Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T02:40:24.051Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

San Sebastián del Monte Mixtec

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2023

Félix Cortés ,
Iara Mantenuto Open the ORCID record for Iara Mantenuto [Opens in a new window]  and
Jeremy Steffman Open the ORCID record for Jeremy Steffman [Opens in a new window]
Félix Cortés
Affiliation:
Club Proyecto Alma Mixteca ctf214@gmail.com
Iara Mantenuto
Affiliation:
California State University Dominguez Hills imantenuto@csudh.edu
Jeremy Steffman
Affiliation:
Northwestern University jeremysteffman@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

San Sebastián del Monte Mixtec (SSM) (ISO:mks), also known as Tò’on Ndà’vi, is a language of the Mixtecan family, Otomanguean stock (Rensch 1976). The Mixtecan language family consists of Mixtec, Cuicatec and Trique, though Mixtec and Cuicatec are part of the same subgroup, also called Mixtecan (Josserand 1983: 99–101). SSM is part of the Mixteca Baja region of Oaxaca (Josserand 1983: 107). San Sebastián del Monte is a town in the Santo Domingo Tonalá municipality of Oaxaca State, Mexico, in the district of Huajuapan de León, 45 km southwest of Huajuapan de León (see Figure 1), with a population of approximately 2000 people (latitude: 17.677778, longitude: −98.021944).

