Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Capturing Diversity: A Typology of Third Sector Organisations’ Responses to Contracting Based on Empirical Evidence from Homelessness Services

  • HEATHER BUCKINGHAM (a1)

Abstract

The impacts of government contracting on third sector organisations (TSOs) have attracted much discussion; however, the diversity of the organisations that comprise the third sector means that these impacts in fact vary considerably between TSOs. In order to better understand this complexity and to analyse and articulate TSOs’ experiences more effectively, it is useful to think about different response types. Based on empirical evidence from a study of homelessness TSOs in two South East England local authorities, this paper presents a typology of organisational responses to contracting. The four types identified are: Comfortable Contractors, Compliant Contractors, Cautious Contractors, and Community-Based Non-Contractors. The varied experiences of these different types of organisation with regard to contracting are described in the paper and point to the need for greater precision and differentiation within academic debates, and in the formulation of social policy relating to the third sector.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Alcock, P. and Scott, D. (2007), ‘Voluntary and community sector welfare’, in Powell, M. (ed.), Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press.
Billis, D. (2010), ‘From welfare bureaucracies to welfare hybrids’, in Billis, D. (ed.), Hybrid Organisations and the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bode, I. (2006), ‘Disorganised welfare mixes: voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16: 4, 346–59.
Buckingham, H. (2009), ‘Competition and contracts in the voluntary sector: exploring the implications for homelessness service providers in Southampton’, Policy and Politics, 37: 2, 235–54.
Buckingham, H. (2011), ‘Hybridity, diversity and the division of labour in the third sector: what can we learn from homelessness organisations in the UK?’, Voluntary Sector Review, 2: 2, 157–75.
Butler, P. (2011), ‘Charity cuts: the “avoidable destruction” of homelessness services’, The Guardian, 15 July.
Braithwaite, C. (1938), The Voluntary Citizen: An Enquiry into the Place of Philanthropy in the Community, London: Methuen.
Chew, C. and Osborne, S. P. (2009), ‘Exploring strategic positioning in the UK charitable sector: emerging evidence from charitable organisations that provide public services’, British Journal of Management, 20: 90105.
Cloke, P., Johnsen, S. and May, J. (2005), ‘Exploring ethos? Discourses of “charity” in the provision of emergency services for homeless people’, Environment and Planning A, 37: 3, 385402.
Cloke, P., Johnsen, S. and May, J. (2007), ‘Ethical citizenship? Volunteers and the ethics of providing services for homeless people’, Geoforum, 38: 6, 1089–101.
Cloutier-Fisher, D. and Skinner, M. W. (2006), ‘Levelling the playing field? Exploring the implications of managed competition for voluntary sector providers of long-term care in small town Ontario’, Health and Place, 12: 1, 97109.
Conradson, D. (2002), ‘Negotiating value-based tension: voluntary welfare provision in Christchurch, New Zealand: Summary research findings’, http://www.geog.soton.ac.uk/school/staff/profiles/djc/VWP.pdf.
Crang, M. (2005), ‘Analysing qualitative materials’, in Flowerdew, R. and Martin, D. (eds.), Methods in Human Geography, Harlow: Pearson Education.
Cunningham, I. and Nickson, D. (2009), ‘A gathering storm? Procurement, re-tendering and the voluntary sector social care workforce’, http://www.strath.ac.uk/media/departments/hrm/pdfs/hrm-pdf-scer/SCER.pdf.
Ebaugh, H. R., Chafetz, J. S. and Pipes, P. (2005), ‘Funding good works: funding sources of faith-based social service coalitions’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34: 4, 448–72.
European Parliament (2004), Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the Coordination of Procedures for the Award of Public Works Contracts, Public Supply Contracts and Public Service Contracts, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:134:0114:0240:EN:PDF.
Evers, A. (1995), ‘Part of the welfare mix: the third sector as an intermediate area’, Voluntas, 6: 2, 159–82.
