Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T18:20:18.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of Navigational Safety Level on Seaport Fairway Capacity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2015

Wenyuan Wang ,
Yun Peng ,
Xiangqun Song  and
Yong Zhou
Wenyuan Wang
Affiliation:
(Port, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China)
Yun Peng
Affiliation:
(Port, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China)
Xiangqun Song*
Affiliation:
(Port, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China)
Yong Zhou
Affiliation:
(Port, Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China)
*
(E-mail: sxqun@126.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, the definition of seaport fairway capacity, considering port service level, is given by referring to both road and inland waterway capacity combined with the features of coastal fairways. In view of the navigation environment and ships' behaviour, the safety distance of ships entering and leaving a seaport is chosen as an overall index to evaluate the navigational safety level of a fairway. Based on the ship-following theory, an Arena-based seaport operating system simulation model is constructed to analyse the impact of safety level on seaport fairway capacity. For different navigational safety levels (i.e., minimum, general and adequate), seaport fairway capacity corresponding to different service levels and navigation durations is obtained. The results show that fairway capacity varies with safety level for a given port service level, and the lower the safety level is, the higher the fairway capacity is. Finally, a recommended navigational safety level and its associated fairway capacity are given to provide a theoretical foundation for fairway design and management.

Keywords

SeaportNavigational safety levelFairway capacitySimulation
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 68 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 1120 - 1132
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kijima, K. and Furukawa, Y. (2003). Automatic collision avoidance system using the concept of blocking area //Maneuvering and Control of Marine Craft 2003 (MCMC 2003): A Proceedings Volume from the 6th IFAC Conference, Girona, Spain, 17–19 September. Elsevier Science Limited.Google Scholar
Pietrzykowski, Z. (2008). Ship's fuzzy domain: a criterion for navigational safety in narrow fairways. The Journal of Navigation, 2008, 61(3), 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kujala, P, Hanninen, M, Arola, T. and Ylitalo, J. (2009). Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(8), 1349–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrzykowski, Z. (2007). Assessment of navigational safety level in ship encounter situations in open sea area. Archives of Transport, 19(4), 77–84.Google Scholar
Dong, Y., Jiang, Y. and He, L. (2007). Calculation Method of Inland Waterway's Throughput Capacity. Port and Waterway Engineering, 398(1), 59–65.Google Scholar
Chen, H. and Guo, G. (2008). Research of Ship Domain and the Traffic Capacity in Paratactic Bridge Water Area. Ship and Ocean Engineering, 37(5), 113–116.Google Scholar
Zhu, J. and Zhang, W. (2009). Calculation model of inland waterway transit capacity based on ship-following theory. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 9(5), 83–87.Google Scholar
Nam, K.C., Kwak, K.S. and Yu, M.S. (2002). Simulation Study of Container Terminal Performance. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, 128(3), 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, X., Zhang, J., Guo, Z. and Wang, W. (2010). Analysis of Navigation Duration Influence to Trafficability of Navigation Channel in Coastal Bulk Cargo Port Are. Port Engineering Technology, 47(2), 18–20.Google Scholar
Wang, W., Yang, B. and Guo, Z. (2013). Influence of operation days on fairway capacity in coastal bulk cargo port area based on port service level //Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics, Dongguan, China, 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, S. and Ren, X. (1985). Transport process and organization of vessel. Beijing: China Communications Press.Google Scholar
Wu, Z. and Zhu, J. (2004). Marine Traffic Engineering. 2nd ed. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University Press.Google Scholar
Guo, Z., Wang, W., Tang, G. and Song, X. (2010). Capacity of Navigation Channel Based on the Port Service Level. China Harbour Engineering, (169), 46–48.Google Scholar
United Nations. (1985). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Secretariat. Port Development: a handbook for Planners in developing Countries. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Zheng, X., Niu, S., Liu, Z. and Liu, Y. (2003). A Model for Traffic Flow Analysis. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 37(11), 1776–1779+1787.Google Scholar
Hong, B. (2007). Ship Maneuvering Principles and Techniques. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University Press.Google Scholar