Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-qvshk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T20:51:13.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Yunnan–Burma railway, 1860s–1940s: Imagining, planning and rejecting a railway that was never built

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2023

Abstract

In the late nineteenth century, British commercial interests in Asia and back home visualised a railway connecting British Burma with inland China, which they saw as a vast unexplored market. British engineers and adventurers were then employed by the commercial bodies to investigate the economy and geography of Yunnan and Upper Burma for the project. The railway was eventually rejected by the British as being unviable and unprofitable. The colonial knowledge created by these missions (in the form of travelogues, survey reports, interviews and studies) was later interpreted by Chinese nationalists as evidence of Britain's ambitions to colonise southwest China in 1905 (the Russo-Japanese War) and 1927 (the Northern Expedition) when the Chinese nation was in deep crisis. But the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War led the Chinese Nationalist government to reconsider the Yunnan–Burma railway as necessary infrastructure for obtaining foreign supplies to save the nation. The colonial knowledge produced by British explorers and merchants earlier was reinterpreted by the Nationalists to try to persuade the British authorities to construct the Burma section of the railway. By tracing the history of this failed project, this article argues that nationalist understandings of colonial infrastructure were far from fixed and consistent. It recounts the circulation of colonial knowledge on the Yunnan–Burma railway from the late nineteenth to the early twentieth century, showing how different nationalist agents in Asia interpreted and reinterpreted colonial infrastructure at various critical periods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore, 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers who gave very insightful remarks and comments.

References

1 Cooper, Frederick, Colonialism in question: Theory, knowledge, history (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stoler, Ann Laura, Along the archival grain: Epistemic anxieties and colonial common sense (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2009)Google Scholar; Bickers, Robert, Britain in China: Community, culture and colonialism 1900–1949 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Bickers, Robert, ‘Shanghailanders: The formation and identity of the British settler community in Shanghai 1843–1937’, Past & Present 159, 1 (1998): 161211CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bickers, Robert, Empire made me: An Englishman adrift in Shanghai (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

2 British businessmen had been highly influential in the expansion of the empire since the 18th century. See Hanser, Jessica, ‘From cross-cultural credit to colonial debt: British expansion in Madras and Canton, 1750–1800’, American Historical Review 1, 1 (2019): 87107CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Amin, Shahid, Event, metaphor, memory: Chauri Chaura 1922–1992 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Sarkar, Sumit, Beyond nationalist frames: Postmodernism, fundamentalism, history (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002)Google Scholar; Edwards, Penny, Cambodge: The cultivation of a nation (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Strate, Shane, The lost territories: Thailand's history of national humiliation (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Rousseau, Jean-Francois, ‘An imperial railway failure: The Indochina–Yunnan Railway, 1898–1941’, Journal of Transport History 35, 1 (2014): 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Rousseau argues that the Yunnan–Haiphong railway never became profitable for the French.

5 David Wilson Del Testa, ‘Paint the trains red: Labor, nationalism, and the railroads in the French colonial Indochina, 1898–1945’ (PhD diss., University of California, Davis, 2001); Selda Altan Öztürk, ‘Labor and the politics of life along the Yunnan–Indochina Railway, 1898–1911’ (PhD diss., New York University, 2017).

6 Croizier, Ralph, ‘Antecedents of the Burma Road: British plans for a Burma–China railway in the nineteenth century’, Journal of Southeast Asian History 3, 2 (1962): 118CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Sprye, Richard, The British and China railway (London: n.p., 1858), pp. 113Google Scholar.

8 Ibid., p. 23.

9 ‘India and China’, The Times, 17 Aug. 1863.

10 ‘Money-market & City intelligence’, The Times, 2 May 1866.

11 ‘To the Editor of The Times’, The Times, 12 Oct. 1860.

12 Croizier, ‘Antecedents of the Burma Road’, p. 4.

13 Sessional Papers, 19th century, Great Britain, Parliament, House of Commons (henceforth SP), 1864, vol. 63 (Shannon: Irish University Press), pp. 393–415; SP, 1867–68, vol. 51, pp. 687–744.

14 SP, 1864, vol. 63, p. 400.

15 SP, 1867–68, vol. 51, p. 764.

16 ‘Tuesday Morning, January 9’, Glasgow Herald, 9 Jan. 1883.

17 ‘The Colquhoun Exploration Scheme’, Edinburgh News, 15 Jan. 1883; ‘Explorations in Western Asia’, Portsmouth Evening News, 10 Jan. 1883; ‘The London Gazette’, Morning Post, 10 Jan. 1883.

18 Crozier, ‘Antecedents of the Burma Road’, p. 9.

19 See Holt Hallett, A thousand miles on an elephant in the Shan States (London: Kessinger, 1889).

20 Archibald Colquhoun, Overland to China (New York: Harper & Bros, 1900), p. 382.

21 Ibid., p. 415.

22 Ibid., p. 414.

23 ‘Eastern exploration’, Edinburgh Evening News, 8 Jan. 1885; ‘The annexation of Burma’, Dundee Courier, 5 Jan. 1886; ‘Railway construction in China’, Daily Gazette for Middlesbrough, 6 Jan. 1886.

24 Colquhoun, Overland to China, p. 414.

25 Crozier, ‘Antecedents of the Burma Road’, p. 11.

26 Anthony Webster, ‘Business and empire: A reassessment of the British conquest of Burma in 1885’, Historical Journal 4 (2000): 1003–25.

27 David Baillargeon, ‘“On the road to Mandalay”: The development of railways in British Burma, 1870–1900’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 43, 4 (2020): 654–78.

28 Crozier, ‘Antecedents of the Burma Road’, p. 13.

29 Rousseau, ‘An imperial railway failure’, p. 5.

30 Major Davies, Thomas Holdich, Fred Garey, Logan Jack, John Halliday and C.H.D Ryder, ‘Exploration in western China: Discussion’, Geographical Journal 21, 2 (1903): 120–26.

31 H.R. Davies, Yun-nan: The link between India and the Yangtze (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1909), p. 7.

32 Ibid., p. 7.

33 Baillargeon, ‘On the road to Mandalay’.

34 Earl of Ronaldshay, The life of Lord Curzon: Being the authorized biography of George Nathaniel Marquess Curzon of Kedleston (London: Kessinger, 1928), p. 202.

35 Crozier, ‘Antecedents of the Burma Road’, pp. 15–16.

36 Thomas Mullaney, Coming to terms with the nation: Ethnic classification in modern China (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011).

37 Joseph Edkins, ‘Tieluyouyishuo’ [The benefits of railways], Zhongxijianwen 10 (1873): 31–7.

38 ‘Dayingyikai yindulunchetielu’ [The British are considering building railways in India], Jiaohuixinbao, 7 Sept. 1872.

39 ‘Hanhuangyinyou tieluyunliang jiuhuojimin’ [Starving people being saved by foodstuffs transported via railways], Wanguogongbao, 24 Apr. 1875.

40 Qingdaiwaijiaodanganhuibian [Collections of Diplomatic Archives of the Qing Dynasty, hereafter Qing Diplomatic Archives], Choubanyiwushimo, vol. 31, 1865 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2008).

41 Qing Diplomatic Archives, Choubanyiwushimo, vol. 45, 1866 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2008).

42 Qing Diplomatic Archives, Choubanyiwushimo, vol. 54, 1867 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2008).

43 Qing Diplomatic Archives, Choubanyiwushimo, vol. 56, 1867 (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2008).

44 ‘Daeguoshi: Nizaotieludaodizhongyuan’ [Russian affairs: Planning to build railways to China], Wanguogongbao, 28 Nov. 1874.

45 ‘Lunerenzhuanyitielu zhongguobukebubei’ [The Russians are focusing on railway construction and the Chinese have to respond with preparation], Wanguogongbao, 8 Feb. 1879.

46 ‘Lunerennizengjiantieluzhihuohan’ [The Russians plan to build railways to the Khanate of Kokand], Wanguogongbao, 24 Jan. 1880.

47 Wang Yanwei and Wang Liang, eds, Qingjiwaijiaoshiliaozhiguangxuchao, vol. 84, 1891 (Beijing: Shumuwenxian chubanshe, 1987).

48 Wang Yanwei and Wang Liang, eds, Qingjiwaijiaoshiliaozhiguangxuchao, vol. 117, 1895 (Beijing: Shumuwenxian chubanshe, 1987); Wang Yanwei and Wang Liang, eds, Qingjiwaijiaoshiliaozhiguangxuchao, vol. 118, 1895 (Beijing: Shumuwenxian chubanshe, 1987).

49 Wang and Wang, Qingjiwaijiaoshiliaozhiguangxuchao, vol. 118, 1895.

50 The Qing government formally approved the construction of railway in China in May 1889; see Fu Rucheng, ed., Zhongguojindaitielushiziliao (1863–1911) [Materials on the history of modern Chinese railways, 1863–1911] (Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1963), p. 171.

51 Yang Yonggang, Zhongguojindaitielushi [A history of modern Chinese railways] (Shanghai: Shanghaishudianchubanshe, 1997), p. 25.

52 Reisz, Emma, ‘Projecting the road: Topological photography on the Yunnan–Burma frontier’, Chinese Historical Review 25, 2 (2018): 143–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

53 Rana Mitter identifies the May Fourth movement in 1919 as the defining moment of modern Chinese nationalism. See Rana Mitter, A bitter revolution: China's struggle with the modern world (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005). The case of the Yunnan–Burma railway, however, shows that nationalism among the Chinese socioeconomic elites had already gained momentum by the early 1900s. See also Robert Bickers, Out of China: How the Chinese ended the era of Western domination (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017).

54 Fu, Liu, Zhongguotieluyaojian [A brief index to the Chinese railways] (Tokyo: Zhongguoshulin, 1905), p. 37Google Scholar.

55 ‘Yingrenyizhudianmiantielu’ [The British were considering building the Yunnan–Burma railway], Shenbao, 16 Feb. 1908.

56 ‘Wenyingrenyubandianmianlu’ [Learning that the British were planning to build the Yunnan–Burma railway], Shenbao, 2 May 1910.

57 ‘Liudongquantiguorenshang quandianshenshiyandianmiantieluqi’ [A note on the Yunnan–Burma railway forwarded by all Chinese citizens in Japan to all Yunnanese], Yunnan 2 (1906): 131–3.

58 ‘Liuxuesheng dianzuxiliangfudianchengdu’ [Students studying abroad telegraphed to boycott the appointment of Xiliang], Shenbao, 9 May 1907.

59 ‘Lvshuyunnantongxiangquantidaibiao weipianmajiewuchengchuanduwen’ [Appeal to the Governor of Sichuan with regard to the boundary issues of Pianma by representatives of the Yunnan businessmen in Sichuan], Shenbao, 19 Aug. 1911.

60 ‘Dianmiantieluzhijiaoshe’ [Negotiations with regard to the Yunnan–Burma railway], Jiaotongyanjiuhuibaogao 2 (1927): 39–46.

61 ‘Dianmianbianwuyuxinandaju’ [The boundary issues in Yunnan and Burma and the political situation in southwest China], Jianguoyuekan (Shanghai) 1 (1929): 53–9.

62 Tsui, Brian, China's conservative revolution: The quest for a new order, 1927–1949 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Academia Historica (AH), Taipei, 020-011110-0022, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 2, 19 May 1939.

64 AH, 020-011110-0022, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 2, 14 July 1938.

65 AH, 020-011110-0022, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 2, 2 July 1938.

66 AH, 020-011110-0022, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 2, 6 July 1938.

67 AH, 020-011110-0022, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 2, 22 May 1938.

68 AH, 020-011110-0022, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 1, 17 Apr. 1940.

69 AH, 020-011110-0021, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 1, 26 Apr. 1940.

70 Before 1940, the land between Kunlong and the southern bank of the Nanding River was undemarcated. The Chinese compromise of allowing the British to build railways from Kunlong to the Nanding River indicated that the Chinese Nationalist government would give the land to Burma. See AH, 020-011110-0021, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 1, 4 May 1940.

71 AH, 020-011110-0021, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 1, 6 June 1940.

72 Mullaney, Coming to terms with the nation.

73 Foreign Office Records, The National Archives, London (FO), 271/27610, Burma–Yunnan Railway (Folder 1), from Chinese Embassy, London to R.A. Butler, Foreign Office, 12 Feb. 1941.

74 ‘Extension of railway line to China border’, Rangoon Gazette, 4 Apr. 1941.

75 Bayly, Christopher and Harper, Tim, Forgotten armies: Britain's Asian empire and the war with Japan (New York: Penguin, 2005), pp. 152205Google Scholar.

76 AH, 020-011110-0022, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 2, 7 June 1939.

77 FO, 271/27610, Burma-Yunnan Railway (Folder 1), from the Governor of Burma to the Under Secretary of State, Foreign Office, 4 Jan. 1941.

78 FO, 271/27610, Burma–Yunnan Railway (Folder 1), from Secretary of State to Governor of Burma, 8 Jan. 1941.

79 For the list of the Mission, see FO, 271/27610, Burma–Yunnan Railway (Folder 1), from Secretary of State to Governor of Burma, 29 Dec. 1940.

80 FO, 271/27610, Burma–Yunnan Railway (Folder 1), from Governor of Burma to S. of S. for Burma, 20 Jan. 1941.

81 AH, 020-011110-0021, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 1, 24 Jan. 1941.

82 FO, 271/27610, Burma–Yunnan Railway (Folder 1), from Sir F. Leith-Ross to Mr Butler, 16 Jan. 1941.

83 A budget of £250 million was proposed by Leith-Ross and accepted by the British government; see FO, 271/27610, Burma–Yunnan Railway (Folder 1), from Burma Office to Butler, 13 Feb. 1941.

84 AH, 020-011110-0021, Waijiaobu, Dianmianyunshu-Tielu 1, 11 Mar. 1941.

85 FO, 371/31631, Burma–Yunnan Railway 1942, from War Office to Mr Sterndale Bennett, 7 Jan. 1942.

86 FO, 371/46261, Burma–Yunnan Railway 1945, from Chungking dispatch, 6 Feb. 1945.

87 FO, 371/46261, Burma–Yunnan Railway 1945, from the Under Secretary of State, Foreign Office to Burma Office, 21 July 1945.