Type
Illustration of the IPA
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , December 2023 , pp. 1182 - 1203
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Phonetic Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bickel, Balthasar, Comrie, Bernard & Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. The Leipzig Glossing Rules: Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. Retrieved from https://www.eva.mpg.de/lingua/resources/glossing-rules.php, 1 November 2020.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2020. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.1.09). Retrieved from http://www.praat.org, 1 November 2020.Google Scholar
Henry, Bradley, C. & Hollenbach, Barbara E. (eds.). 1988. Studies in the syntax of Mixtecan languages, vol. 1 (Summer Institute of Linguistics Publication No. 83). Dallas, TX: SIL & Arlington, TX: The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Henry, Bradley, C. & Hollenbach, Barbara E. (eds.). 1990. Studies in the syntax of Mixtecan languages, vol. 2 (Summer Institute of Linguistics Publication No. 90). Dallas, TX: SIL & Arlington, TX: The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Henry, Bradley, C. & Hollenbach, Barbara E. (eds.). 1991. Studies in the syntax of Mixtecan languages, vol. 3 (Summer Institute of Linguistics Publication No. 105). Dallas, TX: SIL & Arlington, TX: The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Henry, Bradley, C. & Hollenbach, Barbara E. (eds.). 1992. Studies in the syntax of Mixtecan languages, vol. 4 (Summer Institute of Linguistics Publication No. 111). Dallas, TX: SIL & Arlington, TX: The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Campbell, Eric W. 2016. Tone and inflection in Zenzontepec Chatino. In Palancar & Léonard (eds.), 141–162.Google Scholar
Chen, Marilyn Y. 1997. Acoustic correlates of English and French nasalized vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102(4), 2360–2370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daly, John P. & Hyman, Larry M.. 2007. On the representation of tone in Peñoles Mixtec. International Journal of American Linguistics 73(2), 165–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiCanio, Christian T., Benn, Joshua & Castillo García, Rey. 2018. The phonetics of information structure in Yoloxóchitl Mixtec. Journal of Phonetics 68, 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiCanio, Christian T. & Bennett, Ryan. 2021. Mesoamerica. In Carlos Gussenhhoven & Aoju Chen (eds.), The Oxford handbook of language prosody, 408–427. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DiCanio, Christian T., Zhang, Caicai, Whalen, Douglas H. & Rey Castillo García. 2020. Phonetic structure in Yoloxóchitl Mixtec consonants. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 50(3), 333–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilley, Laura, Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie & Ostendorf, Mari. 1996. Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure. Journal of Phonetics 24(4), 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eischens, Ben. 2021. Laryngearization and word reduction in Mixtec: Phonetics in phonology. Qualifying paper, University of California Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Garellek, Marc. 2013. Production and perception of glottal stops. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Garellek, Marc, Chai, Yuan, Huang, Yaqian & Van Doren, Maxine. Voicing of glottal consonants and non-modal vowels. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100321000116. Published online by Cambridge University Press, 19 July 2021.Google Scholar
Gerfen, Chip. 1999. Phonology and phonetics in Coatzospan Mixtec (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 48). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2620-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerfen, Chip & Baker, Kirk. 2005. The production and perception of laryngealized vowels in Coatzospan Mixtec. Journal of Phonetics 33(3), 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, James M. & Houde, Robert A.. 1996. Role of f0 and amplitude in the perception of intervocalic glottal stops. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 39(6), 1182–1190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollenbach, Barbara E. 2015. Notes on tense, mood, and negation in Mixtec languages. Ms., SIL International.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas. 2022. Norma de escritura del Tu’un Savi (idioma mixteco). Mexico City: Secretaría de Cultura Instituto Nacional de Lenguas Indígenas.Google Scholar
Josserand, Judy K. 1983. Mixtec dialect history. Ph.D. dissertation, Tulane University.Google Scholar
Kahle, David & Wickham, Hadley. 2013. ggmap: Spatial Visualization with ggplot2 . The R Journal 5(1), 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia A., Wymark, Daniel & Sharif, Ryan. 2019. Proposal for superscript diacritics for prenasalization, preglottalization and preaspiration. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 51(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
León Vázquez, Octavio. 2017. Sandhi tonal en el mixteco de Yucuquimi de Ocampo, Oaxaca. Masters thesis, Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
Longacre, Robert E. 1957. Proto-Mixtecan (Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics 5). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Monica. 1996. A grammar of Chalcatongo Mixtec. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Monica & Salmons, Joseph. 1995. The phonology of glottalization in Mixtec. International Journal of American Linguistics 61, 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantenuto, Iara. 2020. ‘Other’ and ‘more’ in San Sebastián del Monte Mixtec and beyond. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Marlett, Stephen A. 1992. Nasalization in Mixtec languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 58(4), 425–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, Inî G. 2020. Syntactic sketch of San Martín Peras Tu’un Savi. Bachelor of Arts Honors Thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Murty, Sri Rama & Yegnanarayana, Bayya. 2008. Epoch extraction from speech signals. In IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 16, 1602–1613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. 2016. A typology of tone and inflection: A view from the Oto-Manguean languages of Mexico. In Palancar & Léonard (eds.), 109–140.Google Scholar
Palancar, Enrique L. & Léo Léonard, Jean (eds.). 2016. Tone and inflection: New facts and new perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paster, Mary & Beam de Azcona, Rosemary. 2004. A phonological sketch of the Yucunany dialect of Mixtepec Mixtec. In Carmen Jany (ed.), Proceedings of the 7th Annual Workshop on American Indian Languages, 61–76.Google Scholar
Penner, Kevin. 2019. Prosodic structure in Ixtayutla Mixtec: Evidence for the foot. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Peters, Simon L. 2018. The inventory and distribution of tone in Tù’un Ndá’vi, the Mixtec of Piedra Azul (San Martín Peras), Oaxaca. Masters thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Talkin, David. 1992. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. In Gerard Docherty & D. Robert Ladd (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody, 90–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1944. Analysis of a Mixteco text. International Journal of American Linguistics 10(4), 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1948. Tone languages: A technique for determining the number and type of Pitch contrasts in a language, with studies in tonemic substitution and fusion. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
R Core Team 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/, 1 November 2020.Google Scholar
Rensch, Calvin R. 1976. Comparative Otomanguean phonology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Seid, Huessien, Yegnanarayana, Bayya & Rajendran, S.. 2012. Spotting glottal stop in Amharic in continuous speech. Computer Speech & Language 26(4), 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, Yen-Liang, Keating, Patricia A., Vicenik, Chad, & Yu, Kristine. 2011. VoiceSauce: A program for voice analysis. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), Hong Kong, 1846–1849.Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi. 2013. ProsodyPro: A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cortés et al. supplementary material

Cortés et al. supplementary material

Download Cortés et al. supplementary material(File)
File 39 MB