Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:30:52.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biometry of the Copepod Calanus Finmarchicus (Gunn.) in Stages V and VI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

H. Barnes
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport
Margaret Barnes
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport

Extract

One hundred each of stage VI male and female and stage V Calanus finmarchicus were picked at random, and, by means of a projection microscope, measurements made on a number of segments in both metasome and urosome.

The stage VI female population was mixed containing 95% of a smallsized population and 5% of a larger size-group. The males constituted a single population.

At this time of the season the stage VI male and female metasomes are the same length, but there are differences in the sizes of the individual segments, the most striking of which is that of the head

The stage V animals in many of the measurements could be quite clearly separated into two size-groups of about 50% each and it is suggested that these are potential male and female populations. This separation at 50/50 has been noticed in numerous other collections of stage V, but it shouldbe emphasized that the differences are population differences in regard to those measurements considered.

Evidence is presented which shows that the state of the antennules after preservation in 5% neutral formalin is unlikely in stage V animals to be a reliable guide to their sex in the next stage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bogorov, G., 1933. Modifications in the biomass of Calanus finmarchicus in accordance with its age. Bull. State Oceanogr. Inst. U.S.S.R., No. 8 (English summary).Google Scholar
Gardiner, A. C., 1933. Vertical distribution in Calanus finmarchicus. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 18, pp. 575610.Google Scholar
Gurney, R., 1931. British Freshwater Copepoda, Vol. 1. Ray Soc., London.Google Scholar
Marshall, S. M., 1933. On the biology of Calanus finmarchicus. II. Seasonal variations in the size of Calanus finmarchicus in the Clyde Sea-Area. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 19, pp. 111–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, C. B., 1949. Continuous plankton records: the distribution of Calanus finmarchicus (Gunn.) and its two forms in the North Sea, 1938–39. Hull Bull. Mar. Ecol., Vol. 2, pp. 215–75.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1928. The vertical distribution of marine macro-plankton. VII. Observations on the behaviour of Calanus finmarchicus. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 15, pp. 429–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Störmer, L., 1929. Copepods from the Michael Sars Expedition 1924. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer, Rapp. Proc. Verb., Vol. 56, pp. 157.Google Scholar
Ussing, H. H., 1938. The biology of some important plankton animals in the Fjords of East Greenland. Medd. om Gronland, Bd. 100, Nr. 7, 108 pp.Google Scholar