Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T13:31:58.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ethnic-sectoral cleavages and economic development: reflections on the second Kenya debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2003

Paul Vandenberg
Affiliation:
Geneva.

Abstract

The second Kenya debate has prompted a close examination of the role of an ethnic business community – Indians/Asians – in the country's industrial development. While this community does own up to three-quarters of the country's medium and large-scale manufacturing firms, a narrow focus on manufacturing understates the contribution which Africans have made to the economy. A progressive rural business class is more likely to re-invest in profitable farming activities and to branch out into agro-processing, transport and trading than to undertake risky investments in urban manufacturing. As a result, historical ethnic-sectoral cleavages will tend to be reinforced. The article provides new calculations on the extent of African involvement in manufacturing, and reviews an ancillary literature which uses institutional and socio-economic analysis to understand differences in Kenya's business communities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The paper was drafted during a visiting professorship in the Department of International Economics, Senshu University, Tokyo and presented at a joint meeting of Senshu's Institute for Social Sciences and Institute for the Humanities. The author is most grateful to Professor H. Horie, other faculty and the staff at the International Centre for their generosity and kindness during his stay. Insightful comments from seminar participants, Machiko Nissanke and two anonymous referees were invaluable in revising the paper.