No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Welfare, egalitarianism, and polarization: the politics of noncontributory social programs
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 January 2024
Abstract
This study analyzes the link between egalitarian ideals and the rise in party polarization in Congress. To demonstrate how philosophical differences over conceptions of fairness, equality, and justice help explain the recent growth in partisanship over the past few decades, I argue one overlooked explanatory factor which assists in capturing this ideological rift is noncontributory welfare spending. Recovering annual ideal point estimates between 1947 and 2018 that are comparable with annual federal spending, I use multivariate time series models and find convincing evidence which suggests welfare outlays have a strong short- and long-run effect on polarization. Moreover, analysis of the roll call record also shows when ideal point estimates are recovered by specific policy area, lawmakers exhibit higher levels of ideological separation on welfare compared to, among others, policies such as defense and transportation. Robustness checks confirm these findings also hold even when controlling for income inequality.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Abramowitz, Alan I., Alexander, Brad, and Gunning, Matthew. 2006. “Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 68: 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bafumi, Joseph, and Herron, Michael C.. 2010. “Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress.” American Political Science Review 104: 519–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Michael, and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2019. “Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America.” American Political Science Review 113: 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, William, and Sulkin, Tracy. 2018. Legislative Style. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Bill. 2008. The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-minded America is Tearing us Apart. Boston, MA: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
Bremner, Robert H. 1988. American Philanthropy. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, Mark D., Mariani, Mack D., and Stonecash, Jeffery M.. 2018. “Northern Democrats and Party Polarization in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27: 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Mark D., and Stonecash, Jeffery M.. 2015. Polarization and the Politics of Personal Responsibility. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudy, Jennifer. 2021. “Racial Sympathy and Its Political Consequences.” Journal of Politics 83: 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D., Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review 98: 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croly, Herbert. 2014. The Promise of American Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Crosson, Jesse M., Furnas, Alexander C., and Lorenz, Geoffrey M.. 2020. “Polarized Pluralism: Organizational Preferences and Biases in the American Pressure System.” American Political Science Review 114: 1117–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, Nicholas, and Lelkes, Yphtach. 2022. “The Nature of Affective Polarization: Disentangling Policy Disagreement from Partisan Identity.” American Journal of Political Science 66: 775–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, Todd, and Bowler, Shaun. 2022. “Who Wants to Raise Taxes.” Political Research Quarterly 75: 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Christopher, and Faricy, Christopher. 2020. “Race, “Deservingness,” and Social Spending Attitudes: The Role of Policy Delivery Mechanism.” Political Behavior 42: 819–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engle, Robert F., and Granger, C. W. J.. 1987. “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.” Econometrica 55: 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 2017. The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Faricy, Christopher G. 2015. Welfare for the Wealthy: Parties, Social Spending, and Inequality in the United States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Federico, Christopher M. 2004. “When Do Welfare Attitudes Become Racialized? The Paradoxical Effects of Education.” American Journal of Political Science 48: 374–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Stanley, and Steenbergen, Macro R.. 2001. “The Humanitarian Foundation of Public Support for Social Welfare.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 658–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 2002. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garand, James C. 2010. “Income Inequality, Party Polarization, Roll-Call Voting in the U.S. Senate.” Journal of Politics 72: 1109–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Jeremy. 2020. Losing to Win: Why Congressional Majorities Play Politics Instead of Make Laws. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstle, Gary. 2022. The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goren, Paul. 2003. “Race, Sophistication, and White Opinion on Government Spending.” Political Behavior 25: 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Clive W. J. 1969. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods.” Econometrica 37: 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Clive W. J., and Newbold, Paul. 1974. “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.” Journal of Econometrics 2: 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimmer, Justin. 2013. Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matter. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groenendylk, Eric, Sances, Michael W., and Zhirkov, Kirill. 2020. “Intraparty Polarization in American Politics.” Journal of Politics 82: 1616–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Matt, and Hopkins, David A.. 2016. Asymmetric Politics: Ideological Republicans and Interest Groups Democrats. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbridge, Laurel, and Malhotra, Neil. 2011. “Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress: Evidence from Survey Experiments.” American Journal of Political Science 55: 494–510
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 2007. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heberlig, Eric, Hetherington, Marc, and Larson, Bruce. 2006. “The Price of Leadership: Campaign Money and the Polarization of Congressional Parties.” Journal of Politics 68: 992–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 2001. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization.” American Political Science Review 95: 619–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Rudolph, Thomas J.. 2015. Why Washington Won’t Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, William G. 1994. “Public Attitudes Toward Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 336–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, William G. 2000. “Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 750–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessee, Stephen, and Theriault, Sean M.. 2012. “The Two Faces of Congressional Roll Call Voting.” Party Politics 20: 836–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochim, Ashley J., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2013. “Issue Politics in a Polarized Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 66: 352–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, Soren. 1988. “Statistical Analysis of Co-Integration Vectors.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12: 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Phillip Edwards. 2020. “Partisanship, Political Awareness, and Retrospective Evaluations, 2956-2016.” Political Behavior 42: 1295–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Michael B. 2013. The Undeserving Poor: America’s Enduring Confrontation with Poverty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Nathan J. 2017. America’s Inequality Trap. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kluegel, James R., and Smith, Elliot R.. 1986. Beliefs About Inequality. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ladewig, Jeffrey W. 2021. “Income Inequality and Ideological Positions in the U.S. Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 74: 599–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R., Phillips, Justin H., and Zelizer, Adam. 2019. “The Party or the Purse? Unequal Representation in the U.S. Senate.” American Political Science Review 113: 917–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., Green, John C., Herrera, Richard, and Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Party Politics.” American Political Science Review 104: 324–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1980. Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2016. It’s Even Worse Than It Was: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Margalit, Yotam M. 2013. “Explaining Social Policy Preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession.” American Political Science Review 107: 80–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2018. Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2016. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert, and Zaller, John. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes Toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mettler, Anne. 2011. The Submerged State. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999.
A Theory of Justice
, Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 1998. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 2013. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Schneider, Saundra K., and Jacoby, William G.. 2005. “Elite Discourse and American Public Opinion: The Case of Welfare Spending.” Political Research Quarterly 58: 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simas, Elizabeth N., Clifford, Scott, and Kirkland, Justin H.. 2020. “How Empathic Concern Fuels Political Polarization.” American Political Science Review 114: 258–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Carmines, Edward G.. 1997. Reaching Beyond Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., Carmines, Edward G., Layman, Geoffrey C., and Carter, Michael. 1996. “Beyond Race: Social Justice as a Race Neutral Ideal.” American Journal of Political Science 40: 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2: 3–21.Google Scholar
Stonecash, Jeffrey D., Brewer, Mark D., and Mariani, Mack. 2018. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhay, Elizabeth, Klasnja, Marko, and Rivero, Gonzalo. 2021. “Ideology of Affluence: Explanations for Inequality and Economic Policy Preferences among Rich Americans.” Journal of Politics 83: 367–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhay, Elizabeth, Tenenbaum, Mark, and Bartola, Austin. 2022. “Explanations for Inequality and Partisan Polarization in the US, 1980-2020.” The Forum 20: 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensen, Eric P. 2019. “Structured-Induced Deference or Equal and Coordinate Actor: Congressional Influence on American Foreign Policy.” American Politics Research 47: 88–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriault, Sean. 2013. The Gingrich Senators: The Roots of Partisan Warfare in Congress. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle M. 2014. “Ideological Moderates won’t Run: How Party Fit Matters for Partisan Polarization in Congress.” Journal of Politics 76: 786–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toda, Hiro Y., and Yamamoto, Taku. 1995. “Statistical Inference in Vector Regressions with Possibly Integrated Processes.” Journal of Econometrics 66: 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Webster, Steven W., and Abramowitz, Alan I.. 2017. “The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate.” American Politics Research 45: 621–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, B. Dan, and Jordan, Soren. 2017. Party Polarization in America: The War Over Two Social Contracts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensen supplementary material
Svensen supplementary material 1
File
11.8 KB
Svensen supplementary material
Svensen supplementary material 2
PDF
82.2 KB