Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T04:48:30.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Experiments and the Habitual Force of Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Steven E. Rhoads
Steven E. Rhoads
Affiliation:
Government and Foreign Affairs, University of Virginia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Advocates of pervasive social experimentation neglect to consider the effect that suchexperimentation might have on citizens' respect for the law and their inclination to obey it. Since habit plays a large part in law abidingness, frequent alterations in law, even when substantively justified on narrow policy grounds, weaken the power of law in general. Because of their great utility, we should use social experiments occasionally when they can shed light on crucial dimensions of truly important policy questions. But because pervasive experimentation threatens law abidingness and citizen support for the regime, we should decide against some otherwise justifiable experiments and neither expect nor wish for the sort of experimenting society advocated by many social scientists.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 33 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aristotle, (1984). The Politics of Aristotle. Carnes, Lord ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald (1969). ‘Reforms as Experiments’. American Psychologist. 24: 420–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald (1971). ‘Methods for the Experimenting Society’ Paper delivered to the American Psychological Association in Washington, D.C.09 5. Cited in The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment (1974).Google Scholar
Clor, Harry (1974), ‘On the Moral Authority and Value of Law: the Province of Jurisprudence Undetermined’. Minnesota Law Review 58: 595–99.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1935). Liberalism and Social Action. (Originally published by G. P. Putnam, New York; and Capricorn, 1963. New York.)Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1950). Reconstruction in Philosophy. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Frieden, Bernard (1986). ‘Housing Allowances: An Experiment That Worked’. The Public Interest 15–35.Google Scholar
Gilbert, John, Richard, Light and Frederick, Mosteller (1975). ‘Assessing Social Innovations: An Empirical Base for Policy’. In Benefit Cost and Policy Analysis, Zeckhauser, Richard et al. , eds. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Goldwin, Robert (1972). ‘John Dewey’. In History of Political Philosophy, Strauss, Leo and Cropsey, Joseph, eds. Chicago: Rand, McNally: 804–22.Google Scholar
Greenberg, David, and Robins, Philip (1986) ‘The Changing Role of Social Experiments in Policy Analysis’. Journal of Policy Analysis. 5: 340–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment: A Summary Report(1974). Washington, D.C.: Police Foundation.Google Scholar
Kershaw, David (1975). ‘Comments’. In Ethical and Legal Issues of Social Experimentation. Rivlin, Alice and Timpane, P. Michael, eds., Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Madison, James (1981), Alexander Hamilton and John Jay. The Federalist Papers. Fairfield, Roy, ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
Pate, Anthony (1987), Police Foundation. Telephone interview.Google Scholar
Rand Note N–1086–HUD (1981). South Bend Press Coverage of the Housing Assistance Supply Experiment: January-December 1974. Santa Barbara: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Rand Report R–2880–HUD (1982). Experimenting with Housing Allowances: Executive Summary. Santa Barbara, Ca: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
Rhoads, Steven (1985). The Economist's View of the World: Government, Markets and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ricci, David (1984). The Tragedy of Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rivlin, Alice (1971). Systematic Thinking for Social Action. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Rossi, , Boeckmann, Peter Margaret and Berk, Richard. (1978) ‘Some Ethical Implications of the New Jersey – Pennsylvania Income Maintenance Experiment’. In The Ethics of Social Intervention, Bermant, Gordon, Kelam, Herbert and Warwick, Donald, eds. New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques (1964). Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among MenM. Masters, Roger, ed. New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Schelling (1975) ‘General Comments’. Ethical and Legal Issues of Social Experimentation. Rivlin, Alice and Timpane, P. Michael, eds. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Thoits, Peggy and Hannan, Michael (1978). Income and Psychological Distress: Evidencefrom the Seattle and Denver Income Maintenance Experiments. Research Memorandum Number 50. Menlo Park, California: Stanford Research Institute.Google Scholar
Warwick, Donald (1978) ‘Ethical Guidelines for Social Experiments’. In The Ethics of Social Intervention, Bermant, Gordon, Kelman, Herbert and Warwick, Donald, eds, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Williams, Robert (1987). Telephone interview with the former supervisor of the Denver Income Maintenance Experiment.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. (1983) ‘Crime and Public Policy’. In Crime and Public Policy, Wilson, J.Q., ed. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google Scholar