Evers, A. (2005), ‘Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: changes in the governance and provision of social services’, International Journal of Public Administration, 28: 9, 737–48.
Fear, H. and Barnett, P. (2003), ‘Holding fast: the experience of collaboration in a competitive environment’, Health Promotion International, 18: 1, 514.
Fyfe, N. R. and Milligan, C. (2003), ‘Space, citizenship, and voluntarism: critical reflections on the voluntary welfare sector in Glasgow’, Environment and Planning A, 35: 11, 2069–86.
Hampshire Supporting People (2006), Strategic Review of Homelessness Services, 2005–06: County Implementation Plan, http://www3.hants.gov.uk/strat-review_homeless-cip-05-7.doc.
Harris, M., Halfpenny, P. and Rochester, C. (2003), ‘A social policy role for faith-based organisations? Lessons from the UK Jewish voluntary sector’, Journal of Social Policy, 32: 93112.
Haugh, H. and Kitson, M. (2007), ‘The Third Way and the third sector: New Labour's economic policy and the social economy’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31: 6, 973–94.
Johnsen, S., Cloke, P. and May, J. (2005), ‘Day centres for homeless people: spaces of care or fear?’, Social and Cultural Geography, 6: 6, 787811.
Kendall, J. (2003), The Voluntary Sector, London: Routledge.
Knight, B. (1993), Voluntary Action, 2nd edition, London: Centris.
Lake, R. W. and Newman, K. (2002), ‘Differential citizenship in the shadow state’, Geo Journal, 58: 109120.
Larner, W. and Butler, M. (2005), ‘Governmentalities of local partnerships: the rise of a “partnering state” in New Zealand’, Studies in Political Economy, 75: 85108.
Ling, T. (2000), ‘Unpacking partnership: the case of healthcare’, in Clarke, D., Gerwirtz, S. and McLaughlin, E. (eds.), New Managerialism, New Welfare?, London: Sage.
May, J., Cloke, P. and Johnsen, S. (2005), ‘Re-phasing neoliberalism: New Labour and Britain's crisis of street homelessness’, Antipode, 37: 4, 703–30.
McLaughlin, K. (2004), ‘Towards a modernized voluntary and community sector?’, Public Management Review, 6: 4, 555–62.
Milbourne, L. (2009), ‘Remodelling the third sector: advancing collaboration or competition in community-based initiatives’, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 2, 277–97.
Milligan, C. (2007), ‘Geographies of voluntarism: mapping the terrain’, Geography Compass, 1: 2, 183–99.
Milligan, C. and Fyfe, N. R. (2004), ‘Putting the voluntary sector in its place: geographical perspectives on voluntary activity and social welfare in Glasgow’, Journal of Social Policy, 33: 7393.
Milligan, C. and Fyfe, N. R. (2005), ‘Preserving space for volunteers: exploring the links between voluntary welfare organisations, volunteering and citizenship’, Urban Studies, 42: 3, 417–33.
Morris, D. (2000), ‘Charities in the contract culture: survival of the largest?’, Legal Studies, 20: 3, 409–27.
Mullins, D. and Murie, A. (2006), Housing Policy in the UK, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Najam, A. (2000), ‘The four-Cs of third sector-government relations: cooperation, confrontation, complementarity, and co-optation’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10: 4, 375–93.
Osborne, S. P. and McLaughlin, K. (2004), ‘The cross-cutting review of the voluntary sector: where next for local government–voluntary sector relationships?’, Regional Studies, 38: 5, 573–82.
Ramesh, R. (2011), ‘Charities fight for survival as funds slashed’, The Guardian, 2 August.
Riseborough, M. (2006), ‘Housing, social care and supporting people’, in Mullins, D. and Murie, A. (eds.) Housing Policy in the UK, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Southampton Supporting People (2005), Supporting People in Southampton: Five Year Strategy 2005–2010 (Final Draft), http://www.spkweb.org.uk/Your_local_area/GOSE/Southampton/Strategy_and_policies/5+Year+Strategy+-+Final+Draft.htm.
Stewart, H. (2011), ‘Work programme leaves charities fearful for their future’, The Observer, 11 September.
Young, D. R. (2000), ‘Alternative models of government–nonprofit sector relations: theoretical and international perspectives’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29: 1, 149–72.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed