Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T13:03:02.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Upskilling the Workers will not Upskill the Work. Why the Dominant Economic Framework Limits Child Poverty Reduction in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2010

PAUL LEWIS*
Affiliation:
Birmingham Business School, University of Birmingham email: P.C.Lewis@bham.ac.uk

Abstract

This paper assesses the policy consensus that exists amongst political parties in the UK in their shared ambition to eradicate child poverty by 2020. Three major pillars of policy – work intensification, re-distribution and skill upgrading – are challenged in terms of their likely success in reducing child poverty. In particular, the assumption that upgrading skills will raise earnings is challenged by examining the changing patterns of work in a selection of developed economies since the 1970s. This paper argues that addressing relative poverty requires an alternative theoretical approach to the neoclassical economics that currently underpins policy. Different national levels of earnings dispersion suggest that the role of institutions and culture in determining market outcomes deserves at least as much attention as the supply of skills.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, N., Johnson, G., Matejic, P., Vekaria, R. and Whatley, J. (2009), Households Below Average Income – An Analysis of the Income Distribution 1994/5–2007/8, London: DWP.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. (2008), The Changing Distribution of Earnings in OECD Countries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Autor, D. H., Levy, F. and Murnane, R. J. (2003), ‘The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical investigation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118: 1279–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F. and Kearney, M. S. (2006), ‘The polarization of the US labour market’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 96: 198–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, R. (2007), ‘Calculating human capital: the market based valuation of the human resource’, Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 21: 3, 206–31.Google Scholar
Black, C. (2008), Review of the health of Britain's working age population: working for a healthier tomorrow. An independent report for the Department of Health and DWP, TSO, Norwich.Google Scholar
Blair, T. (2002), ‘Pre-general election’, Newsnight interview, 16 May, London, BBC.Google Scholar
Block, F. L. (1990), Postindustrial Possibilities: A Critique of Economic Discourse, Berkeley, CA and Oxford: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, G. and Weinkopf, C. (2008), ‘Summary and conclusions’, in Bosch, G. and Weinkopf, C. (eds.), Low-Wage Work in Germany, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Brewer, M., Goodman, A., Shaw, J. and Sibieta, L. (2006), Poverty and Inequality in Britain, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Brewer, M., Muriel, A., Phillips, D. and Sibieta, L. (2009), Poverty and Inequality in the UK – 2009, London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., Green, A. and Lauder, H. (2001), High Skills: Globalization, Competitiveness, and Skill Formation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Callanicos, A. (2001), Against the Third Way: An Anti-capitalist Critique, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2005), Speech to the Centre for Social Justice, 18 January.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (2008), ‘My pledge on child poverty’, The Daily Telegraph, 9 March.Google Scholar
Carnoy, M. (1995), ‘Economics of education: then and now’, in Carnoy, M. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Economics of Education, 2nd edn., Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Child Poverty Unit (2009), Ending Child Poverty: Making It Happen, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Coates, D. (1999), ‘Why growth rates differ’, New Political Economy, 4: 1, 7796.Google Scholar
Coates, D. (2005), Prolonged Labour – The Slow Birth of New Labour Britain, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Conservative Party (2008)a, Work for Welfare – REAL Welfare Reform to Help Make British Poverty History, Policy Green Paper No.3, London.Google Scholar
Conservative Party (2008)b, Building Skills, Transforming Lives – a Training and Apprenticeship Revolution, Policy Green Paper No.7, London.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. (2008), ‘What will follow the demise of privatised Keynesianism?’, The Political Quarterly, 79: 4, 476–87.Google Scholar
DCLG (2008), ‘Statistical release – updated council tax levels set by local authorities in England, 2008–9’, available at http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/statistics/pdf/1289074.pdf.Google Scholar
DfES (Department for Education and Skills) (2007), Every Parent Matters: Creating Opportunity, Releasing Potential, Achieving Excellence, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Dolowitz, D. P. (2004), ‘Prosperity and fairness? Can New Labour bring fairness to the 21st century by following the dictates of endogenous growth?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 6: 2, 213–30.Google Scholar
Dorling, D. (2006), ‘Inequalities in Britain 1997–2006: the dream that turned pear-shaped’, Local Economy, 21: 4, 353–61.Google Scholar
Drucker, P. (1993), Post-Capitalist Society, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Dustman, C., Ludsteck, J. and Schoeneberg, U. (2009), ‘Revisiting the German wage structure’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124: 2, 843–81.Google Scholar
DWP (Department for Work and Pensions) (2003), Measuring Child Poverty, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DWP (2005), Five Year Strategy: Opportunity and Security throughout Life, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DWP (2006), Making a Difference: Tackling Poverty – A Progress Report, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DWP (2007), Working for Children – Child Poverty Strategy, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DWP (2008)a, Transforming Britain's Labour Market – Ten Years of the New Deal, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DWP (2008)b, Raising Expectations and Increasing Support: Reforming Welfare for the Future, White Paper London: HMSO.Google Scholar
DWP (2009), ‘Family Resources Survey, 2007–8’, available at http://statistics.dwp.gov.uk/asd/frs/.Google Scholar
DWP and DIUS (2008), ‘Work Skills’, Command Paper, prepared for the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills and the Department for Work and Pensions, TSO.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Fine, B. (1998), Labour Market Theory: A Constructive Reassessment, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finlayson, A. (2009), ‘Financialisation, financial literacy and asset-based welfare’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11: 3, 123.Google Scholar
Freud, D. (2007), ‘Reducing dependency, increasing opportunity: options for the future of welfare to work’, an independent report to the Department for Work and Pensions, HMSO.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. (2001), ‘The macroeconomics of income distribution’, in Galbraith, J. K. and Berner, M. (eds.), Inequality and Industrial Change: A Global View, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gamble, A. (2005), ‘Commentary: the meaning of the third way’, in Seldon, A. and Kavanagh, D. (eds.), The Blair Effect 2001–5, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
GGDC (Groningen Growth and Development Centre) (2008), The EU KLEMS database, available at http://www.euklems.net/.Google Scholar
Glyn, A. (2000), ‘Unemployment and inequality’, in Jenkinson, T. (ed.), Readings in Macroeconomics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goos, M. and Manning, A. (2007), ‘Lousy and lovely jobs: the rising polarization of work in Britain’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 89: 1, 118–33.Google Scholar
Gregg, P. (2008), ‘Realising potential: a vision for personalised conditionality and support’, an independent report to the Department for Work and Pensions, HMSO.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. W. (2001), ‘Introduction’, in Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. W. (eds.), The Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harker, L. (2007), ‘Child poverty and party politics: what hopes of a consensus?’, Poverty, 128 (Autumn).Google Scholar
Hay, C. (1999), The Political Economy of New Labour, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Heffernan, R. (2000), New Labour and Thatcherism, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
HM Government UK (2000), Statutory Instrument 2000 No. 1551 – The Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000.Google Scholar
HMRC (2009), ‘TCTM07APPX2 – Tax credit calculation of entitlement: a worked example’, available at http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/tctmanual/TCTM07APPX2.htm.Google Scholar
HMRC (2010), ‘Income tax, national insurance and tax credit allowances and bands’, available at www.hmrc.gov.uk.Google Scholar
Iversen, T. and Wren, A. (1998), ‘Employment and budgetary restraint: the trilemma of the service economy’, World Politics, 50: 4, 507–46.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. (2008), Welfare and Well-being: Social Value in Public Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. and Duevell, F. (2003), Migration: The Boundaries of Equality and Justice, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Larsen, T. P., Taylor-Gooby, P. and Kananen, J. (2006), ‘New Labour's policy style: a mix of policy approaches’, Journal of Social Policy, 35: 4, 629–49.Google Scholar
Leitch, S. (2006), Review of Skills: Prosperity for All in the Global Economy – World Class Skills, A Review for HM Treasury and the Department for Education and Skills, Norwich: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Levitas, R. (2005), The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. (2009), ‘Understanding income distribution in modern capitalist economies’, Ph.D. thesis, Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Liberal Democrats (2007), ‘Freedom from poverty, opportunity for all’, Policy Paper 80, London.Google Scholar
Liberal Democrats (2009), ‘Investing in talent, building the economy – policies for adult further and higher education’, Policy Paper 90, London.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (1988), ‘On the mechanics of economic development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 1, 342.Google Scholar
Machin, S. (2001), ‘The changing nature of labour demand in the new economy and skill-biased technology change’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 63: s1, 753–76.Google Scholar
Mason, G., Mayhew, K. and Osborne, M. (2008), ‘Low-paid work in the United Kingdom: an overview’, in Lloyd, C., Mason, G. and Mayhew, K. (eds.), Low-Wage Work in the United Kingdom, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
OECD (1994), The OECD Jobs Study: Facts, Analysis, Strategies, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
ONS (2010), Labour Force Survey, Leeds: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
Page, R. M. (2007), ‘Without a song in their heart: New Labour, the welfare state and the retreat from democratic socialism’, Journal of Social Policy, 36: 1, 1937.Google Scholar
Romer, P. (1986), ‘Increasing returns and long-run growth’, Journal of Political Economy, 94: 5, 1002–37.Google Scholar
Scholz, C. (2007), ‘Editorial: Human capital management – a long and winding road’, Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 21: 3, 203–05.Google Scholar
Solow, R. (2008) ‘Introduction – the German story’, in Bosch, G. and Weinkopf, C. (eds.), Low-Wage Work in Germany, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Spitz-Oener, A. (2006), ‘Technical change, job tasks and rising educational demands: looking outside the wage structure’, Journal of Labor Economics, 24: 235–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodore, N. (2007), ‘New Labour at work: long term unemployment and the geography of opportunity’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31: 6, 927–39.Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. (1995), Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar