Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T02:24:43.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Splittings and the finite model property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Marcus Kracht
Marcus Kracht*
Affiliation:
II. Department of Mathematics, 1000 Berlin 33, Germany, E-mail: kracht@math.fu-berlin.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An old conjecture of modal logics states that every splitting of the major systems K4, S4, G and Grz has the finite model property. In this paper we will prove that all iterated splittings of G have fmp, whereas in the other cases we will give explicit counterexamples. We also introduce a proof technique which will give a positive answer for large classes of splitting frames. The proof works by establishing a rather strong property of these splitting frames namely that they preserve the finite model property in the following sense. Whenever an extension Λ has fmp so does the splitting Λ/f of Λ by f. Although we will also see that this method has its limitations because there are frames lacking this property, it has several desirable side effects. For example, properties such as compactness, decidability and others can be shown to be preserved in a similar way and effective bounds for the size of models can be given. Moreover, all methods and proofs are constructive.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 139 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[78]Blok, W., On the degree of incompleteness in modal logics and the covering relation in the lattice of modal logics, Report 78–07, Department of Mathematics, University of Amsterdam, 1978.Google Scholar
[84]Bull, R. A. and Segerberg, K., Basic modal logic, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 1–88.Google Scholar
[74a]Fine, K., Logics containing K4, Part I, this Journal, vol. 39(1974), pp. 229–237.Google Scholar
[74b]Fine, K., An ascending chain of S4 logics, Theoria, vol. 40(1974), pp. 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[74c]Fine, K., An incomplete logic containing S4, Theoria, vol. 40(1974), pp. 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[85]Fine, K., Logics containing K4, Part II, this Journal, vol. 50(1985), pp. 619–651.Google Scholar
[84]Gabbay, D. M. and Guenthner, F., Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[90]Kracht, M., An almost general splitting theorem for modal logic, Studio Logica, vol. 49(1990), pp. 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[91]Kracht, K., Internal definability and completeness in modal logic, Dissertation, FU Berlin, 1991.Google Scholar
[93]Kracht, M., Prefinitely axiomatizable modal and intermediate logics, Zeitschrift für mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung, vol. 39 (1993).Google Scholar
[91]Kracht, M. and Wolter, F., Properties of independently axiomatizable bimodal logics, this Journal, vol. 56(1991), pp. 1469–1485.Google Scholar
[75]Maximova, L. L., Finite-level modal logics, Algebra i Logika, vol. 14(1975), pp. 304–319.Google Scholar
[72]Mckenzie, R., Equational bases and nonmodular lattice varieties, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 174(1972), pp. 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[77]Rautenberg, W., Der Verband der normalen verzweigten Modallogiken, Mathematische Zeitschrift, vol. 156(1977), pp. 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[79]Rautenberg, W., Klassische und nichtklassische Aussagenlogik, Wiesbaden, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[80]Rautenberg, W., Splitting lattices of logics, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 20(1980), pp. 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[83]Rautenberg, W., Modal tableau calculi and interpolation, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 12(1983), pp. 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[68]Yankov, V. A., Constructing a sequence of strongly independent intuitionistic propositional calculi, Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 181(1968), No. 1, pp. 806–807.Google Scholar