Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T17:03:21.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Continuous trace C*-algebras with given Dixmer-Douady class

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Iain Raeburn
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics University of New South WalesPost Office Box 1 Kensington, NSW, 2033, Australia
Joseph L. Taylor
Affiliation:
(usual address of J. L. Taylor: Department of Mathematics, University of UtahSalt Lake City Utah 84112, U.S.A.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We give an explicit construction of a continuous trace C*algebra with prescribed Dixmier-Douady class, and with only finite-dimensional irreducible representations. These algebras often have non-trivial automorphisms, and we show how a recent description of the outer automorphism group of a stable continuous trace C*algebra follows easily from our main result. Since our motivation came from work on a new notion of central separable algebras, we explore the connections between this purely algebraic subject and C*a1gebras.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1985

References

[1]Brown, L. G., ‘Stable isomorphism of hereditary subalgebras of C*-a1gebras, Pacific J. Math. 71 (1977), 335348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Dixmier, J., ‘Champs continus d'espaces hilbertiens et de C*-algebres’, II, J. Math. Pures Appl. 42 (1963), 120.Google Scholar
[3]Dixmier, J., C*-algebras, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977.Google Scholar
[4]Dixmier, J. and Douady, A., 'Champs continus d'espaces hilbertiens et de C*-algèbres, Bull. Soc. Math. France 91 (1963), 227284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Grothendieck, A., ‘Le groupe de Brauer, I: algèbres d'Azumaya et interprétations diverses’, Séminaire Bourbaki 1964/1965, exposé 290.Google Scholar
[6]Kumjian, A., ‘Preliminary C*-algebras arising from local homeomorphisms’, Math. Scand. 52 (1983), 269278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Pedersen, G. K., C*-algebras and their automorphism groups, Academic Press, London, 1979.Google Scholar
[8]Phillips, J. and Raeburn, I., ‘Automorphisms of C*-algebras and second Cech cohomology’, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 29 (1980), 799822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Phillips, J. and Raeburn, I., ‘Perturbations of C*-algebras, II’, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 43 (1981), 4672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Phillips, J. and Raeburn, I., ‘Crossed products by locally unitary automorphism groups and principal bundles’, J. Operator Theory 11 (1984), 215241.Google Scholar
[11]Raeburn, I. and Taylor, J. L., ‘The bigger Brauer group and étale cohomology’, Pacific J. Math., to appear.Google Scholar
[12]Renault, J., A groupoid approach to C*-algebras, (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 793), Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Russell, M. J., ‘Automorphisms and derivations of continuous trace C*-algebras’, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 22 (1980), 139145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Taylor, J. L., ‘A bigger Brauer group’, Pacific J. Math. 103 (1982), 163203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar