¹ See, for example, Halliday, Fred, ‘State and Society in International Relations: a second agenda’, in Dyer, Hugh and Magasarian, Leon, The Study of International Relations- the State of the Art (London, 1989), pp. 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

² Delays in sending U.N. electoral monitors and peace-keepers, as well as in the process of demobilising the armies of both sides, means that the elections may have to be delayed until April/May 1994.Google ScholarAfrica Confidential (London), 8 01 1993, p. 6.Google Scholar

³ The official interpretation of the events of 1968 is contained in the document put out the following year by the Central Committee of Frelimo, entitled ‘Os Graves Acontecimentos de 1968 e as Divergências Ideológicas’ (‘The Grave Events of 1968 and the Ideological Disputes’), Dar es Salaam, mimeographed, 1969.Google Scholar

⁴ See the various issues of Mozambique Revolution (Dar es Salaam) of this period.Google Scholar

⁵ Hyden, Goran, Beyond Ujamaa in Tanzania: underdevelopment and an uncaptured peasantry (London, 1980), p. 102.Google Scholar

⁶ For a representative sample of works in this vein, see Cliffe, Lionel and Saul, John S. (eds.), Socialiam in Tanzania: an interdisciplinary reader, Vol. 1, Politics, and Vol. 2, Policies (Nairobi, 1972 and 1973). It is noteworthy that Saul, while a Lecturer in Political Science at the University of Dar es Salaam also worked at Frelimo's office in Tanzania, and after independence taught at the Eduardo Mondlane University in Maputo.Google Scholar

⁷ Nkrumah, Kwame, Class Struggle in Africa (London, 1970), p. 10.Google Scholar

⁸ Brutents, Karen, ‘African Revolution: gains and problems’, in International Affairs (Moscow), 01 1967, p. 21.Google Scholar

⁹ For an overview of the theoretical debates amongst Soviet scholars on this issue, see Golan, Galia, The Soviet Union and National Liberation Movements in the Third World (London, 1988), pp. 78–84.Google Scholar

¹⁰ ‘Mensagem do Presidente da Frelimo para os Combatentes das FPLM e ao Povo Moçambicano, por Ocasião do 7 Aniversário da Luta Armada de Libertação Nacional’ in ‘A Vitória Organisa-se’, in Textos e Documentos da Frelimo, 2 (Maputo, 1977).Google Scholar

¹¹ See ‘O Partido e as Classes Trabalhadoras Moçambicanas na Edificação da Democracia Popular’, Relatório do Comité Central ao III Congresso da Frelimo, Maputo, 1977.Google Scholar

¹² In a series of speeches in May and June 1975, Machel, Samora warned churches that Frelimo would be the only organisation allowed to proselytise.Google ScholarLegum, Colin (ed.), Africa Contemporary Record, 1975–76 (London, 1976), p. B278.Google Scholar

¹³ Frelimo's sense of insecurity was compounded by an abortive settler putsch in September 1974 which had been launched on the assumption that Pretoria would come to the assistance of those involved. Ibid. pp. B274–5.

¹⁴ The standard account of the formation of Renamo is contained in the memoirs of Flowers, Ken, Serving Secretly: an intelligence chief on record, Rhodesia into Zimbabwe, 1964–1981 (London, 1987).Google Scholar

¹⁵ Africa Contemporary Record, 1975–76, pp. B283–4.

¹⁶ Kulik, S., ‘Mozambique: on the road to progress’, in New Times (Moscow), 20, 05 1976, p. 24.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Solidovnikov, V. G. and Gavrilov, N., ‘Africa: tendencies of non-capitalist development’, in International Affairs, 03 1976, p. 33.Google Scholar

¹⁸ See Meyns, Peter, ‘Liberation Ideology and National Development Strategy in Mozambique’, in Review of African Political Economy (Sheffield), 22, 10–12 1981, pp. 42–64.Google Scholar

¹⁹ David, and Ottaway, Marina, Afrocommunism (New York, 1981), p. 80.Google Scholar

²⁰ Ibid. p. 82.

²¹ Africa Contemporary Record, 1976–77, pp. B292–3.

²² See Geffray, Christian, La Cause des armes au Mozambique: anthropologie d'une guerre civile (Paris, 1990),Google Scholar and Vines, Alex, Renamo: terrorism in Mozambique (London, 1991).Google Scholar

²³ Editorial, Estudos Moçambicanos (Centro de Estudos Africanos, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo), 3, 1981, p. 6.Google Scholar

²⁴ Hanlon, Joseph, Mozambique: the revolution under fire (London, 1984), p. 103.Google Scholar

²⁵ ‘Levar o Povo a Participar em Todas as Fases do Plano’, Summary of the Discussions held at an Extraordinary Meeting of the Council of Ministers, 20 April 1981, in Noticias (Maputo), 21 April 1981, pp. 3–4.Google Scholar

²⁶ Ibid. 25 August 1981.

