Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T19:35:38.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An acoustic analysis of Oromo vowels of the northern dialect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2023

Feda Negesse Open the ORCID record for Feda Negesse [Opens in a new window]
Feda Negesse*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Addis Ababa University feda.negesse@aau.edu.et
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study presents the results of an acoustic analysis of Oromo vowels of the northern dialect. The data for the study were collected from 19 speakers (nine female, 10 male) who produced the vowels in the same phonetic environment. Such acoustic measures as duration, fundamental frequency and the first three formant frequencies were extracted for the analysis. In a linear mixed-effects model, each acoustic parameter was modelled as a function of the fixed effects such as gender and vowel quality, and of participants’ random effects. The model shows a main effect of gender on all the acoustic measures, with the female speakers producing the vowels with significantly greater duration and formant frequencies. The model also indicates the main effect of vowel quality on all the acoustic measures with the exception of duration. The proportion of variances explained by gender and vowel quality is found to be large for fundamental frequency and the first formant frequency respectively. As regards the classification of the vowels, Support Vector Machine reveals that the time-varying frequency does not have an advantage over a steady state in separating vowels of both genders. However, it is generally fairly effective in classifying vowels of the dialect of the language.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , December 2023 , pp. 1033 - 1048
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Phonetic Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, R. Robert. 1995. Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Adank, Patti. 2003. Vowel normalisation: A perceptual-acoustic study of Dutch vowels. Wageningen: Ponsen & Loosen.Google Scholar
Adank, Patti, Smits, Roel & van Hout, Roeland. 2004. A comparison of vowel normalisation procedures for language variation research. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(5), 3099–3107.10.1121/1.1795335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adank, Patti, van Hout, Roeland & Smits, Roel. 2004. An acoustic description of vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(3), 1729–1738.10.1121/1.1779271CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, Jonathan. 2012. Migration and mobility in a rapidly changing small town in northeastern Ethiopia: Environment & urbanisation. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) 24(1), 345–367.Google Scholar
Bartoń, Kamil. 2017. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.40.0. https://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 . Journal Statistical Software 67(1), 1–48.10.18637/jss.v067.i01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yimam, Baye. 2016. Phonological features of the Amharic variety of South Wollo. In Binyam Sisay Mendisu & Janne Bondi Johannessen (eds.), Multilingual Ethiopia: Linguistic challenges and capacity building efforts: Special issue of Oslo Studies in Language 8(1), 9–30.Google Scholar
Behne, Dawn, Moxness, Bente & Nyland, Anne.1996. Acoustic-phonetic evidence of vowel quantity and quality in Norwegian: Quarterly Progress and Status Report. http://www.speech.kth.se/qpsr.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2001. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.20).Google Scholar
Bradlow, Ann R. 1995. A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 1916–1924.10.1121/1.412064CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Violet A. 2021. An introduction to linear mixed-effects modelling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 4(1),1–19.10.1177/2515245920960351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartei, Valentina, Cowles, Wind, Banerjee, Robin & Reby, David. 2014. Control of voice gender in pre-pubertal children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 32, 100–106.10.1111/bjdp.12027CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, Hyunju, Eun Jong Kong, Jan Edwards, Weismer, Gary, Fourakis, Marios & Hwang, Youngdeok. 2012. Cross-linguistic studies of children’s and adults’ vowel spaces. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131(1), 442–454.10.1121/1.3651823CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, Cynthia G., Pisoni, David B. & de Jong, Kenneth. 2005. Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118(3), 1661–1676.10.1121/1.2000774CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CSA [Central Statistical Agency]. 2007. Statistical report and housing census. Addis Ababa: Central Statistical Agency.Google Scholar
Ado, Derib. 2011. An acoustic analysis of Amharic vowels, plosives and ejectives. Ph.D. thesis, Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar
DiBenedetto, Maria-Gebriella. 1989. Frequency and time variations of the first formant: Properties relevant to the perceptions of vowel height. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86, 67–77.10.1121/1.398221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvin, Jaydene, Williams, Daneil & Escudero, Paola. 2016. Dynamic acoustic properties of monophthongs and diphthongs in Western Sydney Australian English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140, 576–581.10.1121/1.4952387CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, Hargus S. & Kewley-Port, Diane. 2007. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 50, 1241–1255.10.1044/1092-4388(2007/087)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, Robert Allen & Jacewicz, Ewa. 2009. Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics in American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126, 2603–2618.10.1121/1.3212921CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillenbrand, James, Clark, Michael & Nearey, Terrance. 2001. Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109, 748–763.10.1121/1.1337959CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillenbrand, James, Getty, Laura A., Clark, Michael J. & Wheeler, Kimberlee. 1995. Acoustic analysis of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 3099–3111.10.1121/1.411872CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, Xavier A., Lynda Donaldson, Maria Eugenia Correa-Cano, Julian Evans, David N. Fisher, Cecily E. D. Goodwin, Beth S. Robinson, David J. Hodgson & Inger, Richard. 2018. A brief introduction to mixed effects modelling and multi-model inference in ecology. PeerJ 6:e4794, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, J. James, Strange, Winifred & Miranda, Salvatore. 1994. Vowel identification in mixed-speaker, silent-centre syllables. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95, 1030–1043.10.1121/1.410014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jongman, Allard, Fourakis, Marios & Sereno, Joan A.. 1989. The acoustic vowel space of Modern Greek and German. Language and Speech 32(3), 221–248.10.1177/002383098903200303CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kebede, Hordofa. 2009. Towards genetic classification of Oromo dialects. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Kirtley, M. Joelle, Grama, James, Drager, Katie & Simpson, Sean. 2016. An acoustic analysis of the vowels of Hawai’i English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 46(1), 79–89.10.1017/S0025100315000456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, Ying-Yee, Mullangi, Ala & Kokkinakis, Kostas. 2014. Classification of fricative consonants for speech enhancement in hearing devices. PLoS ONE 9(4).10.1371/journal.pone.0095001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kpodo, Pascal. 2013. An acoustic analysis of Siwu Vowels. Nordic Journal of African Studies 22(3), 177–195.Google Scholar
Lamberti, Marcello. 1991. Cushitic and its classifications. Anthropos 86, 552–561.Google Scholar
Lawson, Eleanor, Stuart-Smith, Jane & Rodger, Lydia. 2019. A comparison of acoustic and articulatory parameters for the GOOSE vowel across British Isles Englishes. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 146(6), 4363–4381.10.1121/1.5139215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, Sungbok, Potamianos, Alexandros & Narayanan, Shrikanth. 1999. The acoustics of children’s speech: Developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105(3), 1455–1468.10.1121/1.426686CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lennes, Mietta. 2003. Vowel analyser. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jmriebold/Praat-Tools/master/Vowel-Analyzer.praat.Google Scholar
Lenth, Russell V., Buerkner, Paul, Giné-Vázquez, Iago, Maxime Herve, Maarten Jung, Jonathon Love, Fernando Miguez, Riebl, Hannes & Singmann, Henrik. 2022. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package1/4emmeans.Google Scholar
Leung, K. W Keith, Jongman, Allard, Wang, Yue & Sereno, Joan A.. 2016. Acoustic characteristics of clearly spoken English tense and lax vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140(1), 45–58.10.1121/1.4954737CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloret-Romanyach, Maria-Rosa. 1988. Gemination and vowel length in Oromo morphophonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Matuschek, Hannes, Reinhold Kliegl, Shravan Vasishth, Baayen, Harald & Bates, Douglas. 2017. Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 94, 305–315.10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Geoffrey S. & Nearey, Terrance M.. 2007. Testing theories of vowel inherent spectral change. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122, 15–22.10.1121/1.2739111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nearey, Terrance M. 2013. Vowel inherent spectral change in vowels in North American English. In Stewart Morrison, Geoffrey & Assmann, Peter F. (eds.), Vowel inherent spectral change, 49–85. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-14209-3_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, David L. & Delen, Dursun. 2008. Advanced data mining techniques. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Owens, Jonathan. 1985. A grammar of Harar Oromo. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Pépiot, Erwan. 2012. Voice, speech and gender: Male–female acoustic differences and cross-language variation in English and French speakers. Presented at XVèmes Rencontres Jeunes Chercheurs de l’ED 268, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E. & Barney, Harold L.. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24, 175–184.10.1121/1.1906875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisanski, Katarzyna, Fraccaro, Paul J., Tigue, Cara C., O’Connor, Jillian J. M., Susanne Röder, Paul W. Andrews, Bernhard Fink, DeBruine, Lisa M., Jones, Benedict C. & Feinberg, David R.. 2014. Vocal indicators of body size in men and women: A meta-analysis. Animal Behaviour 95(4), 89–99.10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.06.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roettger, Timo & Gordon, Matthew. 2017. Methodological issues in the study of word stress correlate. Linguistics Vanguard 3(1), 20170006.10.1515/lingvan-2017-0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoormann, Heike E., Heeringa, Wilbert & Peters, Jörg. 2019. Standard German vowel production by monolingual and trilingual speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism 23(1), 138–156.10.1177/1367006917711593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Adrian P. 2001. Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109, 2153–2164.10.1121/1.1356020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singmann, Henrik, Ben Bolker, Jake Westfall, Frederik Aust, Søren Højsgaard,John Fox, Michael A. Lawrence, Ulf Mertens, Love, Jonathon, Lenth, Russell & Haubo Bojesen Christensen, Rune. 2016. afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. R package version 0.16–1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/afex/index.html.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep & Ohala, John J.. 2010. What is and what is not under the control of the speaker: Intrinsic vowel duration. In Cécile Fougeron, Barbara Kühnert, D’Imperio, Mariapaola & Vallée, Nathalie (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 10, 607–655. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110224917.5.607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, Winifred, Andrea Weber, Erika S. Levy, Valeriy Shafiro, Hisagi, Miwako & Nishi, Kanae. 2007. Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: Phonetic context effects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122, 111–129.10.1121/1.2749716CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stroomer, Harry. 1987. A comparative study of three southern Oromo dialects in Kenya: Phonology, morphology and vocabulary. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Tosco, Mauro. 2000. Is there an “Ethiopian language area”? Anthropological Linguistics 42(3), 329–365.Google Scholar
Amansa, Tujube. 2018. An acoustic analysis of Oromo vowels. Ph.D. thesis, Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar
Voigt, Rainier M. 1985. Tone types of nouns in Borana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 7, 59–62.10.1515/jall.1985.7.1.59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wako, Tola. 1981. The phonology of Mecha Oromo. MA thesis, Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar
Wickham, Hadley. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Daniel & Escudero, Paola & Gafos, Adamantios. 2018. Spectral change and duration as cues in Australian English listeners’ front vowel categorization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 44(3), 215–225.10.1121/1.5055019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Bodo. 2020. Statistics for linguists: An introduction to using R. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Ximenes, Arwen B., Shaw, Jason A. & Carignan, Christopher. 2017. A comparison of acoustic and articulatory methods for analysing vowel differences across dialects: Data from American and Australian English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142(1), 363–377.10.1121/1.4991346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Byunggon. 1996. A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics 24, 245–260.10.1006/jpho.1996.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar