Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T22:05:56.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The identification of abnormalities on radiotherapy CT planning scans: a retrospective audit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2022

Josie Cameron*
Affiliation:
NHS Lothian, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Josie Cameron, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK. Email: josie.cameron@nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk

Abstract

Introduction:

Therapeutic radiographers are an essential part of a cancer patient’s journey and play a vital and changing role in the delivery of radiotherapy services. This retrospective audit highlights the number of incidental abnormalities found by a Breast Advanced Practitioner on radiotherapy computed tomography (CT) planning scans and their subsequent management.

Methods:

This retrospective audit investigated the incidental abnormalities found by the Breast Advanced Practitioner on routine CT planning scans for breast cancer patients 2016–2021. Any breast cancer patient found to have an abnormality had their planning scan uploaded to the national picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) system for radiology review. Further formal CT imaging was requested or direct referral to an appropriate multi-disciplinary team meeting.

Results:

Sixty-three significant abnormalities were found over the five-year period, of these thirty seven were malignant and the majority of these were lung lesions. Seven patients went on to have surgery alone, surgery plus chemoradiation or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for their newly diagnosed lung primaries. Five patients were found to have liver metastases that unfortunately changed their treatment plan to palliative.

Conclusion:

This retrospective audit has demonstrated that CT planning for radiotherapy offers an opportunity to identify malignant abnormalities at a potentially early stage, thereby improving prognosis and survival. Radiographers have a duty of care to appraise these CT scans to ensure any abnormalities can be addressed in a timely manner.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Society and College of Radiographers. Achieving World Class Cancer Outcomes: The Vision for Therapeutic Radiography 2016. https://www.sor.org/getmedia/ebcd1177-d5ee-4e1d-963f-b397b4dec6e9/the_vision_for_therapeutic_rad_pdf.pdf_2. (Accessed 5 October 2021)Google Scholar
Department of Health. Meeting the Challenge: A Strategy for the Allied Health Professions. 2000. London.Google Scholar
Society and College of Radiographers. A Strategy for the Education and Professional Development of Therapeutic Radiographers. 2000. London.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Radiography Skill Mix: A report on the four-tier service delivery model. 2003. London.Google Scholar
Society and College of Radiographers. Positioning Therapeutic Radiographers within Cancer Services: Delivering Patient-Centred Care. 2006. London.Google Scholar
Wang, R, Zhu, Y, Liu, X et al. The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with Stage IV breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2019; 1091. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6311-z CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Royal College of Radiologists. iRefer: Making the best use of clinical radiology, 7th Edition. London. The Royal College of Radiologists, 2012.Google Scholar
Cameron, J. Incidental finding of primary and metastatic lung cancers during radiographer-led virtual simulation for breast cancer: a case study report. Imaging and Therapy Practice 2017 August 21-24.Google Scholar
Krishna, S B, Varghese, S S, Gopurathingal, P G et al. Natural progression and clinical significance of incidentally detected pulmonary nodules in radiotherapy planning CT scans of breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort. J Radiotherapy Prac 2016; 15 (4): 359363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B, Lim, A, Lalvani, A et al. The clinical significance of radiologically detected silent pulmonary nodules in early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2008; 19 (12): 20012006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callister, M E J, Baldwin, D R, Akram, A R et al. British Thoracic Society Guidelines for the Investigation and Management of Pulmonary Nodules. Thorax 2015; 70 (2).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacMahon, H, Naidich, D P, Goo, J M et al. Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017161659 Google Scholar
Health and Care Professions Council. Standards of Proficiency for Radiographers. https://www.hcpc-uk.org/standards/standards-of-proficiency/radiographers/ (Accessed 11 October 2021)Google Scholar
Nguyen, C, Dietz, N, Singh, A. Significant Incidental Findings Unrelated to the Primary Cancer on CT simulation Treatment Planning Scans. Int J Rad Onc Biol Physics 2021; 11 (3): 1 e508 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.1395 Google Scholar
In, K H, Kwon, Y S, Oh, I J et al. Lung cancer patients who are asymptomatic at diagnosis show favorable prognosis: a Korean Lung Cancer Registry Study. Lung Cancer 2009; 64 (2): 232237. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Sep 21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polanco, D, Pinilla, L, Gracia-Lavedan, E et al. Prognostic value of symptoms at lung cancer diagnosis: a three-year observational study. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13 (3): 14851494. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kocher, F, Lunger, F, Seeber, A et al. Incidental Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Registry-Based Analysis. Clin Lung Cancer 2016; 17 (1): 627.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.08.006 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farjah, F, Monsell, S E, Gould, M K et al. Association of the Intensity of Diagnostic Evaluation with Outcomes in Incidentally Detected Lung Nodules. JAMA Intern Med 2021; 181 (4): 480489. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8250 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed