Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-07T22:59:01.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cutback Contradictions in Dutch Housing Policy*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Rob Flynn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes housing policy in the Netherlands and the current crisis over subsidies. It argues that the development of the welfare state, the housing system, and recent retrenchment contain contradictions which reflect the distinctive nature of Dutch politics and social structure. In particular, it suggests that the existence of pillarized social cleavages has been influential in the growth of a progressive welfare state, in providing a secure base for social rented housing, and in sustaining high levels of support for spending on housing subsidies. Expenditure cutbacks and measures for administrative rationalization are outlined, and some of the contradictory effects on housing policy are examined.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , April 1986 , pp. 223 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderiesen, G. (1981), ‘Tanks in the streets: The growing conflict over housing in Amsterdam’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 5:1, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakvis, H. (1984), ‘Toward a political economy of consociationalism’, Comparative Politics, 16:3, 315–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenton, M. (1982), ‘Changing relationships in Dutch social services’, Journal of Social Policy. 11:1, 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, C.G.A. (1981), ‘Depillarization in the Netherlands’, The British Journal of Sociology. 32:1, 56–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnison, D. and Ungerson, C. (1982), Housing Policy, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Draaisma, J. and van Hoogstraten, P. (1983), ‘The squatter movement in Amsterdam’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 7:3, 406–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleurke, F., van Harten, H., Hulst, R., Paardekooper, J. and de Vries, P. (1984), Planning en Decentralisatie van de Volkshuisvesting, Analyse-Rapport, Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, s'gravenhage.Google Scholar
Flynn, R. (1985), The Mediation of Bureaucratic-Professional Influence: Decentralization in Dutch Housing Policy, Paper presented to the Political Studies Association Annual Conference, University of Manchester, April.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrichhauzen, L. (1985), Woningcorporaties: Bouw en beheer in gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid, Van Loghum Slaterus, Deventer.Google Scholar
Gerrichhauzen, L. and van Giessen, M. (1983), ‘Bureau-politieke weerstanden rond decentralisatie’, Stedebouw en Volkshuisvesting, 64:11, 583–8.Google Scholar
Gerrichhauzen, L. and van Giessen, M. (1984a), ‘Decentralisatie van het volkshuisvestingbeleid: een eenzijdig beeld’, Stedebouw en Volkshuisvesting, 65:1, 35–8.Google Scholar
Gerrichhauzen, L. and van Giessen, M. (1984b), ‘Decentralisatie van het Volkshuisvestingbeleid: een tussenbalans’, Stedebouw en Volkshuisvesting, 65:2, 78–82.Google Scholar
Gerrichhauzen, L. and van Giessen, M. (1984c), ‘Woningcorporaties, decentralisatie en de echte crises’, Stedebouw en Volkshuisvesting, 65:7–8, 318–22.Google Scholar
Goudsblom, J. (1967), Dutch Society, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Gough, I. (1982), ‘The crisis of the British welfare state’, in Fainstein, N.I. and Fainstein, S.S. (eds), Urban Policy under Capitalism, Vol. 22, Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, Sage, London, pp. 43–64.Google Scholar
Harloe, M. (1985), Private Rented Housing in the United States and Europe, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
Harloe, M. and Martens, M. (1984), ‘Comparative housing research’, Journal of Social Policy, 13:3, 255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harloe, M. and Martens, M. (1985), The Restructuring of Housing Provision in Britain and the Netherlands, Institute for Urban Studies, Department of Sociology, University of Essex.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidenheimer, A.J., Heclo, H. and Adams, C.T. (1983), Comparative Public Policy (2nd edition), Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. (1981), States of Welfare, Basil Blackwell and Martin Robertson, Oxford.Google Scholar
Idenburg, P.A. (1985), ‘The Dutch paradox in social welfare’, in Jones, C. and Brenton, M. (eds), The Yearbook of Social Policy in Britain 1984–85, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp.123–43.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1975), The Politics of Accommodation (2nd edition), University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies, Yale University Press, New Haven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Housing and Physical Planning (1983), Some Data on Housebuilding in the Netherlands, The Hague.Google Scholar
MVRO (1982), Onderzoekplan Volkshuisvesting, s'gravenhage.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1984), Contradictions of the Welfare State, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Pickvance, C.G. (1986), ‘Comparative urban analysis’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 10:2 (06).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priemus, H. (1981), ‘Rent and subsidy policy in the Netherlands during the Seventies’, Urban law and Policy, 4, 299–355.Google Scholar
Priemus, H. (ed.)(1983), Who Will Pay the Housing Bill in the Eighties?, Delft University Press, Delft.Google Scholar
Priemus, H. (1984), Housing Allowances in the Netherlands, Delft University Press, Delft.Google Scholar
Sociaal en Cultureel Rapport (1984). Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Rijswijk.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Dale, J. (1981), Social Theory and Social Welfare, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Kamer, Tweede (1980–1981). 16625 Heroverwegingen, Staatsuitgeverij, s'gravenhage.Google Scholar
Kamer, Tweede (1984–1985), 18615 Meerjarenplan Woningbouw 1985–1989 Staatsuitgeverij, s'gravenhage.Google Scholar
van der Linden, J.T.J.M. (1985), Economische Ontwikkeling en de rol van de overheid, Kobra, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
van der Schaar, J. (1983), ‘Housing costs in the Netherlands: Trends in the period 1950–1980 and the distribution of housing costs in 1977’, in Priemus (1983), pp.29–49.Google Scholar
van Fulpen, H. (1982), Maatschappelijke aspecten van de financiering van de volkshuisvesting, SCP Cahier 29, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Rijswijk.Google Scholar
van Fulpen, H. (1983), ‘The distribution of housing subsidies over income groups, empirical and normative’, in Priemus (1983), pp.5–28.Google Scholar
van Fulpen, H. (1984), Woonuitgaven 1980–2000: Een analyse van mogelijke ontwikkelingen SCP Cahier 40, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Rijswijk.Google Scholar
van Schendelen, M.C.P.M. (1984), ‘The views of Arend Lijphart and collected criticisms’. Acta Politica, 29:1, 19–55.Google Scholar
van Weesep, J. (1984), ‘Intervention in the Netherlands: Urban housing policy and market response’, Urban Affairs Quarterly, 19:3, 329–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Wijk, F. (1984), Budgetstekel en Decentralisatie van de Volkshuisvesting, RIGO Rapport, Ministerie van Volk shuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieu beheer, s'gravenhage.Google Scholar
van't Eind, G. J., van Fulpen, H., Pommer, E. and Ruitenberg, L. (1983), Profijtbeleid van de Overheid, Sociaal en Cultereel Planbureau, Rijswijk.Google Scholar
Venema, F. and Verbaan, C. W. (1984), ‘Ombuigingen bij WVC en VROM’, Beleid en Maatschappij, 11:5, 138–42 (translation by C. Odijk).Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. L. (1981), ‘Leftism, Catholicism and Democratic Corporatism: The role of political parties in recent welfare state development’, in Flora, P. and Heidenheimer, A.J. (eds), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, Transaction Books, New Brunswick and London, pp.345–82.Google Scholar