Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:43:51.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adaptive Predictive Variable Structure Filter for Attitude Synchronization Estimation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2016

Lu Cao*
Affiliation:
(The State Key Laboratory of Astronautic Dynamics, China Xi'an Satellite Control Center, Xi'an 710043, China) (China Xi'an Satellite Control Center, Xi'an 710043, China)
Junqiang Li
Affiliation:
(The State Key Laboratory of Astronautic Dynamics, China Xi'an Satellite Control Center, Xi'an 710043, China)
Lei Han
Affiliation:
(China Xi'an Satellite Control Center, Xi'an 710043, China)
Hengnian Li
Affiliation:
(The State Key Laboratory of Astronautic Dynamics, China Xi'an Satellite Control Center, Xi'an 710043, China)

Abstract

In this paper, a novel Predictive Variable Structure Filter (PVSF) and its adaptive deformation (APVSF) are presented for attitude synchronisation during Satellite Formation Flying (SFF). The PVSF is proposed based on the variable structure control concept and applied to any nonlinear system with model errors. The model errors in the PVSF need not satisfy the assumption of Gaussian white noise; therefore, it has advantages in dealing with various kinds of uncertainties, parameter variations or noises. Then, the APVSF is also presented to adjust the smoothing boundary layer of PVSF by minimising the Mean-Square Error (MSE). Simulations are performed to demonstrate the accuracy, robustness, and stability of the proposed methodologies for the attitude synchronisation estimation of the SFF system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arasaratnam, I. and Haykin, S. (2009). Cubature Kalman filters. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 54(6), 12541269.Google Scholar
Bauer, F., Bristow, J., Carpenter, J., Garrison, J., Hartman, K., Lee, T., Long, A., Kelbel, D., Lu, V., How, J., Busse, F., Axelrad, P. and Moreau, M. (2001). Enabling Spacecraft Formation Flying in Any Earth Orbit Through Spaceborne GPS and Enhanced Autonomy Technologies. Space Technology, 20(4), 175185.Google Scholar
Crassidis, J.L. and Markley, F. (1997a). A minimum model error approach for attitude estimation. Journal of Guidance , Control and Dynamics, 20(6), 12411247.Google Scholar
Crassidis, J.L. and Markley, F. (1997b). Predictive filter for nonlinear system. Journal of Guidance , Control and Dynamics, 20(3), 566572.Google Scholar
Crassidis, J.L., Mason, P.A.C. and Mook, D.J. (1993). Riccati solution for the minimum model error algorithm. Journal of Guidance , Control and Dynamics, 16(6), 11811183.Google Scholar
De Ruiter, A. (2010). A simple suboptimal Kalman filter implementation for a gyro-corrected satellite attitude determination system. Proceedings of IMechE, Part G. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 224(7), 787802.Google Scholar
Folta, D., Bristow, J., Hawkins, A. and Dell, G. (2002). NASA's autonomous formation flying technology demonstration, Earth observing-1, First international symposium on formation flying missions and technologies, Center National d'Etudes Spatiales, France.Google Scholar
Grewal, M.S. and Andrews, A.P. (2001). Kalman filtering theory and practice, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
How, J., Twiggs, R., Weidow, D., Hartman, K. and Bauer, F. (1998). Orion: A low-cost demonstration of formation flying in space using GPS. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, AIAA Paper, 98–4398.Google Scholar
Julier, S.J. and Uhlmann, J.K. (2000). A new approach for nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimations. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 45(3), 477482.Google Scholar
Kalman, R.E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Transactions of ASME-Journal of Basic Engineering, 82(1), 3545.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, R. and Nicklasson, P.J. (2009). Spacecraft Formation Flying: A Review and New Results on State Feedback Control. ACTA , Astronautica, 65(11), 15371552.Google Scholar
Lawson, P. (2001). The Terrestrial Planet Finder. IEEE aerospace conference proceedings, Vol.4, IEEE Publ, Piscataway, NJ.Google Scholar
Lawton, J.R. and Beard, R.W. (2002). Synchronization Multiple Spacecraft Rotations. Automatica, 38(8), 13591364.Google Scholar
Liu, H.T., Shan, J.J. and Sun, D. (2007). Adaptive Synchronization Control of Multiple Spacecraft Formation Flying. Journal of Dynamical Systems , Measurement and Control . 129(3), 337342.Google Scholar
Lu, P. (1994). Nonlinear predictive controllers for continuous systems. Journal of Guidance , Control and Dynamics, 17(3), 553560.Google Scholar
Mook, D.J. and Junkins, J.L. (1988). Minimum model error estimation for poorly modelled dynamic system. Journal of Guidance , Control, and Dynamics, 3(4), 367375.Google Scholar
Neeck, S.P., Magner, T.J. and Paules, G.E. (2005). NASA's small satellite missions for Earth observation, Acta Astronautica, 56(1–2), 187192.Google Scholar
Norgaard, M., Poulsen, N.K. and Ravn, O. (2000). New developments in state estimation for nonlinear systems. Automatica, 36(11), 16271638.Google Scholar
Persson, S., Jacobsson, B. and Gill, E. (2005). Prisma: Demonstration mission for advanced rendezvous and formation flying technologies and sensors. International Astronautical Federation: 56th International Astronautical Congress 4, International Astronautical Congress Paper 05-B56B07, Paris.Google Scholar
Shan, J.J. (2008). 6-DOF Synchronization Control for Spacecraft Formation Flying. AIAA Paper, 2008–6468.Google Scholar
Slotine, J.J.E. and Li, W. (1991). Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice-Hall, NJ, 229236.Google Scholar
Stephen, A.G. (2011). Smooth Variable structure filtering: Theory and Applications. McMaster University, October.Google Scholar
Wei, C.Z., Park, S.Y. and Park, C. (2013). Linearized Dynamics Model for Relative Motion under a J2-Perturbed Elliptical Reference Orbit. International Journal of Nonlinear Mechanics, 55, 5569.Google Scholar