Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T07:24:43.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Precise GPS Positioning with Low-Cost Single-Frequency System in Multipath Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2010

Abdulla Alnaqbi  and
Ahmed El-Rabbany
Abdulla Alnaqbi
Affiliation:
(UAE Survey Department, Abu Dhabi, UAE)
Ahmed El-Rabbany
Affiliation:
(Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto) (Email: rabbany@ryerson.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Low-cost, single-frequency GPS systems provide economical positioning solutions to many geomatics applications, including GIS and low-accuracy surveying applications. Unfortunately however, the positioning accuracy obtained with those systems is not sufficient for many surveying applications. This is mainly due to the presence of ionospheric delay and multipath. In this research ionospheric delay is accounted for using regional high-resolution ionospheric maps produced by the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The major remaining constraint and challenging problem is multipath. This is because multipath is environmentally-dependent, difficult to model mathematically and cannot be reduced through differential positioning. This research proposes a new approach to identify multipath-contaminated L1 measurements through wavelet analysis. First, the difference between the code and carrier-phase measurements is estimated, leaving essentially twice the ionospheric delay, multipath and system noise. The ionospheric delay is largely removed by using high-resolution ionospheric delay maps produced by NOAA. The remaining residuals contain mainly low-frequency multipath, if it exists, and high-frequency system noise, which are decomposed using Daubechies family wavelets (db8). A satellite signal is identified as contaminated by multipath based on the standard deviation of the low-frequency part of the residual component. The L1 measurements obtained from the satellites with the lowest multipath are used to compute the final positions using two software packages, namely Trimble Total Control (TTC) and Bernese scientific processing software. The Magellan AC12 low-cost single-frequency GPS receiver was extensively tested in static mode. It is shown that accuracies within 5 cm are routinely obtained for baselines up to 65 km under various multipath environments.

Keywords

Low-cost, single-frequency GPSMultipathIonospheric correctionWavelet transform
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 301 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Masella, E., Gonthier, M., and Dumaine, M. (1997). The RT-Star: Features and Performance of a Low-Cost RTK OEM Sensor. Proceedings of the ION GPS'97, The International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the ION, Kansas City, Missouri, 53–59.Google Scholar
[2]Rizos, C., Han, S. and Han, X. (1998). Performance Analysis of a Single-Frequency, Low-Cost GPS Surveying System. Proceedings of 11th Int. Tech. Meeting of the Satellite Division of the US ION, GPS ION'98, Nashville, Tennessee, 427–435.Google Scholar
[3]Alkan, R. M., El-Rabbany, A. and Saka, M. H. (2006). Assessment of Low-Cost Garmin OEM GPS Receiver for Surveying Applications, Ontario Professional Surveyor, 49 (4), 14–16.Google Scholar
[4]Fu, W. and Rizos, C. (1997). The applications of wavelets to GPS signal processing. Proceedings of the 10th Int. Tech. Meeting of the Satellite Division of the U.S. Inst. of Navigation, Kansas City, Missouri, 16–19 September, 1385–1388.Google Scholar
[5]Aram, M., El-Rabbany, A., and Krishnan, S. (2007); Single frequency Multipath Mitigation Based on Wavelet Analysis. The Journal of Navigation. 60, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Braash, M. S. (1996). Multipath effects. In: Global Positioning System: theory and applications. Vol 1, ed. Parkinson, B.W. and Spilker, J.J. Jr., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Washington DC, 547–568.Google Scholar
[7]El-Rabbany, A. (2006) Advanced Satellite Positioning. Unpublished Lecture Notes, Department of Civil Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto.Google Scholar
[8]Langley, RB (1998). GPS Receivers and the Observables. In: Teunissen, PJG, Kleusberg, A (Eds) GPS for Geodesy. Springer, 151–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Rowell, T. F. (2005). USTEC: a new product from the Space Environment Center characterizing the ionospheric total electron content. GPS Solutions, 9, 236–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]NOAA (2007). Real-Time US Total Electron Content Product Description Document.pdf. (http://www.sec.noaa.gov/ustec/). Accessed on September 9th, 2007.Google Scholar
[11]Yousif, H. and El-Rabbany, A. (2007). Assessment of Several Interpolation Methods for Precise GPS Orbit, The Journal of Navigation 60, 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Satirapod, C. and Rizos, C. (2005). Multipath mitigation by wavelet analysis for GPS base station applications. Surv Rev 38(295), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Hofmann-Wellenhof -Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., and Wasle, E. (2008). GNSS Global Navigation Satellite Systems; GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO & more. Springer Wien New York.Google Scholar
[14]Dach, R., Hugentobler, U., Fridez, P. and Meindl, M. (2007). Bernese GPS Software Version 5·0 Manual, Astronomical Institute, University of Bern.Google Scholar