Skip to main content Accessibility help

Clicking behavior as a possible speaker discriminant in English

  • Erica Gold (a1), Peter French (a2) and Philip Harrison (a3)


This study examines the potential of frequency of clicking (the production of velaric ingressive stops) as a possible basis for discriminating among speakers of English by forensic phoneticians. From analyses of clicking behavior among 100 young male speakers of Standard Southern British English (SSBE) recorded in two interactional tasks, it concludes that, contrary to the view of some forensic practitioners, the majority of speakers – of this language variety at least – do not vary sufficiently from one another in their rates of clicking for this feature to serve as a reliable discriminator. Further, speakers are generally not stable in their clicking behavior, either within or across interactions, and their rates of clicking may vary through accommodation to the click rates of their interlocutors. In view of these findings, it is suggested that the mere comparison of clicking rates across questioned and known recordings is unlikely to be of assistance to forensic phoneticians in the majority of forensic speaker comparison cases.



Hide All
Abercrombie, David. 1967. Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ball, Martin J. 1989. Phonetics for speech pathology. London: Whurr.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, Daniel. 2012. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.35). (accessed 12 October 2012).
Crystal, David. 1987. The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foulkes, Paul & French, Peter. 2012. Forensic phonetic speaker comparison. In Solan, Lawrence & Tiersma, Peter (eds.), Oxford handbook of language and law, 557572. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
French, Peter. 1994. An overview of forensic phonetics with particular reference to speaker identification. Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 1 (2), 197206.
French, Peter, Nolan, Francis, Foulkes, Paul, Harrison, Philip & McDougall, Kirsty. 2010. The UK position statement on forensic speaker comparison: A rejoinder to Rose and Morrison. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 17 (1), 143152.
French, Peter & Stevens, Louisa. 2013. Forensic speech science. In Jones, Mark & Knight, Rachael-Anne (eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to phonetics, 183197. London: Continuum.
Giles, Howard. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15 (2), 87105.
Giles, Howard & Ogay, Tania. 2007. Communication accommodation theory. In Whaley, Bryan B. & Samter, Wendy (eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars, 293310. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gimson, A. C. 1970. An introduction to the pronunciation of English, 2nd edn.London: Edward Arnold.
Gold, Erica & French, Peter. 2011. International practices in phonetic speaker comparison. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 18 (2), 293307.
Künzel, Hermann. 1995. Field procedures in forensic speaker recognition. In Lewis, Jack Windsor (ed.), Studies in general and English phonetics: Essays in honour of Professor J. D. O'Connor, 6884. London: Routledge.
Morrison, Geoffrey. 2009. Forensic voice comparison and the paradigm shift. Science and Justice 49, 298308.
Nolan, Francis, McDougall, Kirsty, de Jong, Gea & Hudson, Toby. 2009. The DyViS database: Style-controlled recordings of 100 homogeneous speakers for forensic phonetic research. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 16 (1), 3157.
Ogden, Richard. 2013. Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43 (3), 299320.
Rose, Phil. 2002. Forensic speaker identification. London: Taylor & Francis.
Shepard, Carolyn A., Giles, Howard & LePoire, Beth. 2001. Communication accommodation theory. In Robinson, W. Peter & Giles, Howard (eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology, 3451. Chichester: Wiley.
Trudgill, Peter. 1981. Linguistic accommodation: Sociolinguistic observations on a sociopsychological theory. In Hendrick, Roberta, Mase, Carrie & Miller, Mary Frances (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 218237. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Wright, Melissa. 2007. Clicks as markers of new sequences in English conversation. 16th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVI), Saarbrücken, 1069–1072.
Wright, Melissa. 2011a. On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41 (2), 207229.
Wright, Melissa. 2011b. The phonetics–interaction interface in the initiation of closings in everyday English telephone calls. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (4), 10801099.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Clicking behavior as a possible speaker discriminant in English

  • Erica Gold (a1), Peter French (a2) and Philip Harrison (a3)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.