Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T12:29:57.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bureaucratic migrants and the potential of prosperity in upland Laos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2011

Abstract

This paper argues that Lao bureaucrats who migrate to the uplands offer possibilities for re-thinking the immutability of upland–lowland distinctions and the power of the modern state. The specific focus is on low-ranking government officials on the Nakai Plateau in central Laos who are positioned at the nexus of state authority, development schemes and the rural poor. Nakai is a site of nationally significant resource utilisation and practices that has provided a model for development across the country. Officials' experiences in Nakai suggest that the upland–lowland contrast can provide valuable understandings of power when combined with an awareness of social processes that reproduce and shift the meanings ascribed to these nominally distinct domains. Significantly, the experiences of mobile marginal officials highlight an idea of state power as the potential to grant prosperity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Jonsson, Hjorleifur, ‘Yao minority identity and the location of difference in the South China borderlands’, Ethnos, 65, 1 (2000): 76CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Charles Keyes, F., The golden peninsula: Culture and adaptation in mainland Southeast Asia (Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 1995)Google Scholar; and Turton, Andrew, Civility and savagery: Social identity in Tai states (Richmond: Curzon Press, 2000)Google Scholar.

2 For example, Dressler, Wolfram H. and Turner, Sarah, ‘The persistence of social differentiation in the Philippine uplands’, Journal of Development Studies, 44, 10 (2008): 1450–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Li, Tania M., ‘Engaging simplifications: Community-based resource management, market processes and state agendas in upland Southeast Asia’, World Development, 30, 2 (2002): 265–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 For example, Jonsson, ‘Yao minority identity’; Singh, Sarinda, Natural potency and political power: Forests and state authority in contemporary Laos (Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, in press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sillander, Kenneth, ‘Local integration and coastal connections in interior Kalimantan: The case of the nalin taun ritual among the Bentian’, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies [hereafter, JSEAS], 37, 2 (2006): 315–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sturgeon, Janet C., ‘Border practices, boundaries, and the control of resource access: A case from China, Thailand and Burma’, Development and Change, 35, 3 (2004): 463–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tooker, Deborah, ‘Putting the mandala in its place: A practice-based approach to the spatialization of power on the Southeast Asian “periphery” – The case of the Akha’, Journal of Asian Studies, 55, 2 (1996): 323–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Walker, Andrew, The legend of the golden boat: Regulation, trade and traders in the borderlands of Laos, Thailand, China and Burma (Richmond: Curzon Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

4 Jonsson, Hjorleifur, ‘Review of “Civility and savagery: Social identity in Tai states”’, JSEAS, 32, 3 (2001): 466Google Scholar.

5 Tooker, ‘Putting the mandala in its place’; Leach, Edmund R., Political systems of highland Burma: A study of Kachin social structure (London: Athlone Press, 1970)Google Scholar.

6 But see, Pholsena, Vatthana, Post-war Laos: The politics of culture, history and identity (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Civilizing the margins: Southeast Asian government policies for the development of minorities, ed. Duncan, Christopher R. (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004), pp. 45Google Scholar.

8 Tooker, Deborah, ‘Modular modern: Shifting forms of collective identity among the Akha of northern Thailand’, Anthropological Quarterly, 77, 2 (2004): 261CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also, Cohen, Paul T., ‘Resettlement, opium and labour dependence: Akha-Tai relations in northern Laos’, Development and Change, 31, 1 (2000): 179200CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Michaud, Jean, ‘Handling mountain minorities in China, Vietnam and Laos: From history to current concerns’, Asian Ethnicity, 10, 1 (2009): 2549CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Scott, James C., The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia (New Haven: Yale University, 2009)Google ScholarPubMed.

9 Gupta, Akhil, ‘Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state’, American Ethnologist, 22, 2 (1995): 375402CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Herzfeld, Michael, Cultural intimacy: Social poetics in the nation-state, 2nd edn. (New York: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar; Koh, David, ‘Negotiating the socialist state in Vietnam through local administrators: The case of karaoke shops’, Sojourn, 16, 2 (2001): 279305CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pholsena, Post-war Laos.

10 For example, Hardy, Andrew, ‘Strategies of migration to upland areas in contemporary Vietnam’, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 41, 1 (2000): 2334CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Li, ‘Engaging simplifications’, p. 268; and Michaud, ‘Handling mountain minorities’, p. 27.

11 On mobility in Laos, see Asian Development Bank, Broken lives: Trafficking in human beings in Lao People's Democratic Republic (Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2009)Google Scholar; Baird, Ian G. and Shoemaker, Bruce, ‘Unsettling experiences: Internal resettlement and international aid agencies in Laos’, Development and Change, 38, 5 (2007): 865–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cohen, ‘Resettlement, opium and labour dependence’; Evrard, Olivier and Goudineau, Yves, ‘Planned resettlement, unexpected migrations and cultural trauma in Laos’, Development and Change, 35, 5 (2004): 937–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Government of Lao PDR [hereafter GOL] and United Nations Children's Fund [hereafter UNICEF], Broken promises, shattered dreams: A profile of child trafficking in the Lao PDR (Vientiane: GOL and UNICEF, 2005)Google Scholar; Molland, Sverre, ‘Human trafficking and poverty reduction: Two sides of the same coin?’, Juth Pakai (New Thought): Perspectives on Lao Development, 4 (2005): 2737Google Scholar; Rigg, Jonathan, ‘Moving lives: Migration and livelihoods in the Lao PDR’, Population, Space and Place, 13, 3 (2007): 163–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Rigg, Jonathan, Living with transition in Laos: Living with change in Southeast Asia (London: Routledge Curzon, 2005)Google Scholar; and Walker, The legend of the golden boat.

12 See also, GOL, ‘National growth and poverty eradication strategy (NGPES)’ (Vientiane: GOL, 2003), pp. 4–5, http://www.undplao.org/newsroom/publication/Ngpes/Lao%20PDR%20-%20NGPES%20-%20Main%20Document.pdf (last accessed on 16 Mar. 2011); and GOL, ‘Forestry strategy to the year 2020 (FS 2020) of the Lao PDR’ (Vientiane: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, GOL, 2005), foreword, http://dof.maf.gov.la/docs/FS2020.pdf (last accessed on 16 Mar. 2011).

13 Evers, Hans-Dieter, ‘The bureaucratization of Southeast Asia’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 29, 4 (1987): 666–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Calvert, Peter, ‘Internal colonisation, development and environment’, Third World Quarterly, 22, 1 (2001): 5163CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Scott, The art of not being governed.

15 Vandergeest, Peter and Peluso, Nancy L., ‘Territorialization and state power in Thailand’, Theory and Society, 24, 3 (1995): 385426CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Territorialisation conveys less negative connotations than notions of internal colonisation; Li, ‘Engaging simplifications’, p. 277.

16 Goldman, Michael, Imperial nature: The World Bank and struggles for social justice in the age of globalization (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005)Google Scholar; but also see Singh, Sarinda, ‘World Bank-directed development?: Negotiating participation in the Nam Theun 2 hydropower project in Laos’, Development and Change, 40, 3 (2009): 487507CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Sheller, Mimi and Urry, John, ‘The new mobilities paradigm’, Environment and Planning A, 38, 2 (2006): 208CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Ibid.

19 See Gupta, ‘Blurred boundaries’.

20 For example, United Nations Public Administration Network [hereafter UNPAN], ‘Lao People's Democratic Republic public administration country profile’ (Vientiane: UNPAN, 2005), http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan023237.pdf (last accessed on 16 Mar. 2011); Martin Stuart-Fox, Politics and reform in the Lao People's Democratic Republic, Political economy of development working paper no. 1, p. 11 (Williamsburg: The College of William and Mary, 2004).

21 Singh, Sarinda, ‘Living within the state: A dormitory community in central Laos’, in Tai lands and Thailand: Community and state in Southeast Asia, ed. Walker, Andrew (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS), 2009), pp. 141–65Google Scholar. I was based in Laos from March 2003 until July 2005. In the latter 12 months, I travelled regularly between Vientiane and Nakai, spending a total of six months in Nakai. For most of this time I lived in the dormitory for forestry officials in the Nakai district centre, a shorter period was spent living in a nearby village. Subsequent visits to Nakai after the main period of my fieldwork indicated many changes because of NT2, which are not considered here.

22 Baird and Shoemaker, ‘Unsettling experiences’; Cohen, ‘Resettlement, opium and labour dependence’; Evrard and Goudineau, ‘Planned resettlement, unexpected migrations and cultural trauma’.

23 Nam Theun 2 Power Company, ‘Nam Theun 2 hydroelectric project, social development plan (SDP): Volume II’ (Vientiane: Nam Theun 2 Power Company, 2004).

24 For clarity, I refer to the Nakai district centre in terms of its administrative position, though it has different official and common names.

25 Evans, Grant, A short history of Laos: The land in between (Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, 2002)Google Scholar.

26 Singh, Natural potency and political power. For northern Laos, see, for example, Walker, The legend of the golden boat.

27 Stuart-Fox, Martin, ‘The political culture of corruption in the Lao PDR’, Asian Studies Review, 30, 1 (2006), 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Lintner, Bertil, ‘Laos: At the crossroads’, Southeast Asian Affairs, 2008 (2008): 179CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Singh, ‘Living within the state’.

30 Ibid.

31 Evers, ‘Bureaucratization of Southeast Asia’, p. 682. See also, Koh, ‘Negotiating the socialist state in Vietnam’.

32 GOL, ‘Forestry strategy to the year 2020’, p. 67.

33 Halpern, Joel M., Government, politics, and social structure in Laos: A study of tradition and innovation, Monograph Series No. 4 (New Haven: Southeast Asia Studies, Yale University, 1964), p. 82Google Scholar.

34 Ibid., p. 69.

35 Ibid., p. 111.

36 Evans, A short history of Laos, p. 179.

37 Halpern, ‘Government, politics, and social structure in Laos’, p. 41.

38 St John, Ronald B., ‘The political economy of Laos: Poor state or poor policy?’, Asian Affairs, 37, 2 (2006): 175–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Stuart-Fox, ‘Politics and reform’; Stuart-Fox, ‘The political culture of corruption’.

39 GOL, ‘National growth and poverty eradication strategy’, p. 47.

40 This is due to the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry's responsibility for rural development and the district's role as the point of policy implementation; ibid., pp. 34–5, 48.

41 Halpern, ‘Government, politics, and social structure in Laos’, pp. 36, 71.

42 Elsewhere, I consider poverty alleviation and social equality as ‘myths of governance’ that dominate official rhetoric, but are contradicted by daily life in the forestry dormitory; Singh, ‘Living within the state’, pp. 149–58.

43 Rigg, ‘Moving lives’, p. 165. A couple of officials also noted that those with money and connections are able to avoid such requirements.

44 Molland, ‘Human trafficking and poverty reduction’, pp. 29, 36, 33.

45 About 88 per cent of all government officials in Laos are ethnic Lao or related Tai ethnic minorities, though they only make up about 66 per cent of the total population; UNPAN, ‘Lao People's Democratic Republic public administration country profile’, p. 5.

46 Mills, Mary B., ‘Migrant labor takes a holiday: Reworking modernity and marginality in contemporary Thailand’, Critique of Anthropology, 19, 1 (1999): 3151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

47 See also, Singh, Natural potency and political power.

48 Jackson, Peter A., ‘The Thai regime of images’, Sojourn, 19, 2 (2004): 181CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 See Anonymous, ‘Lessons learned from the district upland development and conservation project, Lao PDR’ (Vientiane: World Bank, 2003).

50 Scott, James C., Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985)Google Scholar.

51 See Osella, Filippo and Osella, Caroline, ‘Migration, money and masculinity in Kerala’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 6, 1 (2000): 117–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 Reynolds, Craig J., ‘Power’, in Critical terms for the study of Buddhism, ed. Lopez, Donald S. Jr. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2005), pp. 216–17Google Scholar.

53 Tooker, ‘Putting the mandala in its place’, pp. 342–3. See also Walker, Andrew, ‘Matrilineal spirits, descent and territorial power in northern Thailand’, in Australian Journal of Anthropology, 17, 2 (2006): 198CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 For instance, Tooker occasionally uses ‘prosperity’ interchangeably with ‘fertility’, but she does not specifically discuss the former and she still distinguishes between natural or sacred potency that provides fertility and political power of the state; Tooker, ‘Putting the mandala in its place’, pp. 332, 327–8. See also, Keyes, The golden peninsula, pp. 41–2, 66.

55 Winichakul, Thongchai, ‘The quest for “siwilai”: A geographical discourse of civilizational thinking in the late nineteenth and early twentieth-century Siam’, Journal of Asian Studies, 59, 3 (2000): 531Google Scholar.

56 See, for example, Pholsena, Post-war Laos; and Stuart-Fox, ‘Politics and reform’.

57 Political legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The quest for moral authority, ed. Alagappa, Muthiah (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

58 GOL, ‘National growth and poverty eradication strategy’; GOL, ‘Forestry strategy to the year 2020’; Singh, Natural potency and political power.

59 For example, Barney, Keith, ‘Laos and the making of a “relational” resource frontier’, Geographical Journal, 175, 2 (2009): 146–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Jonsson, Hjorleifur, ‘Forest products and peoples: Upland groups, Thai polities, and regional space’, Sojourn, 13, 1 (1998): 137CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

60 ‘PM rallies defence of protected forests’, Vientiane Times, 2 Mar. 2007.

61 Ibid.

62 This is usually a sack of pinewood since it is relatively common in Nakai; small pieces of the resinous wood are used for starting cooking fires. Less common were small pieces of more valued wood such as mai dam (scientific name Aquilaria spp.).

63 Singh, Natural potency and political power.

64 Sheller and Urry, ‘The new mobilities paradigm’, p. 211.

65 See also Singh, ‘Living within the state’.