Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:01:31.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MBOC and BOC(1,1) Performance Comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2008

N. Hoult ,
L. E. Aguado  and
P. Xia
N. Hoult*
Affiliation:
(Thales Research and Technology (UK) Ltd, Reading, UK)
L. E. Aguado
Affiliation:
(Advanced Digital Institute Ltd, Bingley, UK)
P. Xia
Affiliation:
(University of Leeds, Leeds, UK)
*
(Email: Nigel.Hoult@thalesgroup.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent months the US and the EU have agreed to change the modulation scheme for the new civil GPS and Galileo signals in the L1 band from Binary Offset Carrier (1,1) (BOC(1,1)) to a scheme having the so-called Multiplexed Binary Offset Carrier (MBOC) spectrum, although each system will implement this differently. This paper compares the performance of the new system in a number of areas against the original baseline. It is shown that the MBOC signal offers significant advantages in multipath and tracking performance, while retaining compatibility with BOC(1,1) receivers at the cost of a small correlation loss.

Keywords

GalileoMultipathMBOCModulation
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 61 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 613 - 627
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Artaud, G. et al. , (2007) CBOC performances using software receiver, in Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on GNSS Signals & Signal Processing – GNSS SIGNALS'2007, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 25–25 April 2007Google Scholar
Godet, J. and Crews, M. (2006). GPS-Galileo Working Group A (WG A) Recommendations on Ll OS/L1C Optimization. [online]. [Accessed 3rd September 2007]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.losangeles.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-070803-061pdf>>Google Scholar
Hein, G.W. and Ávila-Rodríguez, J.A. (2005). Performance of a Galileo PRS/GPS M-Code Combined Service. Proceedings of the Institute of Navigation National Technical Meeting 2005 , San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
Hein, G.W. et al (2006). MBOC: The New Optimized Spreading Modulation Recommended for Galileo L1 OS and GPS L1C. InsideGNSS, 1 (4), 57–66.Google Scholar
Hein, G.W., Betz, J.W. et al (2006). MBOC: The New Optimized Spreading Modulation Recommended for Galileo L1 OS and GPS L1C. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers/Institute of Navigation PLANS 2006, San Diego, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoult, N., Aguado, L. E. and Crescimbeni, R. (2006), Performance Comparison of TMBOC and CBOC signals, in Proceedings of the First CNES Workshop on Galileo Signals and Signal Processing , Toulouse, France, 12–13 October 2006.Google Scholar
Steingass, A. et al (2004), The High Resolution Aeronautical Multipath Navigation Channel, in Proceedings of Institute of Navigation NTM 2004 , San Diego, California USA, 26–28 January 2004.Google Scholar
Woodward, P.M. (1953). Probability and Information Theory, with Applications to Radar. Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar