Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:13:03.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetic field-line reconnection with jets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

A. M. Soward
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, The University, St Andrews KY16 9SS, Scotland
E. R. Priest
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, The University, St Andrews KY16 9SS, Scotland

Abstract

Some recent numerical simulations of driven magnetic field-line reconnection by Biskamp show no evidence of the Petschek mechanism when the reconnection rate or magnetic Reynolds number are large. Instead, an electric current sheet forms on the symmetry axis, across which a magnetic field is annihilated. The sheet terminates at a Y-point. Fluid driven into the current sheet escapes as jets along the separatrices emanating from the Y-point. This paper shows how many of the features such as the jets can be explained by a simple analytical model. Since the numerical simulations are necessarily on a bounded domain, the importance of the external boundary conditions in setting up a steady-state solution is stressed by illustrative examples.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Biskamp, D. 1984 See Hones 1984, p. 369.Google Scholar
Biskamp, D. 1986 Phys. Fluids. In press.Google Scholar
Biskamp, D. & Welter, H. 1980 Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T. G. 1986 Astrophys. J. In press.Google Scholar
Forbes, T. G. & Priest, E. R. 1982 Solar Phys. 81, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T. G. & Priest, E. B. 1983 Solar Phys. 88, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R. M. 1965 IAU Symposium, 22, 398.Google Scholar
Habbal, S. R. & Tuan, T.-F. 1979 J. Plasma Phys. 21, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hones, E. (ed.) 1984 Magnetic Reconnection in Space and Laboratory Plasmas. Geophys. Monograph 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, E. N. 1963 Astrophys. J. Suppl. 77, 8.Google Scholar
Petschek, H. E. 1964 AAS/NASA Symposium on Physics of Solar Flares (ed. W. Hess), p. 425.Google Scholar
Priest, E. R. 1985 Rep. Prog. Phys. 48, 955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, E. R. & Forbes, T. G. 1986 J. Geophys. Res. In press.Google Scholar
Sonnerup, B. U. Ö. 1970 J. Plasma Phys. 4, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soward, A. M. & Priest, E. R. 1977 Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 284, 369.Google Scholar
Sweet, P. A. 1958 Nuovo Cimento, suppl. 8, ser X, p. 188.Google Scholar
Syrovatsky, S. I. 1971 Soviet Phys. JETP, 33, 933.Google Scholar
Vasyliunas, V. M. 1975 Rev. Geophys. Space. Phys. 13, 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar