Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T08:48:46.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crab-eating in the diamondback terrapin Malaclemys terrapin: dealing with dangerous prey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

John Davenport
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, University College of North Wales, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd, LL59 5EH
Martha Spikes
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, University College of North Wales, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd, LL59 5EH
Sarah M. Thornton
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, University College of North Wales, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd, LL59 5EH
Bridget O. Kelly
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, University College of North Wales, Marine Science Laboratories, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd, LL59 5EH

Extract

Male diamondback terrapins, Malademys terrapin (190–240 g; 101–117 mm carapace length; 11–8 ±0–6 mm maximum jaw gape) selected small littorinids (<12 mm shell height) and mussels (<30 mm shell length) when offered prey of a range of sizes (at 26°C and 34‰. Jaw gape appeared to be the main constraint on feeding on molluscs. Responses to crabs were complex. Small crabs (10–25 mm carapace width) were eaten whole. Medium-sized crabs (30–50 mm carapace width) were ‘cropped’ (i.e. walking legs were eaten without killing the crabs). Large crabs (52–75 mm carapace width) were usually avoided, though terrapins sometimes took legs from pairs 3 or 4. Experiments with medium-sized crabs showed that diamondbacks evaluated crabs visually before attacking and preferred to eat crabs without chelipeds, rather than crabs with one or two chelipeds. Terrapins carried out attacks on medium-sized crabs from the side or rear and preferentially cropped leg pair 4 (the furthest from the chelipeds), even though leg pair 4 was significantly less valuable energetically than other leg pairs. Evidence is presented to show that cropping behaviour allows terrapins to exploit crabs which are too large to eat whole because of the constraints of jaw gape and the hard, smooth surface of the crab cephalothorax. Limb cropping is as energetically profitable as eating small crabs whole, but the threat posed by chelipeds causes terrapins to attack crab prey in the order small>medium>large.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coker, R.E., 1906. The cultivation of the diamondback terrapin. Bulletin of the North Carolina Geological and Economic Survey, 14, 169.Google Scholar
Crane, J., 1975. Fiddler crabs of the world. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, J. & Macedo, E.-A., 1990. Behavioural osmotic control in the euryhaline diamondback terrapin Malaclemys terrapin: responses to low salinity and rainfall. Journal of Zoology, 220, 487496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, J. & Wong, T.M., 1986. Observations on the water economy of the estuarine turtles Batagur baska (Gray) and Callagur borneoensis (Schlegel & Muller) Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 84A, 703707.Google Scholar
Davenport, J., Wong, T.M. & East, J., 1992. Feeding and digestion in the omnivorous estuarine turtle Batagur baska (Gray). Herpetological Journal, 2, in press.Google Scholar
Dunson, W.A., 1970. Some aspects of electrolyte and water balance in three estuarine reptiles, the diamondback terrapin, American and ‘salt water’ crocodiles. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 32, 161174.Google Scholar
Dunson, W.A., 1985. Effect of water salinity and food salt content on growth and sodium efflux of hatchling diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys). Physiological Zoology, 58, 736747.Google Scholar
Gadow, H., 1901. Amphibia and reptiles. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilles-Baillien, M., 1970. Urea and osmoregulation in the diamondback terrapin Malaclemys centrata centrata (Latreille). Journal of Experimental Biology, 52, 691697.Google Scholar
Hartnoll, R.G., 1971. The occurrence, methods and significance of swimming in the Brachyura. Animal Behaviour, 19, 3450.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, S.F. & Hatsel, C., 1926. Diamondback terrapin culture at Beaufort, N.C. Economic Circular. Bureau of Fisheries, Washington, no. 60.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, S.F., 1932. Growth of diamondback terrapins. Size attained, sex ratio and longevity. Zoologica, 9, 551563.Google Scholar
Hurd, L.E., Smedes, G.W. & Dean, T.A., 1979. An ecological study of a natural population of diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys t. terrapin) in a Delaware salt marsh. Estuaries, 2, 2833.Google Scholar
Pritchard, P.C.H., 1979. Encyclopaedia of turtles. Hong Kong: TFH Publications.Google Scholar
Robinson, G.D. & Dunson, W.A., 1976. Water and sodium balance in the estuarine diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys). Journal of Comparative Physiology, 105(B), 129152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, D.W. & Krebs, J.R., 1986. Foraging theory. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vlas, J. de, 1979a. Annual food intake by plaice and flounder in a tidal flat area in the Dutch Wadden Sea, with special reference to consumption of regenerating parts of macrobenthic prey. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 13, 117153.Google Scholar
Vlas, J. de, 1979b. Secondary production by tail regeneration in a tidal flat population of lugworms (Arenicola marina), cropped by flatfish. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 13, 362393.Google Scholar
Vlas, J. de, 1981. On cropping and being cropped: the regeneration of body parts by benthic organisms. In Feeding and survival strategies of estuarine organisms (ed. N.V., Jones and W.J., Wolff), pp. 173177. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar