Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:55:02.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurements used in Experiments to Evaluate the Performance of Watch Officers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

J. F. Cook  and
C. M. Crawshaw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reviews the measures commonly used in experiments to evaluate collision avoidance systems. The use of Closest Point of Approach, Time to Closest Point of Approach, and Manoeuvre Magnitude was criticized particularly for multi-ship encounters. However, the data do suggest that two measures, Entropy and the use of experienced judges to give rank scores of performance, seem to be good measures even in multi-ship encounters. The use of a composite measure is not experimentally evaluated in this paper, but it is suggested that if one were used, it would have to be very complicated. Mr Cook is with the Department of Applied Psychology at UWIST, Dr Crawshaw in the Department of Psychology at the University of Hull.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , May 1983 , pp. 220 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aranow, P. I. (1979). Summary assessment of CAORF collision avoidance performance studies. In The Proceedings of the 3rd annual CAORF Symposium. US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Cook, J. F., Moss, W. D. and Crawshaw, C. M. (1982). An evaluation of a radar display showing target aspect in colour. This Journal 35, 339.Google Scholar
Jones, K. D. (1979). Measurements in collision avoidance experiments. In The Proceedings of the 3rd Annal CAORF symposium. US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Khinchin, A. I. (1957). Mathematical Foundations of Information Theory. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Michard, A. and Gerhardt, D. (1980). Cognitive ergonomics for a radar based maritime collision avoidance system. Paper delivered to the International Conference on Ergonomics and Transport, Swansea.Google Scholar
Pollack, M. (1977). Collision avoidance system benefits. In The Proceedings of the 1st Annual CAORF symposium. US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Reik, J. R. (1977). Collision avoidance behaviour and uncertainty. In The Proceedings of the 1st Annual CAORF Symposium. US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Williams, K. E. (1977). Human collision avoidance behaviour and uncertainty as a function of visibility, traffic density, and navigational aids. In The Proceedings of the 1st Annual CAORF Symposuim. US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar