Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:54:40.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Schedophilus Medusophagus (Pisces: Stromateoidei)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Q. Bone  and
C. E. R. Brook
Q. Bone
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
C. E. R. Brook
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Stromateoid fishes form a small group among the Perciformes, characterized by remarkable toothed saccular outgrowths in the gullet just behind the last gill arch (Haedrich, 1967). Most are associated with medusae when young but are poorly known as adults. In addition to the diagnostic oesophageal teeth, a striking feature of many stromateoids is the curious subdermal canal system, whose function is unknown and whose structure has not been described in detail. The present note describes observations upon the biology of Schedophilus medusophagus Cocco, and upon the structure of its integument.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , November 1973 , pp. 753 - 761
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bone, Q., 1972. Buoyancy and hydrodynamic function of integument in the castor oil fish, Ruvettus pretiosus (Pisces: Gempylidae). Copeia, 1, 78–87.Google Scholar
Cocco, A., 1839. Sopra un nuovo genere di pesci della famiglia dei Centrolofini e di una nuova specie di Trachurus. L'Innominato, Messina, 3, 56–9.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J. & Marshall, N. B., 1958. The buoyancy of bathypelagic fishes without a swim-bladder. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 753–67.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, J. D. F. & Bonde, C. Von, 1923. The stromateidae (butter fishes) collected by the S.S. ‘Pickle’. Fisheries and Marine Biological Survey Union of South Africa, Report no. 3, for the year 1922. Special Reports, IV, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Haedrich, R. L., 1967. The stromateoid fishes: systematics and a classification. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 135, 31–139.Google Scholar
Horn, M. L., 1970 a. Systematics and biology of the stromateid fishes of the genus Peprilus. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 140, 165–262.Google Scholar
Horn, M. L., 1970 b. The swimbladder as a juvenile organ in stromateoid fishes. Breviora, no. 359, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Jakubowski, M. & Oliva, O., 1967. Note on pearl organs of the stone loach Noemacheilus barbatulus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Osteichthyes, Cobitidae). Acta Societatis zoologicae bohemoslavicae, 31, 25–7.Google Scholar
Jarret, A., Spearman, R. I. & Hardy, J. A., 1959. The histochemistry of keratinization. British Journal of Dermatology, 71, 277–95.Google Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1952. Reports of the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948–9. 2. Medusae collected by the Lund University Chile Expedition, 1948–9. Lunds universitets drsskrift. N.F. Avd. 2, 47, 1–19.Google Scholar
Mansueti, R., 1963. Symbiotic behaviour between small fishes and jellyfishes, with new data on that between the stromateid Peprilus alepidotus, and the scyphomedusa Chrysaora quinquecirrha. Copeia, 1, 40–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, C. T., 1902. A revision of the fishes of the family Stromateidae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 10 (56), 115–31.Google Scholar
Walters, V., 1963. The trachipterid integument and an hypothesis on its hydrodynamic function. Copeia, no. 2, pp. 260–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitear, M., 1970. The skin surface of bony fishes. Journal of Zoology. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 160, 437–54.Google Scholar