Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T02:22:19.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phonation types: a re-appraisal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

R. K. Sprigg
Affiliation:
(School of Oriental and African Studies, London)

Extract

The Eighth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Leeds, 1975) provided an opportunity, at a discussion seminar called specially for that purpose, ‘The larynx and language’, for phoneticians anxious to put phonation distinctions on a more systematic footing to appeal to specialists in the aerodynamic aspects of laryngal activity and in the physiology of the larynx to help them with criteria to define the phonation distinctions so far observed in languages. In introducing the topic at the discussion seminar E. J. A. Henderson confined her examples to Cambodian, to illustrate the ‘sepulchral’ phonation appropriate to what she terms the lower register (Henderson 1952: 157); but a number of languages are listed in Catford 1964 as making lexically distinctive use of phonation types, Danish, Hindi, Nilotic, Javanese, and Gujerati (p. 36); and Ladefoged 1971 lists some of these and a considerable number of others, including Sindhi, Zulu, Hausa, Wolof, and French (pp. 12–19). In part this article is a continuation of that attempt to attract the attention of instrumental phoneticians to problems posed by phonation differences in languages such as these; but to a large extent it results from a re-examination of various published accounts of phonation distinctions that I undertook in the course of teaching general phonetics. The most comprehensive of these accounts, and the one that I shall chiefly refer to, is Catford 1964, and the tape-recording in which he illustrates a number of the phonation types that he distinguishes in that article; but I have also drawn on Sweet 1877 (3rd edition, 1906), guided by Henderson 1971, Pike 1943, Heffner 1950, Abercrombie 1967, and Ladefoged 1971.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bhaskararao, P. (1972). Practical phonetics. Poona: Deccan College.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1939). ‘The classification of stop consonants’, Le Maître Phonétique, 65, 25.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1964). ‘Phonation types: the classification of some laryngeal components of speech production’, in Abercrombie, D., et al. (Eds.). In honour of Daniel Jones, 2637. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. [Tape recording.] ‘Phonation tpes’.Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1964). ‘Classifying speech sounds by their source’, in D., Abercrombie, et al. (Eds.). In honour of Daniel Jones, 4652. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Gill, H. S., and Gleason, H. A. (1963). A reference grammar of Panjabi. The Hartford Seminary Foundation, Hartford, Conn.Google Scholar
Heffner, R.-M. S. (1950). General phonetics. Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. J. A. (1952). ‘The main features of Cambodian pronunciation’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, XIV, 1, 149–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, E. J. A. (1971). The indispensable foundation. London: O. U. P.Google Scholar
Joshi, S. S. (1973). ‘Pitch and related phenomena in Panjabi’, Pàkha Sanjam, VI, 162.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1971). Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1964). Acoustical characteristics of selected English consonants. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. D. (1973). Phonetics. Penguin.Google Scholar
Pike, E. V. (1963). Dictation exercises in phonetics. Glendale: S.I.L.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1943). Phonetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, E. G. (1970). ‘Late Middle Chinese’, Asia Major, XV, 2, 197239.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1877). A handbook of phonetics. O.U.P.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1906). A handbook of phonetics, 3rd ed.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1908). The sounds of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1911). ‘Phonetics’, in Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed.Google Scholar
Zemlin, W. R. (1964). Speech and hearing science. Stipes Publishing Co., Champaign, III.Google Scholar