²⁷ In his pioneering study of the war in the district of Erati in Nampula province, Geffray, notes in op. cit. pp. 175–7, that ‘Some weeks after the forced displacement of the inhabitants by the armed forces, the first overpopulated villages were attacked by Renamo. After these attacks, the officers commanding the detachment of guerrillas… explained the hostility of their organisation to the communal villages. They invited the villagers to return to the lands they had abandoned under Frelimo's orders.’Google Scholar

²⁸ Simpson, Mark, ‘Political Decompression and Historical Revisionism in Mozambique’, in Southern African Issues (South African Institute of International Affairs, Johannesburg), 4, 1992, p. 17.Google Scholar

²⁹ Documents containing evidence of continued support for Renamo by the South African Defence Force were captured in a joint Mozambican-Zimbabwean offensive against the rebel headquarters in 1985. Even after de Klerk became President, reports continued to filter through of continued external help for Renamo. The Weekly Mail (Johannesburg), 9 03 1990.Google Scholar

³⁰ ‘Relatório da Comissão das Directivas Económicas e Socias’ (‘Report of the Commission on Economic and Social Directives’), Frelimo, Maputo, 1983.Google Scholar

³¹ Government of Mozambique, National Planning Commission, ‘Economic Report’, Maputo, 01 1984.Google Scholar

³² The seriousness of the economic situation had already become evident as far back as 1983, when Mozambique defaulted on its external debt which then stood at U.S.$1,664 million. The following year the Government was forced to ask its creditors for a moratorium on repayments. Africa Contemporary Record, 1983–84, p. B675.Google Scholar

³³ Hanlon, Joseph, Mozambique: who calls the shots? (London, 1991), p. 151.Google Scholar

³⁴ Mozambiquefile (Maputo), 01 1991.Google Scholar

³⁵ The success of the new membership policy can be gauged by the fact that at the Sixth Congress held in August 1991, President Joaquim Chissano announced that Frelimo's membership had risen to almost half a million, up 140 per cent since the Congress of 1989.Google ScholarSpecial Report No. 7 (Mozambique Information Office, London), 4 09 1991.Google Scholar

³⁶ English translation of the 1975 constitution, in Facts and Reports (Amsterdam), 19–20, 4 10 1975, and 21, 18 October 1975.Google Scholar

³⁷ Special Report No. 2, 5 November 1990. The name of the country was also changed from The People's Republic of Mozambique to simply Republic of Mozambique.Google Scholar

³⁸ Weitz, Richard, ‘Continuities in Soviet Foreign Policy: the case of Mozambique’, in Comparative Strategy (New York), 11, 1, 01–03 1992, p. 85.Google Scholar

³⁹ The New York Times, 17 December 1989.

⁴⁰ Vines, op. cit. pp. 61–6.

⁴¹ Economist Intelligence Unit, Mozambique Country Profile, 1991–1992 (London, 1992), p. 35.Google Scholar

⁴² For an overview of the negotiations process, see Alden, Chris and Simpson, Mark, ‘Mozambique: a delicate peace’, in The Journal of Modern African Studies (Cambridge), 31, 1, 1993, pp. 109–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁴³ See Hermele, Kenneth, Mozambican Crossroads-Economics and Politics in the Era of Structural Adjustment (Department of Social Science and Development, Chr. Michelsen Institute, Fantoft, Norway, 1990), who argues on p. 42 that what is now taking place is ‘a weak, dependent form of capitalism, which is basically serving the South African economy with labour, transport routes, markets and raw materials…where the primary goal is easy profit, while capitalism's productive capacity remains untapped.’Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Vieira, Sergio, a leading light on the left of the party, and who had held the posts of Minister of Agriculture and Security, failed to even secure re-election to the Central Committee. Special Report No. 7, 4 September 1991.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Saul, John S., ‘Mozambique: the failure of socialism?’, in Transformation (Durban), 14, 1991, p. 105.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ See, for example, Economist Intelligence Unit, Mozambique Country Report, No. 4 (London, 1991), which contains allegations of land-grabbing and dispossession of small farmers by government officials.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Mediafax (Maputo), 15 10 1992, p. 1.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Zacarias, Agostinho, ‘A Propósito da Sociedade Civil’, in Noticias, 9 May 1992.Google Scholar