Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T10:57:50.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Guessing and Choosing: A Multicriterion Decision on Disposal Technology for Low-Level Radioactive Waste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Dennis Coates  and
Michael Munger
Dennis Coates
Affiliation:
Economics
Michael Munger
Affiliation:
Economics and Political Science, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public officials faced with difficult and technologically complex decisions often resort to decision rules that purport to aggregate disparate judgements. Such multicriterion decisions are only as good as the procedures used to perform such aggregation, however. We examine the use of one such decision-making tool, a variant of the Delphi technique, in the choice of a disposal technology for low-level radioactive waste for the Southeast Compact Commission in the United States. The case focuses on the danger when officials guess when they think they are choosing. Choosing occurs when all participants understand the implications, and sensitivities, of the technique used to aggregate judgement; guessing occurs when the participants choose randomly or without full knowledge of the properties of the process.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 1991 , pp. 275 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arrow, K.J. (1963), Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dalkey, N., Rourke, D., Lewis, R. and Snyder, D. (1973), Studies in the Quality of Life: Delphi and Decision-Making. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath & Co.Google Scholar
Final Report on Management of Low-Level Radioactive Waste in the Southeast Compact Region. Volumes I–III.Google Scholar
Dames, and Moore, (Consultants), July 1985.Google Scholar
Massimo, Florio (1990), ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Control of Public Expenditure: An Assessment of British Experience in the 1980s’, Journal of Public Policy, 10(2): 103–31.Google Scholar
Linder, Stephen H. (1982) ‘Decision rules and regulatory reform’, Journal of Public Policy, 2(4): 379–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linstone, H. and Turoff, Murray, eds. (1975), The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities: Conceptual Designs and Assessments, Texas Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Authority, vol. 1–5, 02, 1987.Google Scholar
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act, Amendments, Etc. (1986). Public Law 99–240, 01 15, 1986. Washington, DC: U.S.G.P.O.Google Scholar
MacRae, D. and Whittington, D. (1991), Policy Analysis and Beyond. Book Manuscript, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Program in Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
Murray, Raymond L. (1989), Understanding Radioactive Waste. 3rd ed., OH: Battelle Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1976), The Shallow Land Burial of Low-Level Radioactively Contaminated Solid Waste. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (1983), Procedures and Technology for Shallow Land Burial. Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Handbook Series. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.Google Scholar
Pill, J. (1971), ‘The Delphi Method: Substance, Context, a Critique, and an Annotated Bibliography’. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 5: 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackman, H. (1974), Delphi Assessment: Expert Opinion, Forecasting, and Group Process. Santa Monica, CA: Rand, R-1283-PR.Google Scholar
Sackman, H. (1975), Delphi Critique. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1982), Choice, Welfare, and Measurement. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, Harlan and Zeigler, Harmon (1975), ‘The Delphi Technique and Its Uses in Social Science Research’. Journal of Creative Behavior, 9: 253–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turoff, Murray (1970), ‘The Design of a Policy Delphi’. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2: 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeleny, M. (1982), Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Quantitative Methods for Management Series. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar