Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:42:04.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Satire's Censorial Waters in Horace and Juvenal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2018

Kirk Freudenburg
Kirk Freudenburg*
Affiliation:
Yale University
*
kirk.freudenburg@yale.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper concerns the water imagery of two iconic passages of Roman satire: Horace's figuration of Lucilius as a river churning with mud at Sat. 1.4.11, and the transformation of that image at Juvenal, Sat. 3.62–8 (the Orontes flowing into the Tiber). It posits new ways of reckoning with the codifications and further potentials of these images by establishing points of contact with the workings of water in the Roman world. The main point of reference will be to the work of Rome's censors, who were charged not only with protecting the moral health of the state, but with ensuring the purity and abundance of the city's water supply as well.

Keywords

satirewater imagerycensorHoraceJuvenalCallimachusStatius
Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Roman Studies , Volume 108 , November 2018 , pp. 141 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Astin, A. E. 1988: ‘Regimen morum’, Journal of Roman Studies 78, 14–34.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2009: ‘Roman perspectives on the Greeks’, in Graziosi, B., Vasunia, P. and Boys-Stones, G. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies, Oxford, 98–113.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. 1983: Lawyers in Roman Republican Politics: a Study of the Roman Jurists in their Political Setting, 316–82 B.C., Münchener Beiträge zur Papyrusforschung und antiken Rechtsgeschichte 75, Munich.Google Scholar
Bramble, J. 1974: Persius and the Programmatic Satire: a Study in Form and Imagery, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Braund, S. 1996: Juvenal Satires Book I, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bruun, C. 2013: ‘Water supply, drainage and watermills’, in Erdkamp, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rome, Cambridge, 297–314.Google Scholar
Cichorius, C. 1908: Untersuchungen zu Lucilius, Berlin.Google Scholar
Coulson, J. C., and Dodge, H. 2000: Ancient Rome: the Archaeology of the Eternal City, Oxford.Google Scholar
Davies, P. 2012: ‘Pollution, propriety and urbanism in republican Rome’, in Bradley, M. (ed.), Rome, Pollution and Propriety: Dirt, Disease and Hygiene in the Eternal City from Antiquity to Modernity, Cambridge, 67–80.Google Scholar
Dodge, H. 2000: ‘“Greater than the pyramids”: the water supply of ancient Rome’, in Coulson and Dodge 2000, 166–209.Google Scholar
Evans, H. 1982: ‘Agrippa's water plan’, American Journal of Archaeology 86, 401–11.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 1993: The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire, Princeton.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2001: Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2002: ‘Writing to/through Florus: sampling the addressee in Horace Epistles 2.2’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 47, 33–55.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2013: ‘The afterlife of Varro in Horace's Sermones: generic issues in Roman satire’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Harrison, S. J. and Frangoulidis, S. (eds), Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions and Transformations, Trends in Classics, Supplementary Volume 20, Berlin, 297–336.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2014: ‘Seneca's Apocolocyntosis: censors in the afterworld’, in Bartsch, S. and Schiesaro, A. (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Seneca, Cambridge, 93–105.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2018: ‘The po(e)ts and pens of Persius’ third satire’, in Behrendt, A., Finkmann, S., Fuchs, A. and Walter, A. (eds), Tradition und Beispiel, Berlin (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Gallia, A. 2016: ‘“Some of my best friends …” Reading prejudice in Juvenal's third satire’, Classical Journal 111.3, 319–46.Google Scholar
Geue, T. 2015: ‘The loser leaves (Rome's loss): Umbricius’ wishful exile in Juvenal, Satire 3’, Classical Quarterly 65.2, 773–87.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 1995: ‘The anatomy of Rome from Capitol to Cloaca’, Journal of Roman Studies 85, 23–32.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 2012: Horace; Satires, Book I, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Haß, K. 2007: Lucilius und der Beginn der Persönlichkeitsdichtung in Rom, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. 1987: ‘O Fons Bandusiae: blood and water in Horace, Odes 3.13’, in Whitby, Mary, Hardie, P. and Whitby, Michael (eds), Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, Bristol, 131–40.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 2001: ‘Cinna, Statius, and “immanent literary history” in the cultural economy’, in L'Histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine, Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique 47, Geneva, 221–57.Google Scholar
Jones, P. 2005: Reading Rivers in Roman Literature and Culture, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Koloski-Ostrow, A. 2015: The Archaeology of Sanitation in Roman Italy: Toilets, Sewers, and Water Systems, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Longfellow, B. 2011: Roman Imperialism and Civic Patronage: Form, Meaning and Ideology in Monumental Fountain Complexes, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Martelli, F. 2009: ‘Plumbing Helicon: poetic property and the material world of Statius’ Silvae’, Materiali e Discussioni per l'Analisi dei Testi Classici 62, 145–77.Google Scholar
Marx, F. 1904–5: C. Lucili Carminum Reliquiae, 2 vols, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Noy, D. 2000: Foreigners at Rome: Citizens and Strangers, London.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. 1996: ‘Rome and the management of water: environment, culture, and power’, in Shipley, G. and Salmon, J. (eds), Human Landscapes in Classical Antiquity: Environment and Culture, Leicester-Nottingham Studies in Ancient Society 6, London, 180–212.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1989: Horace Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (‘Ars Poetica’), Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smolenaars, J. 2006: ‘Ideology and poetics along the Via Domitiana: Statius Silvae 4.3’, in Nauta, R. R., van Dam, H. and Smolenaars, J. (eds), Flavian Poetry, Leiden and Boston, 223–44.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2010: Roman Landscape: Culture and Identity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Suolahti, J. 1963: The Roman Censors. A Study on Social Structure, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. 2016: Texts, Editors and Readers: Methods and Problems in Latin Textual Criticism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. 1997: ‘Torrent or trickle? The Aqua Alsietina, the Naumachia Augusti, and the Transtiberim’, American Journal of Archaeology 101, 465–92.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. 2000: Public Needs and Private Pleasures: Water Distribution, The Tiber River, and the Urban Development of Ancient Rome, Rome.Google Scholar
Tucci, P. L. 2006: ‘Ideology and technology in Rome's water supply: castella, the toponym AQVEDVCTIVM and supply to the Palatine and Caelian hills’, Journal of Roman Archaeology 19, 94–120.Google Scholar
Uden, J. 2015: The Invisible Satirist: Juvenal and Second-Century Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. 1995: ‘Running water and social status in North Africa’, in Horton, M. and Weidemann, T. (eds), North Africa from Antiquity to Islam, Bristol, 52–6.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. 2012: ‘Water, power and culture in the Roman and Byzantine worlds: an introduction’, in Water History 4.1, 1–9.Google Scholar
Worman, N. 2015: Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2009: Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature, Oxford.Google Scholar
Zanda, E. 2011: Fighting Hydra-like Luxury: Sumptuary Regulation in the Roman Republic, Bristol.Google Scholar