Article contents
Some results concerning quasiperfect numbers
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 April 2009
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
New methods are introduced here to show that if n is a quasiperfect number and ω(n) the number of its distinct prime factors, then ω(n) ≥ 7 and n > 1035, and if further 3 ∤ n then ω(n) ≥ 9 and n > 1040.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1982
References
Abbott, H. L., Aull, C. E., Brown, Ezra and Suryanarayana, D. (1973), ‘Quasiperfect numbers’, Acta Arith. 22, 439–447:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976), ‘Corrections to the paper “Quasiperfect numbers”‘, Acta Arith. 29, 427–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattaneo, Paolo (1951), ‘Sui numeri quasiperfetti’, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital. (3) 6, 59–62.Google Scholar
Dickson, L. (1913), ‘Finiteness of the odd perfect and primitive abundant numbers with n distinct prime factors’, Amer. J. Math. 35, 413–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerrard, R. P. and Temperley, Nicholas (1973), ‘Almost perfect numbers’, Math. Mag. 46, 84–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishore, Masao (1978), ‘Odd integers N with five distinct prime factors for which 2 - 10-12 < σ (N)/N < 2 + 10-12’, Math. Comp. 32, 303–309.Google Scholar
Pomerance, C. (1974). ‘Odd perfect numbers are divisible by at least seven distinct primes’, Acta Arith. 25, 265–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerance, C. (1975), ‘The second largest prime factor of an odd perfect number’, Math. Comp. 29, 914–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
- 13
- Cited by