Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T21:27:49.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Social Services Committee: a forum for policy review and policy reform*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Jaqi Nixon  and
Nigel Nixon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 1979 the House of Commons Select Committee system was reformed with a view to strengthening the powers of the Legislature over the Executive. The Social Services Committee is one of fourteen new Select Committees and has the responsibility to scrutinize the performance of the DHSS, to evaluate policies which are relevant to the Department and to publish the results of its investigatory enquiries. Thus, by reviewing policies and by making recommendations for reform, the Social Services Committee has the potential to play a significant role in the development of existing policies as well as in determining the shape of future ones. This article begins by providing a brief account of the reformed Select Committee structure in order to set in context the functions and performance of the Social Services Committee. It then examines the role and contributions of members, the chairman and the specialist advisers before proceeding to look at some of the Committee's activities. The article concludes by considering the impact of the Social Services Committee upon current DHSS policies and assessing its contribution to the wider policy making environment.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , July 1983 , pp. 331 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

BBC (1980), Politics without Power, Transcript of Analysis, presented by Hetherington, A., Radio 4, 13 08.Google Scholar
Beloff, M. (1983), ‘Assets you won't find in the books’, The Times, 24 01.Google Scholar
Davies, A. (1980), Reformed Select Committees: the First Year, Outer Circle Policy Unit, London.Google Scholar
Donnison, D. (1980), in Bulmer, M. (ed.), Social Research and Royal Commissions, George Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Cann, E. Du (1981), ‘Parliament, Select Committees and Democracy’, Public Money, 06, pp. 25–8.Google Scholar
Himeltarb, S. (1980), ‘Consensus in Committee: the case of the Select Committee on Race Relations and Immigration’, Parliamentary Affairs, 33: No. 1, Winter, pp. 54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Commons (1979), First Report from the Select Committee on Procedure, HC 588, Session 1977–1978, HMSO. London.Google Scholar
House of Commons (1980a), Fact Sheet No. 6: The New Departmental Select Committee Structure, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
House of Commons (1980b), Perinatal and Neonatal Mortality, Second Report of the Social Services Committee, HC 663, Session 1979–1980, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
House of Commons (1980c), The Government's White Papers on Public Expenditure. The Social Services, Third Report of the Social Services Committee, HC 702, Session 1979–1980, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
House of Commons (1981a), Public Expenditure on the Social Services, Third Report of the Social Services Committee, HC 324 i and ii, Session 1980–1981, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
House of Commons (1981b), Medical Education – with special reference to the number of doctors and the career structure in hospitals, Fourth Report of the Social Services Committee, HC 31, Session 1980–1981, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
House of Commons (1982a), UGC Cuts and Medical Services, First Report of the Social Services Committee, HC 191, Session 1981–1982, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
House of Commons (1982b), Age of Retirement, Third Report of the Social Services Committee, HC 26, Session 1981–1982, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Jewell, M. E. and Patterson, S. C. (1977), The Legislative Process in the United States, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. (1966), Parliament and Administration: The Estimates Committee 1945–65, George Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. (1981), ‘Select Committees as Tools of Parliamentary Reform: some further reflections’, in Walkland, S. A. and Ryle, M. (eds), The Commons Today, Fontana, Glasgow, pp. 203–36.Google Scholar
Jones, B. and Wilford, R. (1980), A Preliminary Research Report on the Welsh Affairs Select Committee, Paper presented to Political Studies Association, UK, Politics Workshop, Cardiff, 09.Google Scholar
King, A. (ed.) (1978), The New American Political System, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Market and Opinion Research International Ltd. (MORI) (1981), Attitudes of Members of Parliament towards Select Committees, Extracts from 1981 Survey of 100 MPs, London.Google Scholar
Nixon, N. J. (1982), The Reformed Select Committee Structure, with particular reference to the workings of the Education, Science and Arts Committee and the part played by specialist advisers, University of London, Institute of Education, 06.Google Scholar
Patterson, S. C. (1978), ‘The Semi-Sovereign Congress’ in King, A. (ed.) The New American Political System, pp. 125–77.Google Scholar
Plowden, W. (1981), The Guardian, 20 07.Google Scholar
Robinson, A. (1978), Parliament and Public Spending, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
Stevas, N. St. John (1979), House of Commons Debates, Vol. 969, C44, 25 06.Google Scholar
Stevas, N. St. John (1980), Inside Parliament, 4 05.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. (1981), ‘The New Watchdogs of Parliament’, New Society, 16 01.Google Scholar