegetation in and on barnacle shells collected along the Dutch and French coasts. Blumea 9, 206–214.Google Scholar
Wahl, M 1989. Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 58, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar