Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T11:24:51.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A generalization of convex functions via support properties*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Aharon Ben-Tal  and
Adi Ben-Israel
Aharon Ben-Tal
Affiliation:
Center for Cybernetic Studies, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.
Adi Ben-Israel
Affiliation:
Center for Cybernetic Studies, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With respect to a given family of functions F, a function is said to be F-convex, if it is supported, at each point, by some member of F. For particular choices of F one obtains the convex functions and the generalized convex functions in the sense of Beckenbach. F-convex functions are characterized and studied, retaining some essential results of classical convexity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 1976 , pp. 341 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1976

References

Beckenbach, E. F., (1937), ‘Generalized convex functions’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 43, 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckenbach, E. F. and Bellman, R., (1965), Inequalities, (Springer-Verlag New York Inc., 2nd revised printing, 1965).Google Scholar
Beckenbach, E. F. and Jackson, L. K., (1953), ‘Subfunctions of several variables’, Pacific J. Math., 3, 291–313.Google Scholar
Danzer, L., Grunbaum, B. and Klee, V. L., (1963), ‘Helly's Theorem and Its Relatives’, in Convexity, Klee, V. L. (ed.), Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. VII, American Mathematical Society, 101–180.Google Scholar
Fiedler, M. and Pták, V., (1962), ‘On matrices with non-positive off-diagonal elements and positive principal minors’, Czech. Math. J., 12, 382–400.Google Scholar
Fiedler, M. and Pták, V., (1966), ‘Some generalizations of positive definiteness and monotonicity’, Numer. Math., 9, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gantmacher, F. R., (1959), The Theory of Matrices, Vol. I, (Chelsea Publishing Co., New York, 1959).Google Scholar
Jackson, L. K., (1968), ‘Subfunctions and second-order ordinary differential inequalities’, Advances in Mathematics, 2, 307–363.Google Scholar
Leighton, W., (1966), ‘On Liapunov functions with a single critical point’, Pacific J. Math., 19, 467–472.Google Scholar
Moré, J. and Rheinboldt, W., (1973), ‘On P- and S-functions and related classes of n-dimensional nonlinear mappings’, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 6, 45–68.Google Scholar
Motzkin, T. S., (1949), ‘Approximation by curves of a unisolvent family’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 55, 789–793.Google Scholar
Ortega, J. M. and Rheinboldt, W. C., (1970), ‘Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables’, (Academic Press, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Peixoto, M. M., (1948), ‘On the existence of a derivative of generalized convex functions’, Summa Brasiliensis Math., 2, No. 3.Google Scholar
Peixoto, M. M., (1949), ‘generalized convex functions and second oredr differential inequalities’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 55, 563–572.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. W. and Varberg, D. W., (1973), Convex Functions, (Academic Press, New York, 1973).Google Scholar
Rockafellar, R. T., (1970), Convex Analysis, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J., 1970).Google Scholar
Szegö, G. P., (1968), ‘A theorem of Rolle's type in En for functions of the class C 1’, Pacific J. Math., 27, 193–195.Google Scholar