Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:56:33.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Length at maturity and relationship between weight and total length of five deep-sea fishes from the, Andaman and Nicobar Islands of India, North-eastern Indian Ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2020

Mullasseri Sileesh Open the ORCID record for Mullasseri Sileesh [Opens in a new window] ,
B. Madhusoodana Kurup  and
Alphi Korath
Mullasseri Sileesh*
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Science and Technology, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Cochin, India
B. Madhusoodana Kurup
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Science and Technology, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Cochin, India
Alphi Korath
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Science and Technology, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Cochin, India
*
Author for correspondence: M. S. Sileesh, E-mail: sileeshm@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have estimated the length at maturity and length-weight relationships for five fish species inhabiting the deep-sea from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands off the Indian coast between 295–650 m deep in a trawl survey carried out in March–April 2017. Hauls were carried out by a high-speed Demersal Trawl Crustacean Version trawl net and analysis was performed for a total of 832 specimens. Length at first maturity of the five deep-sea fish species ranged from 14.28–105.73 cm while length at 90% maturity was in the range 17.87–159.83 cm. The length at maturity of the fish are Alepocephalus bicolor (male = 66.09, female = 105.73), Bathyclupea hoskynii (m = 15.14, f = 14.15), Chlorophthalmus corniger (m = 17.54, f = 15.31), Neoepinnula orientalis (m = 20.76, f = 16.76), and Neoscopelus microchir (m = 14.28, f = 15.40). The b value in the length-weight relationship ranged from 0.69–2.60, i.e. Alepocephalus bicolor (m = 1.93, f = 1.62), Bathyclupea hoskynii (m = 3.5, f = 1.66), Chlorophthalmus corniger (m = 2.07, f = 1.56), Neoepinnula orientalis (m = 2.86, f = 2.46) and Neoscopelus microchir (m = 0.89, f = 0.49). Based on these results, the b value showed an allometric relationship with length for all species studied, because these species have a similar morphometry, i.e. a flattened back. Since they are primary or secondary consumers at the bottom of consumer food webs, their roles are as predators of small–medium prey and as prey of top predators of food web chains.

Keywords

Deep-sea fishlength at maturitylength-weight relationshipNorth-eastern Indian Oceanreproductive biologyreproductive morphometry
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 100 , Issue 4 , June 2020 , pp. 639 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, PB (1980) Life history patterns in marine fishes and their consequences for fisheries management. Fishery Bulletin 78, 1–12.Google Scholar
Adams, DK, McGillicuddy, DJ, Zamudio, L, Thurnherr, AM, Liang, X, Rouxel, O, German, CR and Mullineaux, LS (2011) Surface-generated mesoscale eddies transport deep-sea products from hydrothermal vents. Science (New York, N.Y.) 332, 580–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agostinho, AA (1985) Estrutura da população, idade, crescimento e reprodução de Rhinelepis aspera (Agassiz, 1829) (Osteichthyes, Loricariidae) do rio Paranapanema. Tese de Doutorado. Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 229.Google Scholar
Alcock, AW (1899) A Descriptive Catalogue of the Indian Deep-sea Fishes in the Indian Museum. International Science Publisher.Google Scholar
Aneesh Kumar, KV, Thomy, R, Deepa, KP, Hashim, M and Sudhakar, M (2016) Length–weight relationship of six deep-sea fish species from the shelf regions of western Bay of Bengal and Andaman waters. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 32, 1334–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayyappan, S (2011) Handbook of Fisheries and Aquaculture. New Delhi: ICAR.Google Scholar
Bailey, NTJ (2007) Statistical Methods in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beni, N, Ganga, U and Sobhana, KS (2017) Biological aspects of the sack fish, Neoepinnula orientalis from southeastern Arabian Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 59, 98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beverton, RJH and Holt, SJ (1957) On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Cartes, JE (1994) Influence of depth and season on the diet of the deep-water aristeid Aristeus antennatus along the continental slope (400 to 2300 m) in the Catalan Sea (western Mediterranean). Marine Biology 120, 639–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartes, JE (1998) Dynamics of the bathyal benthic boundary layer in the northwestern Mediterranean: depth and temporal variations in macrofaunal–megafaunal communities and their possible connections within deep-sea trophic webs. Progress in Oceanography 41, 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deepu, AV, Haridas, DV and Kurup, BM (2007) Catch and biology of Alepocephalus bicolor (Alcock, 1891) from the southwest coast of India. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 49, 239–242.Google Scholar
Divya, T, Hashim, M and Jayaprakash, AA (2007) Distribution and biology of the deep-sea eel, Gavialiceps taeniola along the continental slope off Indian EEZ. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 49, 81–85.Google Scholar
Fischer, W and Bianchi, G (1984) FAO Species Identification Sheets for Fishery Purposes. Western Indian Ocean (Fishing Area 51). Prepared and printed with the support of the Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA). Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Forberg, KG (1983) Maturity classification and growth of capelin, Mallotus villosus villosus (M), oocytes. Journal of Fish Biology 20, 485–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, R and Pauly, D (2017) FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication.Google Scholar
Goode, GB and Bean, TH (1895) Oceanographic Ichthyology. Indian reprint 1984. Delhi: Narendra Publishing House.Google Scholar
Hossain, MY, Jasmine, S, Ibrahim, AHM, Ahmed, ZF, Rahman, MM and Ohtomi, J (2009) Length-weight and length-length relationship of 10 small fish species from the Ganges, Bangladesh. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 25, 117–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayaprakash, AA, Kurup, BM, Sreedhar, U, Venu, S, Thankappan, D, Manjebrayakath, H, Pachu, VA, Thampy, P and Sudhakar, S (2006) Distribution, diversity, length-weight relationship and recruitment pattern of deep-sea finfishes and shellfishes in the shelf-break area off southwest Indian EEZ. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 48, 56–67.Google Scholar
Kurup, BM, Jiji, T and Venu, S (2005) Distribution and biology of Chlorophthalmus bicornis Norman, beyond 250 m depth off the south west coast in the Indian EEZ. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India 47, 57–62.Google Scholar
Le Cren, ED (1951) The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). Journal of Animal Ecology 20, 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollet, HF, Cliff, G, Pratt, HL and Stevens, JD (2000) Reproductive biology of the female shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus Rafinesque, 1810, with comments on the embryonic development of lamnoids. Fishery Bulletin USA 98, 299–318.Google Scholar
Morey, G, Moranta, J, Massutí, E, Grau, A, Linde, M, Riera, F and Morales-Nin, B (2003) Weight-length relationships of littoral to lower slope fishes from the Western Mediterranean. Fisheries Research 62, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neer, JA and Cailliet, GM (2001) Aspects of the life history of the Pacific electric ray, Torpedo californica (Ayres). Copeia 3, 842–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolskii, GV (1969) Theory of Fish Population Dynamics. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Qasim, SZ (1973) An appraisal of the studies on maturation and spawning in marine teleosts from the Indian waters. Indian Journal of Fisheries 20, 166–181.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2019) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Ricker, WE (1973) Linear regressions in fishery research. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 30, 409–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Y-J, Rochet, M-J, Jennings, S, Field, JG and Gislason, H (2005) Using size-based indicators to evaluate the ecosystem effects of fishing. ICES Journal of Marine Science 62, 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, MM and Heemstra, PC (1986) Smith's Sea Fishes. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, RR and Rohlf, FJ (1981) Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 4th Edn. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Sreedhar, U, Sudhakar, GVS and Meenakumari, B (2013) Length-weight relationship of deep-sea demersal fishes from the Indian EEZ. Indian Journal of Fisheries 60, 123–125.Google Scholar
Thomas, J, Venu, S and Kurup, BM (2003) Length-weight relationship of some deep-sea fish inhabiting the continental slope beyond 250 m depths along the west coast of India. Naga, Worldfish Center Quarterly 26, 17–21.Google Scholar
Vazzoler, AEAM (1996) Biologia da reprodução de peixes teleósteos: teoria e prática. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá., 196.Google Scholar
Zar, JH (1999) Biostatistical Analysis, 4th Edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar