Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T23:13:58.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developments in the Swedish Early Retirement Scheme: The Drive Against High Welfare Expenditure and Ill-health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2009

Bo Carlsson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The social insurance system has been an important element in the Swedish welfare model. However, in Sweden as in other Western countries there is an ongoing discussion about the rationality of the post-1940 welfare state. A social right or benefit constantly debated is the right to an early retirement pension. The value of such an early retirement pension has been questioned from economical as well as social or human points of view. The purpose of this article is to shed light on different processes behind the increasing number of early retirement pensioners and on the ongoing rehabilitation programmes in Sweden. A question that will arise: Is there a possible margin of gains from the interventions of the rehabilitation programme?

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 193 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berglind, H. (1977), ‘Fortidspension etter arbete?’ [Early retirement or work?], SOU, 88, liber, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Carlsson, B. (1989), ‘Helan och Halvan: Processer och foreställningar kring den ökade förtidspensioneringen’ [Processes and conceptions of the Increasing early retirement], Tidskrift för Rättssociologi, 6, 69–93.Google Scholar
Carlsson, B. (1992), ‘Kampen mot ohälsa’ [The struggle against Ill-health], Retfœrd: Nordisk Juridisk Tidskrift, 15:57, 52–65.Google Scholar
Carlsson, B. and Roslund, M. (1991), ‘Rehabilitera meral Men vem, varför och i vilken grad’ [Rehabilitate! But who, why and to what extent], Social Forskning, 4, 10–11.Google Scholar
Castles, F. (1978), The Social-Democratic Image of Society, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Eriksen, T. (1980), ‘Den shade sjukfraniaron – en statisk analys’ [The increased sick absence – a statistical analysis], Rapport 1, Delegationen för Social Forskning.Google Scholar
Eriksson, N. and Bäckström, I. (1989), Rehabiliteringsgrupper – till vilken nytta? [Rehabilitation groups – are they of any use?] Umeå Studies In Sociology, No. 97, Umeå, Department of Sociology, Umeå University.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985), Politics Against Markets, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Furåker, B. (1976), Stat och srbetsmarknadspolitik [The state and labour market policy], Arkiv, Lund.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1976), Legitimation Crisis, Helnemann, London.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol II, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hedström, P. (1980), Förtidspension – välfärd eller ofärd? [Early retirement – welfare or poverty?], Institutet för Social Forskning.Google Scholar
Hetzler, A. (1991), Den ersatta sjukfrdnvaron [The paid sick-absence], Bokbox förlag, Lund.Google Scholar
Hetzler, A. and Eriksson, K. R. (1981), Den ökade förtidspensioneringen [The Increasing early retirement], Bokbox förlag, Lund.Google Scholar
Klevmarken, A. (1990), ‘Välfärden och samhällsekonomin – om samhällsekonomlska styreffekter’ [Welfare and economy – The effects of political-economic steerage], Delegationen för Social Forskning, RapportGoogle Scholar
Korpl, W. (1983), The Democratic Class Struggle, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Leymann, H. (1988), Ingen annan utväg [No other solution]. Wahlström & Widstrand, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, R. (1992a), ‘Arbete, sjukdom och rehabilitering’ [Work, Illness and rehabilitation] pp. 15–32 in Marklund, S. (ed.) Rehabilitering I ett samhälleligt Perspektlv [Rehabilitation In the perspective of society], Studentlitteratur, Lund.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, R. (1992b), ‘Rehabiliteringens aktörer’ [The actors of rehabilitation], pp. 145–64 In Marklund, S. (ed.) Rehabilitering I ett samhälleligt perspektiv [Rehabilitation in the perspective of society], Studentlitteratur, Lund.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, R. and Marklund, S. (1992), ‘Arbetsllnjen I socialpolitlken’ [Work ethics In social policy], pp. 33–50 In Marklund, S. (ed.) Rehabilitering I ett samhälleligt perspektiv [Rehabilitation in the perspective of society], Studentlitteratur, Lund.Google Scholar
Marklund, S. (1982), Klass, stat och socialpolitik [Class, state and social policy], Arkiv, Lund.Google Scholar
Marklund, S. (1988), Paradise Lost? Arkiv, Lund.Google Scholar
Marklund, S. (1992), ‘The decomposition of social policy in Sweden’, Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 1, 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, R. (1990), The Welfare State in Capitalist Society, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1984), Contradiction of the Welfare State, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Olsson, S. E. (1990), Social Policy and Welfare State in Sweden, Swedish Institute for Social Research no. 13.Google Scholar
Olsson-Frick, H. (1977), Förtidspensionärernas situation [The social situation for persons granted early retirement], SOU, 88, Liber, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Riksförsäkringsverket [National Insurance Board] (1990), RFV Redovisar, 1990:2, Rehabilitering i utveckling [Rehabilitation in progress], Riksförsäkringsverket, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (1986), ‘After legal instrumentalism?’, pp. 299–325 in Teubner, G. (ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Therborn, G. (1991), ‘Sweden’, pp. 229–69 in Pfaller, A., Gough, I. and Therborn, G. (eds.) Can the Welfare State Compete? A Comparative Study of Five Advanced Capitalist Countries, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar