Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:47:31.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficient Targeting of Community Care: The Case of the Home Help Service*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Andrew Bebbington  and
Bleddyn Davies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By 1985 community care, of which the home help service is one of the cornerstones, was on the brink of a major change which would fundamentally affect targeting. The new focus is a concentration on those in greatest need, responsiveness to the needs of carers, and to the potential for the self financing of care. The analysis given here indicates that huge changes in targeting of the service will have been needed from the situation in 1985 to meet these new policies, changes which might be expected to move the service away from its traditional role of monitoring the very old living alone. Analysis of the period between 1980 and 1985, using the General Household Survey, shows that the targeting effect of new policies is not easy to predict. The slight increase in home care during the period did not reflect an improvement in targeting on the demonstrably most needy, but instead apparently spread the service more widely. Re-examination of equity, territorial and gender issues shows that only limited progress had been made. Indeed, gender discrimination may even have increased.

While the UK may not wish to go as far as some other countries in allocating community care according to fixed eligibility criteria, come what may, targeting concepts will be increasingly salient for monitoring the community care policy's achievement.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , July 1993 , pp. 373 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arber, S., Gilbert, G. N. and Evandrou, M. (1988), ‘Gender, household composition and receipt of domiciliary services by the elderly disabled’, Journal of Social Policy, 17, 153–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audit Commission (1986), Making a Reality of Community Care, London, HMSO.Google Scholar
Bebbington, A. C. and Charnley, H. (1990), ‘Community care for the elderly: rhetoric and reality’, British Journal of Social Work, 20, 409–32.Google Scholar
Bebbington, A. C. and Davies, B. P. (1983), ‘Equity and efficiency in the allocation of personal social services’. Journal of Social Policy, 12, 309–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boulard report, Assemblée Nationale (1991), Rapport d'information déposé en application d l'article 145 du Reglement par la commission des affaires culturelles familiales et sociales sur les personnes agées dépendantes, La Documentation francaise, Paris.Google Scholar
Chombeau, C. (1992), ‘Le projet du governement sur les personnes agés dépendantes’, Le Monde, 22 12 1992.Google Scholar
Davies, B. P., Bebbington, A. C., Charnley, H. and colleagues (1990), Resources, Needs and Outcomes in Community Based Care, Avebury, Aldershot, UK.Google Scholar
Davies, B. P. (1992), ‘Resources, needs and outcomes in community care: why academic caution is practically useful’, forthcoming in Morgan, K. (ed.), Gerontology: Responding to an Aging Society, Jessica Kingsley, London.Google Scholar
Davies, B. P. and Baines, B. (1991), ‘Attitudes to residential care, and subsequent probability of admission’, PSSRU Discussion Paper 780, University of Kent, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Decker, (1982), ‘The nursing home system: a policy analysis’, The Gerontologist, 22:1, 39–44.Google Scholar
Department of Health (1990), Community Care in the Next Decade and Beyond: Policy Guidance, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Social Security Social Services Inspectorate (1987), From Home Help to Home Care, DHSS, London.Google Scholar
Department of Health Social Services Inspectorate (1991), The Long-Term Care Crisis: Elders Trapped in the No-Care Zone, SAGE Publications, California.Google Scholar
Evandrou, M., Falkingham, J., LeGrange, J. and Winter, D. (1990), ‘Equity in health and social care’, Welfare State Programme Discussion Paper 52, Suntory-Toyota International Centre for Economic and Related Disciplines, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Factor, H., Morgenstin, B. and Naon, D. (1991), ‘Home care services in Israel’, chapter 7 of Jamieson, A. (ed.), Home Care for Older People in Europe, Commission of European Communities Health Services Research Series no. 7. OUP, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fuller, M. and Bebbington, A. C. (1983), ‘Likelihood ratio tests for ratios in contingency tables’, PSSRU Discussion Paper 278, University of Kent, Canterbury.Google Scholar
Griffiths Report (1988), Community Care: Agenda for Action. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Holstein, B. E., Almind, G., Due, P. and Hoist, E. (1991), ‘The home-help service in Denmark’, chapter 3 of Jamieson, A. (ed.) Home Care for Older People in Europe, Commission of European Communities Health Services Research Series no. 7. OUP, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. E. and Burwell, B. O. (1989). Use of Functional Criterion Allocating Long-Term Care Benefits: What are the Policy Implications? Systemetrics, Lexington, Ma.Google Scholar
Kane, R. L., Saslow, M. G. and Brundage, T. (1991), ‘State approaches to functional assessments? for home care’, in Rowland, D. and Lyons, B. (eds.), Financing Home Care: Improving Protection for Disabled Elderly People, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Morginstin, B. and Shamai, N. (1988), ‘Issues in planning long-term care insurance in Israel's social security system’. Social Security: Journal of Welfare and Social Security Studies, 30 (English Edition).Google Scholar
Pepper Commission Report (1990), A Call for Action: Final Report of the US Bipartisan Commission on Comprehensive Health Care, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Schopflin Report (1991). Dépendance et solidarités mieux aider les personnes agées. Rapport de la Commission presidéd par Pierre Schoplin. Commissariat Genéral du Plan, Paris.Google Scholar
Spector, W. D. (1991), ‘Cognitive impairment and disruptive behaviours among community-based elderly persons: implications for targeting long-term care’, The Gerontologist, 31, 51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twigg, J. (1991), The Interweaving of Formal and Informal Care: Policy Models and Problems. Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York.Google Scholar
Westland, P. (1991), ‘Misguided rhetoric’, Social Work Today, 13, 01/02 1991, 13–15.Google Scholar
Wood, J. B. and Estes, C. L. (1988), ‘The medicalization of community services for the elderly’, Health and Social Work, 13, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed