Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:51:32.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role development for therapy radiographers in breast planning: a case study and discussion of influencing factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

C. Welgemoed
C. Welgemoed*
Affiliation:
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK
*
Correspondence to: C. Welgemoed, Radiotherapy, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK. E-mail: camarie.welgemoed@ampimperial.nhs.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this case study is to discuss factors that have an influence on the process of role development in radiotherapy breast planning.

Key themes: This article describes the process of development as experienced by the author and discusses factors that hindered the process of role development. These factors include development of a career plan, professional issues, resources, organisational structures, support from consultants, managers, multi-disciplinary, and professional colleagues and peer resistance.

Conclusion: The author makes recommendations that may contribute to improving the role development strategy in the profession and aid successful implementation of advanced practitioner and consultant roles for those radiographers who aspire to the consultant radiographer role in future. The article concludes that there is a need to identify, standardise and coordinate role development for therapy radiographers nationally to increase the appointment of more consultant radiographers.

Keywords

Advancedconsultantnurse Consultantpractitioner
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 47 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Department of Health. The NHS Cancer Plan: a plan for investment: a plan for reform. London: Department of Health, 2000.Google Scholar
Royal College of Radiologists. Advice on delegation of tasks in departments of clinical radiology. London: Royal College of Radiologists, 1996.Google Scholar
Department of Health. AHP Bulletin, 2001. www.publications.doh.gov/ahpbulletin/ahpbulletinGoogle Scholar
Department of Health. Advance Letter PAM(PTA). London:Department of Health, 2001.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Meeting the Challenge: a strategy for the allied Health professions. London:Department of Health, 2000.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Radiography skills mix. A report on the four tier service delivery model. London:Department of Health, 2003.Google Scholar
Eddy, A.Advanced practice for therapy radiographers—a discussion paper. Radiography 2008;14:24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society of Radiographers. Interim guidance on implementing the society of radiographers career progression framework in radiography. London:Society of Radiographers, 2002.Google Scholar
General Medical Council.Good Medical Practice. London: General Medical Council, 1998.Google Scholar
Price, RC, Patterson, AM.Consultant practitioners in radiography—a discussion paper. Radiography 2002; 8:97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, M, Snaith, B.How to achieve consultant practitioner status: a discussion paper. Radiography 2007; 13:265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, S, Jones, M, Doyal, L, Vaughan, B.Exploring new roles in practice: final Report. Available online at URL: www.snm.shef.ac.uk/research/enrip.htm.Google Scholar
Society of Radiographers. A strategy for continuous professional development. London: Society of Radiographers, 2003.Google Scholar
College of Radiographers. Clinical career development in radiography—a position statement. London:College of Radiographers, 2001.Google Scholar
Kelly, J.Advanced practice in breast care: a case study approach. Synergy 2005;21–27.Google Scholar
Woods, L.Implementing advanced practice: identifying the factors that facilitate and inhibit the process. J Clin Nur 1998;7:265–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, RC, Le Masurier, SB. Longitudinal changes in extended roles in radiography: a new perspective. Radiography 2007;13:18–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Department of Health, NHS vacancy statistics and staff numbers—31 March 2003 On line version available at www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Pressreleases/DH_4047392Google Scholar
Grol, P, Grimshaw, J.From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation in patients' care. Lancet 2003;362:1225–1230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPherson, K, Kersten, P, George, S, Lattimer, V, Breton, E, Kaur, D, Frampton, G.A systematic review of evidence about extended roles for allied health professionals. J Health Serv Res Policy 2006;11:240–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slotman, BJ, Cottier, B, Bentzen, SM, Heeren, G, Lievens, J, van den Bogaert, W.Overview pf national guidelines for infrastructure and staffing of radiotherapy. ESTRO-QUARTS: Work package 1. Radiother Oncol 2005;75:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar