Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-12T21:14:42.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Swapping Policies: Alternative Tax-Benefit Strategies to Support Children in Austria, Spain and the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2007

HORACIO LEVY ,
CHRISTINE LIETZ  and
HOLLY SUTHERLAND
HORACIO LEVY
Affiliation:
Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex email: hlevy@essex.ac.uk
CHRISTINE LIETZ
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna email: lietz@ihs.ac.at
HOLLY SUTHERLAND
Affiliation:
(Contact author) Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex CO4 3SQ email: hollys@essex.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three European countries with very different tax-benefit systems have recently substantially increased the level of support for children: Austria, Spain and the UK. Austria mainly makes use of universal benefits; Spain, tax concessions; and the UK means-tested benefits and tax credits. This article addresses the question of whether the chosen strategies are in fact the most effective for each country. It considers what would have happened if these countries had transformed the architecture of their systems in either of the other two directions. It makes use of EUROMOD, the European tax-benefit microsimulation model that is designed for making cross-country comparisons, to explore the distributional and, in particular, child poverty effects of budget-neutral alternatives. The results show that three factors – the level of spending, its structure, and the way it impacts in a particular national context – affect the outcomes to varying degrees.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 625 - 647
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, S. and Brewer, M. 2004, Supporting Families: The Financial Costs and Benefits of Children since 1975, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B. 1998, Poverty in Europe, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A. B, Bourguignon, F. and Chiappori, P. A. 1988, ‘What do we learn about tax reforms from international comparisons? France and Britain’, European Economic Review, 32: 343–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargain, O. and Orsini, K. 2006, ‘In-work policies in Europe: killing two birds with one stone?’, Labour Economics, 13: 1, 669–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J. and Finch, N. 2002, A Comparison of Child Benefit Packages in 22 Countries, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 174, London: CDS.Google Scholar
Corak, M. 2005, ‘Principles and practicalities in measuring child poverty for the rich countries’, Innocenti Working Paper No. 2005–01, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corak, M., Lietz, C. and Sutherland, H. 2005, ‘The impact of tax and transfer systems on children in the European Union’, Innocenti Working Paper No. 2005–04, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Work and Pensions 2005, Opportunity for All – Seventh Annual Report, Cm 6673, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Eurostat 2005, European Social Statistics, Social Protection, Expenditure and Receipts, Luxembourg, European Communities.Google Scholar
Fuchs, M. and Lietz, C. 2007, ‘Effects of changes in tax-benefit policies in Austria 1998–2005’, EUROMOD Working Paper EM3/07, ISER, University of Essex, Colchester, forthcoming.Google Scholar
HM Treasury 2004, Budget 2004: Prudence for a Purpose: A Britain of Stability and Strength, HC 301, London: TSO.Google Scholar
Immervoll, H., O'Donoghue, C. and Sutherland, H. 1999, ‘An introduction to EUROMOD’, EUROMOD Working Paper EM0/99, ISER, University of Essex, Colchester.Google Scholar
De Lathouwer, L. 1996, ‘A case study of unemployment scheme for Belgium and the Netherlands’, in Harding, A. (ed.), Microsimulation and Public Policy, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Levy, H. 2003, ‘Child-targeted tax-benefit reform in Spain in a European context: a microsimulation analysis using EUROMOD’, EUROMOD Working Paper No. EM2/03, ISER, University of Essex, Colchester.Google Scholar
Levy, H., Lietz, C. and Sutherland, H. 2005, ‘Alternative tax-benefit strategies to support children in the European Union: recent reforms in Austria, Spain and the United Kingdom’, Innocenti Working Paper No. 2005–07, Florence, UNICEF Innocenti Research CentreGoogle Scholar
Piachaud, D. and Sutherland, H. 2001, ‘Child poverty in Britain and the New Labour government’, Journal of Social Policy, 30: 1, 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, H. 2001, ‘EUROMOD: an integrated European benefit-tax model, final report’, EUROMOD Working Paper EM9/01, ISER, University of Essex, Colchester.Google Scholar
UNICEF 2005, Child Poverty in Rich Countries, 2005, Innocenti Report Card No. 6. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar