Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:14:49.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Risk of a Ship Encounter Leading to a Collision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1978

G. R. G. Lewison
G. R. G. Lewison
Affiliation:
(National Maritime Institute)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An area of sea in which there are several traffic streams may be characterized by the number of potential encounters between two ships that would be expected to take place. The traffic flow in an area of 300 sq. n.m. of the Dover Strait over a nine-year period has been analysed to give the numbers of such potential encounters of head-on, crossing, and overtaking ships in three conditions of visibility. The number of collisions occurring has been similarly broken down and hence the risk of each different type of encounter leading to a collision has been determined. It is shown that decreasing visibility makes collision very much more likely, whereas the direction of encounter makes a comparatively minor difference to the probability.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , September 1978 , pp. 384 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Lewison, G. R. G. (1978). The modelling of marine traffic flow and potential encounters. Inst. of Maths and its Appl. Symposium on ‘Mathematical aspects of marine traffic’, London, Sept. 1977. Also published as NMI Report R5, February 1978.Google Scholar
2Barratt, M. J; (1976) Collision avoidance manoeuvres in restricted visibility. This Journal 29, 364 and NPL Mar. Sci. report R142, February 1976.Google Scholar
3Johnson, D. R. (1973) Traffic in the English Channel and Dover Strait. I—Traffic Surveys. This journal 26, 75.Google Scholar
4Bowdidge, I. (1977) Collisions and strandings in the Dover Strait area, i960–1976. NMI Report R2, April 1977.Google Scholar
5Cash, R. F. and Boribond, L. A. (1973) Traffic behaviour in the Dover Strait in poor and good visibility. NPL report Mar. Sci. R110, July 1973.Google Scholar
6Emden, R. K. (1976). The Dover Strait information service: recent progress. This Journal, 29, 263.Google Scholar
7Shipway, J. C. and Dare, S. C. (1973) Course and speed distributions of vessels contravening the Dover Strait separation scheme. NPL report Mar. Sci. R112, November 1973.Google Scholar
8Brown, I. S. H. and Wheatley, J. H. W. (1972) Circumstances of collisions and strandings in the Dover Strait area 1958–1971. NPL report Mar. Sci. R101, October 1972.Google Scholar
9Shipway, J. C. and Bowdidge, I. D. (1975) Trends in collision data for the Dover Strait area 1960–1974. NPL report Mar. Sci. R122, January 1975.Google Scholar