Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

The evolution of public policy attitudes: comparing the mechanisms of policy support across the stages of a policy cycle

  • Sverker C. Jagers (a1), Simon Matti (a1) (a2) and Katarina Nordblom (a3)

Abstract

We analyse the importance of legitimacy on public policy support by comparing how drivers of public policy attitudes evolve across the policy process consisting of the input (the processes forgoing acquisition of power and the procedures permeating political decisionmaking), throughput (the inclusion of and interactions between actors in a governance system) and output (the substantive consequences of those decisions) stages. Using unique panel data through three phases of the implementation of a congestion tax in the Swedish city of Gothenburg, we find that legitimacy is indeed important in explaining policy support. Moreover, we find a lingering effect where support in one phase depends on legitimacy both in the present and in previous phases. Hence, our study takes us one step further on the road to understand the complicated dynamic mechanisms behind the interactions between policymaking, policy support, and the legitimacy and approval of politicians and political processes.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. Email: simon.matti@ltu.se

Footnotes

Hide All

Cite this article: Jagers SC, Matti S, Nordblom K. 2019. The evolution of public policy attitudes: comparing the mechanisms of policy support across the stages of a policy cycle. Journal of Public Policy X: 1–21, doi:10.1017/S0143814X19000023

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Beetham, D (1991) The Legitimation of Power. London: Macmillan Press.
Buchanan, A (2002) Political Legitimacy and Democracy. Ethics 112(4): 689719.
Citrin, J Muste, C (1999) Trust in Government. In Wrightsman LS, Shaver PR and Robinson JP (eds.), Measures of Political Attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 465532.
Doberstein, C Millar, H (2015) Balancing a House of Cards: Throughput Legitimacy in Canadian Governance Networks. Canadian Journal of Political Science 47(2): 259280.
Easton, D (1953) The Political System. New York: Knopf.
Esaiasson, P, Giljam, M Persson, M (2017) Responsiveness Beyond Policy Satisfaction: Does it Matter to Citizens?. Comparative Political Studies 50(6): 739765.
Esaiasson, P Wlezien, C (2017) Advances in the Study of Democratic Responsiveness: An Introduction. Comparative Political Studies 50(6): 699710.
Finger, M Finon, D (2011) From ‘Service Public’ to Universal Service. In Finger M and Künneke Rolf W (eds.), International Handbook on the Liberalization of Infrastructures. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 5469.
Føllesdal, A Hix, S (2006) Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533562.
Foyle, DC (2004) Leading the Public to War? The Influence of American Public Opinion on the Bush Administration’s Decision to Go to War in Iraq. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 16, 269294.
Freeman, R (2012) Reverb: Policy Making in Wave Form. Environment and Planning A 44(1): 1320.
Frey, BS (1997) Not Just For the Money. An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Giuliano, G (1992) An Assessment of the Political Acceptability of Congestion Pricing. Transportation 19(4): 335358.
Gormley, WT (2007) Public Policy Analysis: Ideas and Impacts. Annual Review of Political Science 10, 297313.
Gul, F (1991) A Theory of Disappointment Aversion. Econometrica 59(3): 667686.
Hagemann, S, Hobolt, SB Wratil, C (2017) Government Responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence From Council Voting. Comparative Political Studies 50(6): 850876.
Hall, PM McGinty, P (1997) Policy as the Transformation of Intentions: Producing Program from Statue. The Sociological Quarterly 38(3): 439467.
Hetherington, MJ (2005) Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, N. J. Princeton University Press.
Hodson, D Maher, I (2002) Economic and Monetary Union: Balancing Credibility and Legitimacy in an Asymmetric Policy-Mix. Journal of European Public Policy 9(3): 391407.
Jaensirisak, S, Wardman, M May, AD (2005) Explaining Variations in Public Acceptability of Road Pricing Schemes. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 39, 127153.
Jagers, SC Hammar, H (2009) Environmental Taxation for Good and for Bad: The Efficiency and Legitimacy of Sweden’s Carbon Tax. Environmental Politics 18(2): 218237.
Key, VO Jr (1961) Public Opinion and American Democracy. New York: Knopf.
Kingdon, JW (1995) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd edition. New York: HarperCollins.
Lipset, SM (1981) Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Liu, Z, Meng, Q Wang, S (2013) Speed-Based Toll Design for Cordon-Based Congestion Pricing Scheme. Transportation Research Part C 31, 8398.
Lubell, MN, Zahran, S Vedlitz, A (2007) Collective Action and Citizens Responses to Global Warming. Political Behavior 29(3): 391413.
McConnell, A (2010) Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Montpetit, E (2008) Policy Design for Legitimacy: Expert Knowledge, Citizens, Time and Inclusion in United Kingdom’s Biotechnology Sector. Public Administration 86(1): 259277.
Naurin, E (2009) Promising Democracy. Parties, Citizens and Election Promises. PhD dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Norris, P (2011) Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Odeck, J Bråthen, S (2002) Toll Financing in Norway: The Success, Failures and Perspective for the Future. Transport Policy 9, 253260.
Ostrom, E (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Page, BI Shapiro, RY (1983) Effects of Public Opinion on Policy. American Political Science Review 77, 175190.
Peters, GB (2005) Institutional Theory in Political Science: The “New Institutionalism”. London: Continuum.
Pierson, P (1993) When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics 45(4): 595628.
Przeworksi, A, Stokes, SS Manin, B (eds.) (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reinstra, SA, Rietveld, P Verhoef, ET (1999) The Social Support for Policy Measures in Passenger Transport. A Statistical Analysis for the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D 4, 181200.
Rosset, J, Giger, N Bernauer, J (2017) I the People? Self-Interest and Demand for Government Responsiveness. Comparative Political Studies 50(6): 794821.
Rotaris, L, Danielis, R, Marcucci, E Massiani, J (2010) The Urban Road Pricing Scheme to Curb Pollution in Milan, Italy: Description, Impacts and Preliminary Cost–Benefit Analysis Assessment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 44(5): 359375.
Rothstein, B (2009) Creating Political Legitimacy. Electoral Democracy Versus Quality of Government. American Behavioural Scientist 53(3): 311330.
Schade, J Schlag, B (2003) Acceptability of Urban Transport Pricing Strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 6, 4561.
Scharpf, FW (1999) Governing in Europe – Effective and Democratic?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schattschneider, EE (1935) Politics, Pressures and the Tariff: A Study of Free Private Enterprise in Pressure Politics, as Shown in the 1929–1930 Revision of the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Schmidt, VA (2013) Democracy and Legitimacy in the European Union Revisited: Input, Output and ‘Throughput’. Political Studies 61, 222.
Schneider, A Ingram, H (1993) Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy. American Political Science Review 87(2): 334347.
Schneider, S, Nullmeier, F Hurrelmann, A (2007) Exploring the Communicative Dimension of Legitimacy: Text Analytical Approaches. In Hurrelmann A , Schneider S and Steffek J (eds.), Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 126155.
Schuitema, G, Steg, L Forward, S (2010) Explaining Differences in Acceptability Before and Acceptance After the Implementation of a Congestion Charge in Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A 44, 99109.
Skocpol, T (1997) Boomerang: Health Care Reform and the Turn Against Government. New York: W.W. Norton.
Skogstad, G (2003) Legitimacy and/or Policy Effectiveness?: Network Governance and GMO Regulation in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 10(3): 321338.
Sobel, RS (2001) The Impact of Public Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy Since Vietnam: Constraining the Colossus. New York: Oxford University Press.
Soroka, S Wlezien, C (2010) Degrees of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Soss, J (1999) Lessons of Welfare: Policy Design, Political Learning, and Political Action. American Political Science Review 93(2): 363380.
Stimson, J (1991) Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Stimson, JA (2007) Perspectives on Representation: Asking the Right Questions and Getting the Right Answers. In Dalton RJ and Klingemann H-D (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 850861.
Stockholmförsöket (2006) Fakta och resultat från Stockholmsförsöket (Facts and Results from the Stockholm Trials: Final Version), 2nd ed., December. Available (in Swedish) at: www.stockholmsforsoket.se
Svallfors, S (2010) Policy Feedback, Generational Replacement, and Attitudes to State Intervention: Eastern and Western Germany, 1990–2006. European Political Science Review 2(1): 119135.
Teisman, GR (2000) Models for Research Into Decision‐Making Processes: On Phases, Streams and Decision‐Making Rounds. Public Administration 78(4): 937956.
Transport for London (2004) Impacts Monitoring: Second Annual Report. Available online at: http://content.tfl.gov.uk/impacts-monitoring-report-2.pdf
Transportstyrelsen (2014) Congestion Tax Gothenburg, http://www.transportstyrelsen.se/Global/Vag/Trangselskatt/Information%20på%20engelska.pdf (accessed 22 September 2014).
Transportstyrelsen (2016) Congestion Tax in Stockholm and Gothenburg, http://www.transportstyrelsen.se/en/road/Congestion-taxes-in-Stockholm-and-Goteborg/ (accessed 5 November 2016).
Tretvik, T (2003) Urban Road Pricing in Norway: Public Acceptability and Travel Behaviour. In Schade J, Schlag B (eds.), Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies. Oxford, Elsevier Science, 77–92.
Wallner, J (2008) Legitimacy and Public Policy: Seeing Beyond Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Performance. The Policy Studies Journal 36(3): 421443.
Winslott-Hiselius, L, Brundell-Freij, K, Vagland, A Byström, C (2009) The Development of Public Attitudes Towards the Stockholm Congestion Trial. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 43, 269282.
Wlezien, C (1995) The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending. American Journal of Political Science 39, 9811000.
Wlezien, C (2017) Policy (Mis) Representation and the Cost of Ruling: U.S. Presidential Elections in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Political Studies 50(6): 711738.
Wlezien, C Soroka, S (2012) Political Institutions and the Opinion-Policy Link. West European Politics 35, 14071432.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Jagers et al. supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (42 KB)
42 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Jagers et al. dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed