Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:37:44.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The multifaceted relationship between land and violent conflict: the case of Apaa evictions in Amuru district, northern Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2017

Doreen Nancy Kobusingye ,
Mathijs van Leeuwen  and
Han van Dijk
Doreen Nancy Kobusingye*
Affiliation:
African Studies Centre, Leiden University P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands and Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 1410, Mbarara, Uganda
Mathijs van Leeuwen*
Affiliation:
Centre for International Conflict Analysis and Management, Institute of Management Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9108, 6500 HK Nijmegen, the Netherlands and African Studies Centre, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
Han van Dijk*
Affiliation:
Africa Studies Centre, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden, the Netherlands and Sociology of Development and Change Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
*
Email: kobsdoris@yahoo.com
Email: m.vanleeuwen@fm.ru.nl, mathijs_van_leeuwen@hotmail.com
Email: dijkh@ascleiden.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper argues that violent conflict prominently impacts on land governance and so contributes to land conflicts in post-conflict settings. In the natural resources literature, the relationship between land and conflict is often explained in terms of environmental security or political ecology, and many have pointed out that the way land is governed in itself may be a source of conflict. However, less attention has been given to the effects of violent conflict on land and its governance in post-conflict situations. This paper argues that violent conflict affects land governance in many ways and that this in turn might contribute to further violent conflict. The argument builds around an extended case study of the Apaa evictions in Amuru District in Northern Uganda. The case illustrates how conflict around land is not just the result of resource scarcity and competition, but is the outcome of a combination of political, historical and social dynamics. Past policies on land and practices of land governance play a critical role in this. However at the same time, violent conflict has a critical impact on land access, transforms land governance authority and the rules applied. The land conflicts resulting from this, in turn, fuel ethnic tensions between local population groups, and grievances about those in power and the institutions that govern natural resources. The ways in which such problematic conflict-induced changes in land access and governance are dealt with by policymakers is critical for post-conflict stability.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 455 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anseeuw, W. & Alden, C. (eds). 2010. The Struggle Over Land in Africa: conflicts, politics and change. Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
Bannon, I. & Collier, P.. 2003. Natural Resources and Conflict: what can we do? Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Benjaminsen, T.A., Maganga, F. & Abdallah, M.J.. 2009. ‘The Kilosa killings: political ecology of a farmer-herder conflict in Tanzania’, Development and Change 40: 423–45.Google Scholar
Clover, J. 2010. ‘The role of land as a site and source of conflict in Angola’, in Anseeuw, W. & Alden, C., eds. The Struggle Over Land in Africa: conflicts, politics and change. Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
Cotula, L., Toulmin, C. & Hesse, C.. 2004. Land Tenure and Administration in Africa: lessons of experience and emerging issues. London: International Institute for environment and Development.Google Scholar
Cramer, C. 2006. Civil War is Not a Stupid Thing: accounting for violence in developing countries. London: Hurst and Company.Google Scholar
Cramer, C. & Richards, P.. 2011. ‘Violence and war in agrarian perspective’, Agrarian Change 11: 277–97.Google Scholar
Daudelin, J. 2003. Land and Violence in Post-Conflict Situations. Ottawa: The North-South Institute.Google Scholar
Fishbourne, E.C. 1909. ‘Lake Kyoga (Ibrahim) Exploratory Survey, 1907–1908’. The Geographical Journal 33(2): 192–5.Google Scholar
Good, M.C. 1972. ‘Salt, trade, and disease: aspects of development in Africa's Northern Great Lakes Region’, International Journal of African Historical Studies 5, 4: 543–86.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. 1968. ‘The tragedy of the commons’, Science 162, 3859: 1243–8.Google Scholar
Homer-Dixon, T. 1999. Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huggins, C. 2010. ‘Shades of grey: post-conflict land policy reform in the Great Lakes Region’, in Anseeuw, W. & Alden, C., eds. The Struggle Over Land in Africa: conflicts, politics and change. Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
Kobusingye, N.D. Forthcoming. ‘Decentralized land governance and power complexities in large scale land allocations: the case of Amuru Sugar Project in Uganda’.Google Scholar
Kobusingye, N.D., Van Leeuwen, M. & Van Dijk, H.. 2016. ‘Where do I report my land dispute? The impact of institutional proliferation on land governance in post-conflict Northern Uganda’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law. doi: 10.1080/07329113.2016.1195673.Google Scholar
Korf, B. & Funfgeld, H.. 2006. ‘War and the commons: assessing the changing politics of violence, access and entitlements in Sri Lanka’, Geoforum 37: 391–403.Google Scholar
Le Billon, P. 2001. ‘The political ecology of war: natural resources and armed conflicts’, Political Geography 20: 561–84.Google Scholar
Lenhart, L. 2013. ‘Alleged land grabs and governance: exploring mistrust and trust in Northern Uganda – the case of Apaa land conflict’, Journal of Peace and Strategic Studies 1, Special Issue: Unfolding Land Conflicts in Northern Uganda.Google Scholar
Peluso, L.N. 1993. ‘Coercing conservation? The politics of state resource control’, Global Environmental Change 3, 2: 199–218.Google Scholar
Peluso, L.N. & Watts, M. (eds). 2001. Violent Environments. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Peluso, L.N. & Vandergeest, P.. 2011. ‘Political ecologies of war and forests: counterinsurgencies and the making of national natures’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101, 3: 587–608.Google Scholar
Peters, P.E. 2004. ‘Inequality and social conflict over land in Africa’, Journal of Agrarian Change 3: 269–314.Google Scholar
Pons-Vignon, N. & Solignac Lecomte, B.H.. 2004. ‘Land, violent conflict and development’, OECD Development Centre, Working Paper No. 233.Google Scholar
Refugee Law Project (RLP). 2012. Situation Brief: Border or Ownership Question: The Apaa Land Dispute. Kampala: RLP and Advisory Consortium on Conflict Sensitivity.Google Scholar
Ross, M.L. 2004. ‘What do we know about natural resources and civil war?’ Peace Research 41, 3: 337–56.Google Scholar
Rugadya, M.A., Nsamba-Gayiiya, E. & Kamusime, H.. 2008. Northern Uganda Land Study: Analysis of Post Conflict Land Policy and Land Administration: A Survey of IDP Return and Resettlement Issues and Lesson: Acholi and Lango Regions. World Bank.Google Scholar
Selby, R., Bardosh, K., Picozzi, K., Waiswa, C. & Welburn, S.C.. 2013. ‘Cattle movements and Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense: sleeping sickness in post-conflict Uganda’. Parasites and Vectors 6: 281.Google Scholar
Turner, D.M. 2004. ‘Political ecology and the moral dimensions of ‘‘resource conflicts’’: the case of farmer–herder conflicts in the Sahel’, Political Geography 23: 863–89.Google Scholar
Unruh, J.D. 2003. ‘Land tenure and legal pluralism in the peace process’, Peace and Change 28, 3: 352–77.Google Scholar
Unruh, J.D. 2004. Post-conflict Land Tenure: using a sustainable livelihoods approach. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. LSP Working Paper 18.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, M. & Van der Haar, G.. 2016. ‘Theorizing the land – violent conflict nexus’, World Development 78: 94–104.Google Scholar
Vircoulon, T. 2010. ‘The Ituri Paradox: when armed groups have a land policy and peacemakers do not’, in Anseeuw, W. & Alden, C., eds. The Struggle Over Land in Africa: conflicts, politics and change. Cape Town: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
Vlassenroot, K. & Raeymaekers, T.. 2004. ‘The politics of rebellion and intervention in Ituri: the emergence of a new political complex?’ African Affairs 103, 412: 385–412.Google Scholar
Wiley, L.A. 2006. Land Rights Reform and Governance in Africa: how to make it work in the 21st century? New York, NY: UNDP Dryland Development Centre.Google Scholar

News Media

Lawino, S. 14.2.2012. ‘Amuru Locals Secure Court Injunction to Halt Eviction’. Kampala, Daily Monitor.Google Scholar
Makumbi, C. 27.9.2012. ‘Apaa Locals Demand Meeting with Museveni Over Land Row’. Kampala, Daily Monitor.Google Scholar