Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:52:49.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do markets make good commissioners?: A quasi-experimental analysis of retail electric restructuring in Ohio – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2018

Noah Dormady ,
Zhongnan Jiang  and
Matthew Hoyt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 517 - 519
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

During the editing process incorrect labels were applied to figure 3, panels E, F & G. The correct representation of the figure is shown here.

Figure 3 Interrupted time series plots. (a) Akron, (b) Canton, (c) Cincinnati, (d) Cleveland, (e) Columbus, (f) Dayton and (g) Toledo.

The Publisher apologises for the error.

Footnotes

Cite this article: Dormady N., Jiang Z., Hoyt M. 2019. Do markets make good commissioners?: A quasiexperimental analysis of retail electric restructuring in Ohio. Journal of Public Policy 39: 517–519, doi: 10.1017/S0143814X18000338

References

Dormady, N, Jiang, Z Hoyt, M (2018) Do markets make good commissioners?: A quasi experimental analysis of retail electric restructuring in Ohio. Journal of Public Policy, first published online 3 July 2018. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X18000168 Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 3 Interrupted time series plots. (a) Akron, (b) Canton, (c) Cincinnati, (d) Cleveland, (e) Columbus, (f) Dayton and (g) Toledo.