Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T20:50:57.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Indochinese Congress (May 1936–March 1937): False Hope of Vietnamese Nationalists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

Sud Chonchirdsin
Affiliation:
Chulalongkom University

Abstract

During May 1936 and March 1937 there were attempts by different political factions in Cochin China to form an Indochinese Congress. The congress was planned as a people's assembly in which the Vietnamese could negotiate colonial reforms with French authorities. Such attempts revealed competition among different political factions and also reflected a genuine French effort to introduce reforms and liberalize the Indochinese colony. The congress movement was eventually suppressed by French authorities, but it provided the Indochinese Communist Party (ICP) with access to the masses and helped the Party expand its political activities into the Mekong Delta during the latter half of the 1930s.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This is paper was first presented at the 15th IAHA Conference, Jakarta, Indonesia, 27th Aug.–lst Sep. 1998.

2 La Lutte, 3 June 1936.

3 ”Tho Cong Khai Cua Trung Uong Dang Cong San Dong Duong Gui Cho Cac Dong Chi Toan Dang”, in Van Kien Dang (Hanoi: Ban Nghien Cuu Lich Su Dang Trung Uong, 1977), tap 2, pp. 6667.Google Scholar

4 Ibid., p. 68.

5 Centre d'Archives d'Outre-Mer (henceforth CAOM), Fonds Moutet (PA 28), carton 3, dossier 67; cited in Daniel Hémery, Révolutionnaires Vietnamiens et Pouvoir Colonial en Indochine (Paris: François Maspéro, 1975), p. 309.Google Scholar

6 ”Rapport mensuel sur la situation politique du Tonkin (Juillet et Août 1936)”, CAOM, Sûreté 7F 30(5); and Hémery, Révolutionnaires, p. 309.

7 Ibid., p. 309.

8 ”Rapports mensuels sur la situation politique du Tonkin (Août 1937, Décembre 1937)”, CAOM, Sûreté 7F 30(5).

9 Hémery, Révolutionnaires, p. 310.

10 Viet, Hoang Quoc, A Heroic People (Hanoi: Foreign Language Publishing House, 1965), p. 176Google Scholar; see also Thang, Nguyen Q. and The, Nguyen Ba, Tu Dien Nhan Vat Lich Su Viet Nam (Hanoi: NXB Khoa Hoc Xa Hoi, 1992), p. 688.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., p. 688.

12 ”Rapport mensuel sur la situation politique au Tonkin (Février 1937)”, CAOM, Sûreté 7F 30(5).

13 Hémery, Révolutionnaires, p. 295.

14 Ibid., pp. 296–98.

15 ”Dang Cong San Dong Duong Va Dong Duong Dai Hoi”, in Van Kien Dang, tap 2, p. 83.

16 Hémery, Révolutionnaires, p. 300; and “Phong Trao Dong Duong Dai Hoi”, in Nhung Su Kien Lich Su Dang, 1920–45 (Hanoi: Su That, 1976), pp. 373–77.Google Scholar

17 ”Rapport mensuel sur la situation politique du Tonkin (Septembre 1936)”, CAOM, Sûreté 7F 30(5).

19 ”Le Congres Indochinois”, French translation of article in Mat Tran Do (Red Front), 19 Sep. 1936; CAOM, SLOTFOM V, carton 41.

21 Smith, R.B., “Bui Quang Chieu and the Constitutionalist Party in French Cochin China, 1917—30”, Modern Asian Studies 3,2 (1969): 132–33, 138, 142, 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 ”Pour la Réalisation du Congrès Indochinois” (translation of Vietnamese newspaper article from unknown source, dated 27 Aug. 1936), CAOM, SLOTFOM III, carton 101.

23 Hémery, Révolutionnaires, p. 313.

24 ”Dong Duong Dai Hoi” (9 Sep. 1936) in Van Kien Dang, tap 2, p. 92.Google Scholar

25 Hémery, Révolutionnaires, pp. 318–20.

26 Telegram no. 412, 8 Sep. 1936; La Lutte, 16 Sep. 1936; and telegram no. 413, 8 Sep. 1936; telegrams cited in Hémery, Révolutionnaires, pp. 322–23.

27 Ibid., p. 323.

28 La Dépêche de l'Indochine, 21 Sep. 1936, quoted in Hémery, Révolutionnaires, pp. 325–26.Google Scholar

29 ”Une Déclaration des Français de Gauche contre les mensonges officiels”, La Lutte, 1 Nov. 1936.Google Scholar

30 Telegram no. 664, 5 Nov. 1936, CAOM, SLOTFOM III, carton 101.

31 Note no. 186-C (Chef de la province de Long Xuyên à M. le Gouverneur de la Cochinchine, 30 Sep. 1936) and Note no. 405-C (Chef de la province de Gia Dinh à M. le Gouverneur de la Cochinchine, 7 Nov. 1936); NA II (Vietnamese National Archives, Ho Chi Minh City), IIA, 45/323(2).

32 Note no. 1538-S, CAOM, Sûreté de Cochinchine, Mar. 1937.

33 Cited in Hémery, Révolutionnaires, p. 331.

34 ”Note pour le Ministre: Action de M. Duong Bach Mai”, CAOM, Fonds Moutet (PA 28), carton 2, dossier 14 (Mar. 1937).

37 Hémery, Révolutionnaires, p. 381.

38 Ibid., p. 385.

39 It is not clear whether Justin Godart held a Cabinet post at the time. A report from the Governor of Cochin China to the Governor-General on Godart's visit, dated 18 Feb. 1937, noted that he was a senator at the time and occasionally referred to him as an ”ancien ministre”. See “L'arrivé de M. le Senateur Justin Godart” (18 Feb. 1937), CAOM, Affaires Politiques, carton 366.

40 Hémery, Révolutionnaires, p. 387.

41 Note no. 1538-S, Sûretê de Cochinchine, Mar. 1937; CAOM, Fonds SPCE, carton 384.

42 ”Pour la Réalisation du Congrès Indochinois” (translation of Vietnamese documents), CAOM, SLOTFOM III, carton 101; letter from Minister of Colonies to Governor-General of Indochina (12 Jan. 1937), CAOM, Fonds Moutet (PA 28), carton 3, dossier 75.