Skip to main content Accessibility help

Route Guidance Systems: Getting it Right from the Driver's Perspective

  • Gary Burnett (a1) and Sue Joyner (a1)


This paper presents a brief overview of current human factors research into route guidance systems. A short description of different interface styles is given and a review of two road-based studies of three existing route guidance systems is provided. A general discussion then highlights a range of issues of relevance to driver-system interfaces, drawing on results both from the studies carried out, and other research. Specific aspects addressed include the content and means of presenting route guidance information, and the potential effect of interface design on driver visual behaviour and performance.



Hide All
Ashby, M.Fairclough, S. H. & Parkes, A. M. (1991). A comparison of two route information systems in an urban environment. CEC DRIVE I Project V1017 (BERTIE), Report no. 47, HUSAT Research Institute.
Burnett, G. E. & Joyner, S. M. (1996). An assessment of moving-map and symbol-based route guidance systems. To be published in Ergonomics of Intelligent Vehicle Highway Systems, Noy, I. Y. (ed), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., New Jersey.
Burnett, G. E.May, A. J. & Ross, T. (1994). The prediction of the effectiveness of landmarks for use within a route guidance system. CEC DRIVE II Project V2008 (HARDIE), Report no. 15, HUSAT Research Institute.
Department of Transport (1989). Road Accidents Great Britain 1988: The Casualty Report. Transport Statistics Publications.
Dicks, L.Burnett, G. E. & Joyner, S. M. (1995). An evaluation of different types and levels of route guidance information. In Robertson, (ed.) Contemporary Ergonomics, pp. 193298, Taylor and Francis, London.
Ekerete, K. (1993). An evaluation of different means of visually representing distance route guidance information to the driver. BSc Ergonomics Thesis, Loughborough University of Technology.
Kishi, H. & Suigara, S. (1993). Human factors considerations for voice route guidance. SAE Technical Paper 930553.
Nicolle, C. A. & Stapleton, L. J. (1995). The TELAID design guidelines handbook for usability of in-vehicle systems by drivers with special needs. CEC DRIVE II Project V2032 (TELAID) Report no. 11, HUSAT Research Institute.
Parkes, A. M. (1991). Data capture techniques for RTI usability evaluation. In Advanced Telematics in Road Transport, Proceedings of the DRIVE Conference, vol. 2, pp. 14401456. Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Ross, T.Nicolle, C & Brade, S. (1994). An empirical study to determine guidelines for optimum timing of route guidance instructions. CEC DRIVE II Project V2008 (HARDIE), Report no. 13, HUSAT Research Institute.
Ross, T.Vaughan, G.Engert, A.Peters, H.Burnett, G. E. & May, A. J. (1995). Human factors guidelines for information presentation by route guidance and navigation system. CEC DRIVE II Project V2008 (HARDIE), Report no. 19, HUSAT Research Institute.
Rumar, K. (1988). In-vehicle information systems. International Journal of Vehicle Design, vol. 9, (4-5), PP. 548556.
Southall, D. (1995). A code of practice for in-vehicle information systems. In Nav gz: Mapping and the Display of Navigation Information, Proceedings of the Conference of the Royal Institute of Navigation.
Ward, N. J. & Parkes, A. M. (1994). Head-Up Displays and their automotive application: an overview of human factors issues affecting safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 26, (6), pp. 703717.
Wierwille, W. W.Antin, J. F.Dingus, T. A. & Hulse, M. C. (1988). Visual attentional demand of an in-car navigational display system. In Gale, A. G. et al. (ed.) Vision in Vehicles II, pp. 307316. Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Route Guidance Systems: Getting it Right from the Driver's Perspective

  • Gary Burnett (a1) and Sue Joyner (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.