Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

What Welfare States Do: A Disaggregated Expenditure Approach1

  • FRANCIS G. CASTLES (a1)

Abstract

This article suggests that an alternative to a social rights of citizenship approach to comparing welfare states is to use disaggregated programme expenditure data to identify the diverse spending priorities of different types of welfare state. An initial descriptive analysis shows that four major categories of social spending (cash spending on older people and those of working age; service spending on health and for other purposes) are almost entirely unrelated to one another and that different welfare state regimes or families of nations exhibit quite different patterns of spending. The article proceeds to demonstrate that both the determinants and the outcomes of these different categories of spending also differ quite radically. In policy terms, most importantly, the article shows that cross-national differences in poverty and inequality among advanced nations are to a very large degree a function of the extent of cash spending on programmes catering to the welfare needs of those of working age.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Adema, W. and Ladaique, M. (2005), Net Social Expenditure, 2005 Edition: More Comprehensive Measures of Social Support, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 29, Paris: OECD.
Armingeon, K., Leimgruber, P., Beyeler, M. and Menegale, S. (2006), ‘Comparative political data set 1960–2004’, Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
Buhr, P. and Leibfried, S. (1995), ‘“What a difference a day makes”: the significance for social policy of the duration of social assistance receipt’, in Room, G. (ed.), Beyond the Threshold: The Measurement and Analysis of Social Exclusion, Bristol: Policy Press.
Castles, F. G. (1994), ‘Is expenditure enough? On the nature of the dependent variable in comparative public policy analysis’, Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 33: 3, 349–63.
Castles, F. G. (1995), ‘Welfare state development in Southern Europe’, West European Politics, 18: 2, 291313.
Castles, F. G. (1998), Comparative Public Policy: Patterns of Post-war Transformation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Castles, F. G. (2002), ‘Developing new measures of welfare state change and reform’, European Journal of Political Research, 41: 613–41.
Castles, F. G. (2004), The Future of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castles, F. G. (2006), ‘The growth of the post-war public expenditure state: long-term trajectories and recent trends’, TranState Working Paper No 35, Bremen University.
Castles, F. G. and Obinger, H. (2007), ‘Social expenditure and the politics of redistribution’, Journal of European Social Policy, 17: 3, 206–22.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1993), ‘Budgets and democracy: towards a welfare state in Spain and Portugal, 1960–1986’, in Budge, I. and McKay, D. (eds.), Expanding Democracy: Research in Honour of Jean Blondel, London: Sage.
Ferrera, M. (1996), ‘The “southern model” of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6: 1, 1737.
Goldthorpe, J. (1997), ‘Current issues in comparative macrosociology: a debate on methodological issues’, Cognitive Social Research, 16: 126.
Heston, A., Summers, R. and Aten, B. (2006), Penn World Table Version 6.2, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.
Huber, E. and Stephens, J. (2001), Development and the Crisis of the Welfare State, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Katzenstein, P. (1985), Small States in World Markets, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kittel, B. (1999), ‘Sense and sensitivity in pooled analysis of political data’, European Journal of Political Research, 35: 225–53.
Leibfried, S. (1993), ‘Towards a European welfare state?’, in Jones, C. (ed.), New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe, London: Routledge.
Leisering, L. and Leibfried, S. (1999), Time and Poverty in Welfare States: United Germany in Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) (2007), Key Figures, Accessed at http://www.lisproject.org/keyfigures.htm, May 2007.
Myles, J. and Quadagno, J. (2002), ‘Political theories of the welfare state’, Social Science Review, March: 3457.
OECD (1996), Social Expenditure Statistics of OECD Member Countries (Provisional Version), Paris: OECD.
OECD (2007a), OECD Social Expenditure Database, 1980–2003, Paris: OECD.
OECD (2007b), The Social Expenditure Database: An Interpretative Guide, Paris: OECD.
Schmidt, M. (1996), ‘When parties matter: a review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy’, European Journal of Political Research, 30: 2, 155–83.
Scruggs, L. (2004), Welfare State Entitlements Data Set: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Eighteen Welfare States, Version 1.1, Storrs: University of Connecticut.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.) (2004), New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Titmuss, R. (1950), Problems of Social Policy, London: HMSO & Longmans Green.
Van Kersbergen, K. (1995), Social Capitalism: A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State, London: Routledge.
Wilensky, H. (1975), The Welfare State and Equality, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

What Welfare States Do: A Disaggregated Expenditure Approach1

  • FRANCIS G. CASTLES (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.