Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T08:01:40.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study on Some Clinical Aspects of the Relationship between Obsessional Neurosis and Psychotic Reaction Types

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

E. Stengel*
Affiliation:
From the Royal Edinburgh Hospital for Mental and Nervous Disorders

Extract

The interrelationship between neurotic manifestations and psychotic reaction types represents one of the major problems of psychiatry. Psychotic reactions sometimes develop in patients with old-standing neuroses. It is also well known that neurotic symptoms are not uncommon in the preliminary stages and during the course of psychoses. However, the knowledge of the interaction between neurotic and psychotic manifestations is still incomplete. In this study an attempt is made to elucidate some of the clinical aspects of this problem. It is not intended to discuss here such basic issues as the definition of neurosis and psychosis and their interrelationship in general. Those questions have been widely debated, and it seems doubtful whether much can be gained from a continuation of this discussion at the present stage of psychiatric knowledge. In a clinical study the question whether or not there is a fundamental difference between neurotic and psychotic symptoms and behaviour is better left open. An investigation into the interplay between various phenomena of mental illness occurring in individual patients is justified, even if one looks at them as manifestations of a single and continuous development.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1945 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, K., Selected Papers. London, 1927.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E., Text-book of Psychiatry. London, 1924.Google Scholar
Bonhoeffer, K. (1913), Monats. f. Psychiat. and Neur., 33.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J., Personality and Mental Illness. London, 1940.Google Scholar
Brill, A. A. (1941), Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 46, 738.Google Scholar
Brunswick, R. M. (1928), Internat. J. Psychoanal., 9, 439.Google Scholar
Coltop, F. (1938), Psychiat. en Neurol. Bladen, 42, 17.Google Scholar
Freud, S., Collected Papers, vols. ii, iii. Internat. Psychoanal. Press, 1926.Google Scholar
Glover, E. (1930), Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 10, 226.—(1932) J. Ment. Sci., 78, 819.—(1935) Internat. J. Psychoan., 16, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, A. (1926), Am. J. Psychiat., 5, 647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrowes, W. H. (1931), J. Ment. Sci., 77, 375.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. K. (1916), ibid., 62, 556.—(1937) “The Affective Reaction Types,” Psychiatry for Practitioners, ed. by H. R. Christian. New York.Google Scholar
Idem and Gillespie, R. D. (1944), A Text-book of Psychiatry, London, 1944.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, W. (1930), Arch. f. Psychiat., 91, 589.Google Scholar
Jahrreis, W. (1926), ibid., 77.Google Scholar
Janet, P. M., Les Obsessions et la Psychasthénie. Paris, 1903.Google Scholar
Jones, E. (1929), Internat. J. Psychoanal., 10, 383.Google Scholar
Kahn, E., Psychopathic Personalities. Newhaven, 1929.Google Scholar
Idem and Cohen, L. H. (1932), Am. J. Psychiat., 88, 1025.Google Scholar
Kehrer, E., and Kretschmer, , Die Veranlagung zu seelischen Störungen. Berlin, 1929.Google Scholar
Lange, J. (1925), Zeitsch. ges. Neur. Psychiat., 94.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. (1934), J. Ment. Sci., 80, 277.—(1936) Ibid., 82, 488.—(1936) Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 29, 325.Google Scholar
Lion, E. G. (1942), J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 95, 730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luxemburger, H. (1930), Arch. f. Psychiat., 91, 590.Google Scholar
Mapother, E. (1926), The Lancet Extra Numbers, No. 2, 89.Google Scholar
Idem and Lewis, A., “Psychological Medicine” in Price's Text-book of Medicine . London, 1941.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W. (1932), Bumke's Handb. d. Geisteskr., 9, 456.Google Scholar
Meyer, A. (1912), Nerv. Ment. Dis., Monogr. Series, No. 9, 155.Google Scholar
Myerson, A. (1936), Am. J. Psychiat., 93, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. R. (1940), ibid., 96, 889.Google Scholar
Oltman, J. E., and Friedman, S. (1943), J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 97, 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilcz, A. (1922), Jahrb. f. Psychiat., 41.Google Scholar
Schneider, K. (1925), Arch. f. Psychiat., 74, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, E. (1943), J. Neur. Psychiat., 6, 1.Google Scholar
Stoecker, W. (1914), Zeitsch. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 23, 121.Google Scholar
Titley, W. B. (1936), Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 86, 19.—(1938) Ibid., 39, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vurpas, C., and Corman, L. (1933), Ann. Med. Psychol., 14, 409.Google Scholar
Wooley, L. F. (1930), Am. J. Psychiat., 9, 1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilboorg, G. (1931), ibid., 88, 493.—(1941) Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 46, 738.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.