Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T05:45:43.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three paths to more encompassing supplementary pensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2017

MARGARITA GELEPITHIS
MARGARITA GELEPITHIS*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL email: m.gelepithis@warwick.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In pension systems characterized by low or moderate state benefits, reliance on voluntary private pensions creates a dualism of access to adequate retirement income. This dualism is expected to persist over time. Yet while some private-heavy pension systems continue to rely on dualising voluntarism, since the 1980s most have introduced regulatory reforms to make private pensions more encompassing. This paper uses fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis to identify three paths to the regulatory extension of private pension coverage – collective self-regulation, top-down regulation in Continental Europe, and top-down regulation in Anglophone countries. A case study of the UK then shows how it is that unions have been able to bring about more encompassing private pensions in Anglophone countries, despite strong employer opposition, weak formal influence in policymaking, and a weak institutional capacity for collective self-regulation.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , July 2018 , pp. 603 - 623
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABI. (2003), Simplicity, Security and Choice: ABI response to the the Pensions Green Paper. London: ABI.Google Scholar
ABI. (2005a), Challenges and Choices: ABI Response to the First Report of the Pensions Commission. London: ABI.Google Scholar
ABI. (2005b), Serious about Saving: The ABI agenda for action on state and private pension reform. London: ABI.Google Scholar
Adams, C. and Turner, D. (2005, 2 Feb.), Unions threaten Blair attempt to keep party united. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2306435942&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Anderson, K. M. (2006), The Netherlands: Political Competition in a Proportional System. In , E. M. Immergut, Anderson, K. M. & Schulze, I. (Eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Armingeon, K., Weisstanner, S. E., Potolidis, P., Gerber, M. and Leimgruber, P. (2011), Comparative Political Data Set I 1960–2009. University of Berne.Google Scholar
Barber, B. (2004, 14 Oct), Further incentives unlikely to restore employer pension contributions to the level that is needed. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2304737517&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Blitz, J. and Smith, A. (1996, 6 Feb.), Parties poised for battle over pensions. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2305148502&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Bonoli, G. (2006), Switzerland: the impact of direct democracy. In Immergut, E. M., Anderson, K. M. & Schulze, I. (Eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bridgen, P. and Meyer, T. (2005), When do Benevolent Capitalists Change Their Mind? Explaining the Retrenchment of Defined-Benefit Pensions in Britain. Social Policy and Administration, 39 (7), 764–785.Google Scholar
Brown, K. (2004, 3 Nov.), Employers may have to pay into pensions. Financial Timees. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2306321380&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Castle, B. and Townsend, P. (1996), We CAN afford the Welfare State Security in Retirement for Everyone. London.Google Scholar
Clark, G. L. (2003), Twenty-first century pension (in-)security. In Clark, G. L. & Whiteside, N. (Eds.), Pension Security in the 21st Century. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cohen, N. (1996, 24 Jan), Pension Reform Would Make Wealthier Save More. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2305886157&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Commonwealth Treasury of Australia. (2001), A History of the Australian Retirement Income System Since Federation. Economic Roundup, Centenary 2001.Google Scholar
DWP. (2006a), Personal Accounts: A New Way to Save. White Paper, Cm675. DWP.Google Scholar
DWP. (2006b), Security in Retirement: Towards a New Pension System. White Paper, Cm 6841. DWP.Google Scholar
DWP. (2006c), Security in retirement: towards a new pensions system. Summary of responses to the consultation. London: DWP.Google Scholar
DWP. (2007), Personal Accounts: a new way to save. Summary of responses to the consultation. London: DWP.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B. (2011a), The role of trade unions in European pension reforms: From ‘old’ to ‘new’ politics? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 17 (4), 315–331.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B. (Ed.) (2011b), Varieties of Pension Governance: Pension Privatization in Europe. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (Eds.). (2012), The Age of Dualization: the Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, C. (2006), Denmark: A ‘World Bank’ Pension System. In Immergut, E. M., Anderson, K. M. & Schulze, I. (Eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford OUP.Google Scholar
Guha, K. (2002, 17 Dec.), Strike threat by unions in battle over pensions. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2303013515&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Hacker, J. S. (2002), The divided welfare state: The battle over public and private social benefits in the United States. New York: CUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (Eds.) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halligan, L. and Martinson, J. (1998, 10 June), Union to offer own ‘stakeholder’ pension. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2302371327&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Harrison, D. (1992), What Will Labour Do with Serps? Financial Times. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2304600600&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Häusermann, S. (2010), Modernisation in Hard Times: The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe. New York: CUP.Google Scholar
Immergut, E. M., Anderson, K. M. and Schulze, I. (Eds.). (2006), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, L. (2003), Quantitative Indicators of Corporatism. International Journal of Sociology, 33 (3), 10–44.Google Scholar
Keune, M. (2017), Trade unions and the occupational pensions alternative: opportunity or threat? OSE Paper Series (Vol. 34). Brussels: European Social Observatory.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (2006), Power Resources and Employer-Centred Approaches in Explanations of Welfare States and Varieties of Capitalism. World Politics, 58 (2), 167–206.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (1998), The Paradox of Distribution and Strategies of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries. American Sociological Review, 63 (5), 661–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labour Party. (1957), National Superanuation: Labour's Policy for Social Security in Old Age. London: Labour Party.Google Scholar
Labour Party. (1985), Report of the Annual Conference of the Labour Party. London: Labour Party.Google Scholar
Labour Party. (1996), The Labour Party Conference Verbatim report. London: Labour Party.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, M. (2012), The Historical Roots of a Diffusion Process: The Three-Pillar Doctrine and European Pension Debates 1972–1994. Global Social Policy, 12 (1), 24–44.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (2012), Patterns of Democracy. Government and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (Second ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ludlam, S. and Taylor, A. (2003), The Political Representation of the Labour Interest in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41 (4), 727–749.Google Scholar
Mabbett, D. (2011), Regulatory failure in private pensions: Identifying the risks in the UK and Germany. In Leisering, L. (Ed.), The new regulatory state. Regulating private pensions in Germany and the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Mares, I. (2001), Firms and the Welfare State: When, Why, and How does Social Policy Matter to Employers? In P. Hall, A. & Soskice, D. (Eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. (2006), The Rationale for Occupational Pensions. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22 (1), 57–64.Google Scholar
Meyer, T. and Bridgen, P. (2012), Business, regulation and welfare politics in liberal capitalism. Policy and Politics, 40 (3), 387–403.Google Scholar
Myles, J. and Pierson, P. (2001), The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform. In Pierson, P. (Ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Naczyk, M. (2013), Agents of Privatization? Business Groups and the Rise of Pension Funds in Continental Europe. Socio-Economic Review, 11 (3), 441–469.Google Scholar
Naczyk, M. and Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2015), Solidarity against All Odds: Trade Unions and the Privatization of Pensions in the Age of Dualization. Politics and Society, 43 (3), 361–384.Google Scholar
Nielsen, V. N. F. (1996), Danish Occupational Penisons in the 1980s. In Shalev, M. (Ed.), The Privatisation of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinaia and Japan. NY: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
OECD. (2011), Pensions at a Glance 2011: Retirement-Income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD. (2012), Coverage of Private Pension Systems: Evidence and Policy Options, in OECD Pensions Outlook 2012: OECD.Google Scholar
Oude-Nijhuis, D. (2009), Revisiting the role of labour: worker solidarity, employer opposition, and the development of Old-Age Penisions in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. World Politics, 61 (2), 296–392.Google Scholar
Overbye, E. (1997), Convergence Theory Reconsidered: The Politics of Pensions in Scandinavia and Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 32 (1), 7–28.Google Scholar
Pemberton, H. (2010), ‘What matters is what works’: Labour's journey from ‘national superannuation’ to ‘personal accounts’. British Politics, 5 (1), 41–64.Google Scholar
Pemberton, H. (2012), The failure of nationalization by attraction: Britain's cross-class alliance against earnings-related pension in the 1950s. Economic History Review, 65 (4), 1428–1449.Google Scholar
Pensions Commission. (2004), Challenges and Choices: The First Report of the Pensions Commission. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Pensions Commission. (2005), A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century: The Second Report of the Pensions Commission. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Piazza, J. (2001), De-Linking Labour: Labor Unions and Social Democratic Parties under Globalization. Party Politics, 7 (4), 413–435.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C. (2000), Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rueda, D. (2007), Social Democracy Inside Out. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sass, S. (1997), The Promise of Private Pensions: The First Hundred Years. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, C. Q. and Wagemann, C. (2012), Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schulze, I. and Moran, M. (2006), United Kingdom: partisan politics in an adversarial system. In Immergut, E. M., Anderson, K. M. & Schulze, I. (Eds.), The Handbook of West European Pension Politics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L. (2004), Summary Dataset, Welfare State Entitlements: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Eighteen Welfare States.Google Scholar
Seeleib-Kaiser, M., Saunders, A. M. and Naczyk, M. (2012), Shifting the Public-Private Mix. In Emmenegger, P., Hausermann, S., Palier, B. & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (Eds.), The Age of Dualization: The Changing face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Simoni, M. (2007), The renegotiated alliance between the left and organised labour in western europe. Doctoral Thesis submitted to the European Institute, LSE.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (2005), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Suzman, M. (1996, 15 May), Thinking the unthinkable takes a little longer. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2305160068&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1997, May 29), Unions' Bank Calls for Compulsory Pensions. Financial Times.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Larsen, P. (2004), The UK- A Test Case for the Liberal Welfare State? In Taylor-Gooby, P. (Ed.), New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurley, D. (2011), Standard Note: 04847. Pensions: Automatic enrolment and employer contributions.Google Scholar
Timmins, N. (1997, 10 Feb.), IoD makes plea for compulsory pensions saving. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2306199698&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Timmins, N. (2002, 6 Nov.), Employer pension compulsion may be ruled out. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2304105156&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Timmins, N. (2005, 12 Apr.), Labour fails to tackle compulsion in Pensions. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/ftha/infomark.do?&source=gale&prodId=FTHA&userGroupName=lse_ttda&tabID=T003&docPage=article&docId=HS2306448873&type=multipage&contentSet=LTO&version=1.0Google Scholar
Trampusch, C. (2009), Collective agreements on pensions as a source of solidarity. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 25 (2), 99–107.Google Scholar
TUC. (1985), TUC Annual Report. London: TUC.Google Scholar
TUC. (1986), TUC Annual Report. London: TUC.Google Scholar
TUC. (1998), TUC Response to the Green Paper: A new Contract for Welfare: Partnership in Pensions. London: TUC.Google Scholar
Wiss, T. (2015), From Welfare States to Welfare Sectors. Journal of European Social Policy, 25 (5), 489–504.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gelepithis supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Gelepithis supplementary material(File)
File 122.1 KB