Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:22:06.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking Child Policy Post-UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: Vulnerable Children's Welfare in Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2015

MARIA HEIMER  and
JOAKIM PALME
MARIA HEIMER
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Uppsala University, Box 514, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden email: maria.heimer@statsvet.uu.se
JOAKIM PALME
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Uppsala University, Box 514, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden email: joakim.palme@statsvet.uu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) formulates the rights of children in terms of provision, protection and participation. CRC implies a multi-dimensional view of children's welfare, including agency. This enables us to rethink the way we research and design policies aimed at promoting child welfare. In the past, Sweden has been seen as a forerunner when it comes to children's rights. However, the weak imprint of CRC on Swedish legislation and CRC implementation is not only a puzzle but also this apparent lack of impact makes it an interesting test case for exploring post-CRC policy developments. The purpose of the study is to identify what has prevented the evolution of Swedish social policy in this domain. We propose a framework for analysing policies aimed at promoting children's welfare (child policy) that goes beyond ‘family policy’. This, we argue, is critical for identifying obstacles to such a policy evolution. The framework is normatively anchored in CRC and theoretically inspired by the notion of participatory rights. By examining the legal reform work in Sweden over the past three decades with regard to how children's right to voice is treated in three areas of social service delivery, we observe that the lawmaker recognises parents’ rather than children's participatory rights. The lack of recognition of children's agency implies that a reconceptualisation of child welfare is necessary in order to unlock the stalemate in child policy development in Sweden, as well as to dissolve the tension between children as ‘beings’ and ‘becomings’.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 435 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alanen, L. (2007), ‘Theorizing Children's Welfare’ in Wintersberger, H., Alanen, L., Olk, T. and Qvortrup, J. (eds.) Childhood, Generational Order and the Welfare State, Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark, 27–44.Google Scholar
Alderson, P. (2007), ’Competent children? Minors’ consent to health care treatment and research’, Social Science & Medicine, 65, 2272–2283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneil, B. (2002), ’Becoming versus Being: A critical analysis of the child in liberal theory’ in Archard, D. and Macleod, C. (eds.), The Moral and Political Status of Children, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 70–94.Google Scholar
Badham, B. (2004), ’Participation – for a change: Disabled young people lead the way’, Children & Society, 18, 143–154.Google Scholar
BO (Barnombudsmannen) (2012), ’Utsatta barn får ständigt sina rättigheter åsidosatta’, Stockholm: DN Debatt,120223.Google Scholar
Bartley, K. (1998), Barnpolitik och barnets rättigheter, Göteborg: Sociologiska institutionen.Google Scholar
Cocozza, M. and Hort, S. (2011), ‘The dark side of the universal welfare state? Child abuse and protection in Sweden’, in Gilbert, N., Parton, N. and Skivenes, M. (eds.), Child Protection Systems. International trends and orientations, New York: Oxford University Press, 89–111.Google Scholar
Durrant, J. E. and Olsen, G.M. (1997), ‘Parenting and public policy: contextualizing the Swedish corporal punishment ban’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 19:4, 443–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eekelar, J. (1994), ’The interests of the child and the child's wishes’, in Alston, P. (ed.), The Best Interests of the Child. Reconciling culture and human rights, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 42–61.Google Scholar
Eriksson, M. and Näsman, E. (2011), När barn som upplevt våld möter socialtjänsten – om barns perspektiv, delaktighet och giltiggörande, Stockholm: Gothia.Google Scholar
Erikson, R. and Tåhlin, M. (1987), ‘ Coexistence of welfare problems’ in Erikson, R. and Åberg, R. (eds.) Welfare in Transition: A Survey of Living Conditions in Sweden 1968–1981, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 257–80.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (2002), Why We Need a New Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fernqvist, S. (2011), ‘Redefining participation? On the positioning of children in Swedish welfare benefits appeals’, Childhood, 18:2, 227–241.Google Scholar
Franklin, B. (ed.) (2002), The New Handbook of Children's Rights. Comparative policy and practice, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (ed.) (1997), Combatting Child Abuse: International Perspectives and Trends, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, N., Parton, N. and Skivenes, M. (eds.) (2011), Child Protection Systems. International trends and orientations, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. (1998), The Third Way: A Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hansson, Karl. (2012), ‘Schools of thought in children's rights’, in Liebel, M., Children's Rights from Below. Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 63–79.Google Scholar
Hernes, H. M. (1988), ‘Scandinavian Citizenship’, Acta Sociologica, 31:3, 199–215.Google Scholar
Hernes, H. (1987), Welfare State and Woman Power. Essays in State Feminism, Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Höjer, I. and Röbäck, K. (2007), Barn i kläm – hur uppmärksammas barn i mål om verkställighet av umgänge, Stockholm: Stiftelsen Allmänna Barnhuset.Google Scholar
James, A. (2011), ’To Be(Come) or Not to Be(Come): Understanding Children's citizenship’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 633, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, S. (1970), Om levnadsnivåundersökningen, Utkast till Kapitel 1 och 2 o betänkande att avgivas av Låginkomstutredningen, Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget.Google Scholar
Kirby, P. (2002), Measuring the Magic? Evaluating and Researching Young People's Participation in Public Decision Making, London: Carnegie Young People Initiative.Google Scholar
Korpi, W. (2000), ‘Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class and Patterns of Inequality in Different Types of Welfare State’, Social Politics 7:2, 127–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (2006), ‘Children (but not women) first: New Labour, child welfare and gender’, Critical Social Policy, 26:2, 315–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, R. (2007a), ‘Why citizenship: Where, when and how children?’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 8:2, 693–718.Google Scholar
Lister, R. (2007b), ‘From object to subject: including marginalised citizens in policy making’, Policy & Politics, 35:3, 437–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1950), Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, H. and Limb, M. (1998), ‘The Right to Say: The Development of Youth Councils/Forums within the UK’, Area, 30, 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattsson, T. (2002), Barnet och rättsprocessen. Rättsäkerhet, integritetsskydd och autonomi i samband med beslut om tvångsvård, Lund: Juristförlaget.Google Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B. and Palme, J. (eds.) (2012), Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, policies and challenges, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, M. and Salonen, T. (2011), ‘Child poverty and child rights meet active citizenship: A New Zealand and Sweden case study’, Childhood, 18:2, 211–226.Google Scholar
Olk, T. and Wintersberger, H. (2007), ‘Welfare States and Generational Order’ in Wintersberger, H., Alanen, L., Olk, T. and Qvortrup, J. (eds.), Childhood, Generational Order and the Welfare State. Exploring Children's Social and Economic Welfare, Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark, 59–92.Google Scholar
Palme, J., Bergmark, Å., Bäckman, O., Estrada, F., Fritzell, J., Lundberg, O., Sjöberg, O., Sommestad, L. and Szebehely, M. (2003), ’A Welfare Balance Sheet for the 1990s’, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Supplement 6, 31, 10–12.Google Scholar
Percy-Smith, B. and Thomas, N. (eds.) (2010), A Handbook of Children and Young People's Participation. Perspectives from theory and practice, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (2003), ‘Recognition and the struggle for political voice’ in Hobson, B. (ed.), Recognition Struggles and Social Movements. Contested identities, agency and power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 263–273.Google Scholar
Sanders, R. and Mace, S. (2006), ‘Agency policy and the participation of children and young people in the child protection process’, Child Abuse Review, 15, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secker, E. (2009), ‘Expanding the concept of participatory rights’, The International Journal of Human Rights, 13:5, 697–715.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1985), Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Sinclair, R. (2004), ‘Participation in practice: Making it meaningful, effective and sustainable’, Children & Society, 18, 106–118.Google Scholar
Thomas, N. (2007), ‘Towards a theory of children's participation’, International Journal of Children's Rights, 15, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tisdall, K. and Davis, J (2004), ‘Making a difference? Bringing children's and young people's views into policy-making’, Children & Society, 18, 131–142.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R.M. (1958), Essays on the Welfare State, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Tregeagle, S. and Mason, J. (2008), ‘Service user experience of participation in child welfare case management’, Child & Family Social Work, 13, 391–401.Google Scholar
Vis, S.A., Strandbu, A., Holtan, A. and Thomas, N. (2011), ‘Participation and health – a research review of child participation in planning and decision-making’, Child and Family Social Work, 16, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. (1999), ‘Good-enough Principles for Welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 28:4, 667–687.Google Scholar
Östberg, F. (2010), Bedömningar och beslut. Från anmälan till insats i den sociala barnavården, Stockholm: Institutionen för socialt arbete.Google Scholar

Primary sources

Commission of Inquiry (1978), SOU 1978:10 Barnets rätt 1 Om förbud mot aga, Delbetänkande av utredningen om barnens rätt, Stockholm: Gotab.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry (1979), SOU 1979:63 Barnets rätt 2 Om föräldraansvar m.m., Delbetänkande av utredningen om barnens rätt, Stockholm: Gotab.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry (1986), SOU 1986:20 Barns Behov och Föräldrars Rätt. Socialtjänstens arbete med utsatta familjer, Betänkande av socialberedningen, Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry (1987), SOU 1987:7 Barnets rätt 3 Om barn i vårdnadstvister – talerätt för barn m.m., Delbetänkande av utredningen om barnens rätt, Stockholm: Svenskt Tryck.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice report (1989), Ds 1989:52 Vårdnad och umgänge, Stockholm: Regeringskansliets offsettcentral.Google Scholar
Government Bill (1990), Regeringens proposition 1990/91:8 Vårdnad och umgänge, Stockholm: Norstedts Tryckeri.Google Scholar
Government Bill (1995), Regeringens proposition 1994/95:224 Barns rätt att komma till tals, Stockholm: Gotab.Google Scholar
Government Bill (1997), Regeringens proposition 1996/97:124 Ändring i socialtjänstlagen, Stockholm: Gotab.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry (2000), SOU 2000:77 Omhändertagen. Samhällets ansvar för utsatta barn och unga, Betänkande av LVU-utredningen, Stockholm: Norstedts Tryckeri.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice report (2002), Ds 2002:13 Utövande av barns rättigheter i familjerättsprocesser.Google Scholar
Government Bill (2003), Regeringens proposition 2002/03:53 Stärkt skydd för barn i utsatta situationer m.m., Stockholm: Elanders Gotab.Google Scholar
National Board of Health and Welfare report (2003), Barnperspektiv vid handläggning av ekonomiskt bistånd.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs report (2004), Ds 2004:41 Ekonomiskt utsatta barn, Stockholm: Elanders Gotab.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry (2005a), SOU 2005:81 Källan till en chans. Nationell handlingsplan för den sociala barn och ungdomsvården, Stockholm: Edita.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry (2005b), SOU 2005:88 Vräkning och hemlöshet – drabbar också barn, Utredningen om vräkning och hemlöshet bland barnfamiljer, Stockholm: Elanders Gotab.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs report (2006), S2006/5256/ST Barns rätt till information m.m.Google Scholar
Government Bill (2007), Regeringens proposition 2006/07:129 Utveckling av den sociala barn och ungdomsvården m.m., Vällingby: Elanders.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry (2007), SOU 2007:52 Beslutanderätt vid gemensam vårdnad m.m., Stockholm: Edita.Google Scholar
Commission of Inquiry (2009), SOU 2009:68 Lag om stöd och skydd för barn och unga (LBU), Betänkande av Barnskyddsutredningen, Stockholm: Edita.Google Scholar
Government Bill (2010), Regeringens proposition 2009/10:192 Umgängesstöd och socialtjänstens förutsättningar att tala med barn, Vällingby: Elanders.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health and Social Affairs report (2011), dnr S2010/4139/FST Varför vräks barn fortfarande?Google Scholar
Government Bill (2011), Regeringens proposition 2011/12:53 Barns möjligheter att få vård, Vällingby: Elanders.Google Scholar
Government Bill (2012), Regeringens proposition 2012/13:10 Stärkt stöd och skydd för barn och unga, Vällingby: Elanders.Google Scholar